Literature DB >> 3128650

Cost effectiveness of HemoQuant versus Hemoccult for colorectal cancer screening.

A M Joseph1, T W Crowson, E C Rich.   

Abstract

Initial reports on HemoQuant, a new quantitative test for occult gastrointestinal bleeding, suggest it is more sensitive than Hemoccult. Increased detection of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding and dietary hemoglobin may reduce HemoQuant's specificity in the screening setting. The authors performed a cost effectiveness analysis comparing Hemoccult and HemoQuant for colorectal cancer screening using assumptions based on probabilities and costs in the current literature, varying the specificity of HemoQuant. The analysis showed the marginal cost effectiveness of Hemoccult versus no test to be $43,000, and HemoQuant versus Hemoccult to be $296,000 if HemoQuant specificity is 0.95. The marginal cost effectiveness ratio increased to $601,000 if three HemoQuant tests were used. Survival benefit was small and highly dependent on Hemoccult sensitivity and mortality from colonoscopy if HemoQuant specificity was less than 0.9. The authors conclude that unless the high sensitivity reported for HemoQuant is accompanied by a specificity comparable to that of Hemoccult, HemoQuant may not be an acceptable alternative for colorectal cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3128650     DOI: 10.1007/bf02596117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  41 in total

1.  Complications of flexible fiberoptic colonoscopy and polypectomy.

Authors:  B H Rogers; S E Silvis; O T Nebel; C Sugawa; P Mandelstam
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  What do we gain from the sixth stool guaiac?

Authors:  D Neuhauser; A M Lewicki
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Effect of workup strategy on the cost-effectiveness of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M J Barry; A G Mulley; J M Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Occult-blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: the yield and the costs.

Authors:  J W Frank
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  The economics of screening for colo-rectal cancer.

Authors:  M M Kristein
Journal:  Soc Sci Med Med Econ       Date:  1980-12

6.  Peroxidase levels in food: relevance to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  P Caligiore; F A Macrae; D J St John; L J Rayner; J W Legge
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Periodic health examination: a guide for designing individualized preventive health care in the asymptomatic patients. Medical Practice Committee, American College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  How to perform the fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  R Gnauck; F A Macrae; M Fleisher
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1984 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  The workup of the asymptomatic patient with a positive fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  M L Brandeau; D M Eddy
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1987 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Survival of 727 patients with single carcinomas of the large bowel.

Authors:  H C Umpleby; J B Bristol; J B Rainey; R C Williamson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The limited incorporation of economic analyses in clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Joel F Wallace; Scott R Weingarten; Chiun-Fang Chiou; James M Henning; Andriana A Hohlbauch; Margaret S Richards; Nicole S Herzog; Lior S Lewensztain; Joshua J Ofman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Cost-effective management of colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  J A Heine; D A Rothenberger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  A systematic comparison of microsimulation models of colorectal cancer: the role of assumptions about adenoma progression.

Authors:  Karen M Kuntz; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Carolyn M Rutter; Amy B Knudsen; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; James E Savarino; Eric J Feuer; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  How effective is cost effectiveness?

Authors:  R A McNutt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.