Literature DB >> 1949858

Cost-effective management of colon and rectal cancer.

J A Heine1, D A Rothenberger.   

Abstract

Health care costs in the United States of America continue to rise. Legislators, economists and third party payers are becoming increasingly concerned with intervention outcomes and the distribution of resources. It is the responsibility of the medical profession to assume a leading role in assessing the cost-effectiveness of health care interventions. Although many physicians perform informal cost-effectiveness analyses on a daily basis, health economists employ a variety of more complex methodologies. This article will attempt to provide physicians with an understanding of the value and limitations of the tools used in formal cost-effectiveness analyses and demonstrate how these tools may be applied to the management of colon and rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1949858     DOI: 10.1007/bf01789205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  94 in total

1.  What do we gain from the sixth stool guaiac?

Authors:  D Neuhauser; A M Lewicki
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  CEA directed second-look surgery for colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Minton; A H Chevinsky
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1989

3.  Health economics: an introduction for clinicians.

Authors:  M Drummond; G Stoddart; R Labelle; R Cushman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Effect of workup strategy on the cost-effectiveness of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M J Barry; A G Mulley; J M Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Cost-effectiveness of fecal occult blood screening.

Authors:  T G Ganiats; W A Norcross
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-04

6.  Ethics, cost containment, and the allocation of scarce resources.

Authors:  R Priester; A L Caplan
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  The economics of cancer prevention and detection: getting more for less.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Postoperative radiotherapy in Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. A randomized multicenter study.

Authors:  I Balslev; M Pedersen; P S Teglbjaerg; F Hanberg-Soerensen; J Bone; N O Jacobsen; J Overgaard; A Sell; K Bertelsen; E Hage
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Pursuing efficiency in surgical practice.

Authors:  J H Wyllie; I G Kidson; D H Wyllie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-11-26

10.  Survival of 727 patients with single carcinomas of the large bowel.

Authors:  H C Umpleby; J B Bristol; J B Rainey; R C Williamson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Screening, prevention and socioeconomic costs associated with the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Redaelli; Carole W Cranor; Gary J Okano; Pat Ray Reese
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Screening and the costs of treating colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D K Whynes; A R Walker; J O Chamberlain; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.