Literature DB >> 3939711

Occult-blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: the yield and the costs.

J W Frank1.   

Abstract

The potential benefits and risks associated with Hemoccult screening have been reviewed in two companion papers. This final article assesses two major determinants of the overall "disease yield" of occult-blood screening, as well as the economic costs entailed by the maneuver. First, asymptomatic polyps detected and treated by such screening are more properly considered "false" positives than "true" positives--the benefits of their aggressive diagnosis and extirpation in the general population being much less established than the risks. Secondly, the ongoing detection rate for colorectal carcinoma on subsequent (e.g., annual) screenings of a population already screened will be substantially less than the initial screening yield; yet, the risks of confirmatory diagnostic procedures remain high. Lastly, there are many hidden costs to occult-blood screening that have generally not been recognized. Therefore, the use of Hemoccult screening as a routine health maintenance maneuver cannot yet be justified for any age-group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3939711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  7 in total

1.  How serious are the adverse effects of screening?

Authors:  W Feldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Prevention and early detection in family medicine: where are we?

Authors:  J W Feightner
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Promoting preventive care: changing reimbursement is not enough.

Authors:  S J McPhee; S A Schroeder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Do health service organizations and community health centres have higher disease prevention and health promotion levels than fee-for-service practices?

Authors:  J Abelson; J Lomas
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Cost effectiveness of HemoQuant versus Hemoccult for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  A M Joseph; T W Crowson; E C Rich
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Colorectal carcinoma and Haemoccult. A study of its value in mass screening using meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Windeler; J Köbberling
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Sigmoidoscopy in general practice.

Authors:  S R Glaser
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.275

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.