Literature DB >> 19231568

Effect of two connector designs on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic core materials for fixed dental prostheses.

Kwansiri Plengsombut1, Jane D Brewer, Edward A Monaco, Elaine L Davis.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Most all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fail at the connectors.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of 2 connector designs on the fracture resistance of core materials used for all-ceramic FDPs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three materials were tested: (1) heat-pressed lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS e.max Press (Press)), (2) milled lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS e.max CAD (CAD)), and (3) milled yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP) (IPS e.max ZirCAD (ZirCAD)). Specimens were made into 30 x 4 x 4-mm bars to represent 3-unit FDPs. Two connector designs, round (0.60 +/-0.01-mm radius of curvature) and sharp (0.06 +/-0.001-mm radius of curvature), with a 3.00 +/-0.05-mm cross-section for each connector, were studied (n=5). Each specimen was loaded to fracture in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.1 mm/min. Data were analyzed with a 2-way univariate ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (alpha=.05).
RESULTS: Mean (SD) failure loads for round connector designs were 684.2 (70.1) N for ZirCAD, 260 (7.8) N for CAD, and 172.9 (35.5) N for Press. Mean (SD) failure loads for sharp connector designs were 386.3 (51.5) N for ZirCAD, 87.9 (7.0) N for CAD, and 125.1 (15.1) N for Press. The 2-way univariate ANOVA indicated statistically significant differences (P<.005) for material and connector design, and, also, a significant interaction between material and connector design. Higher maximum failure loads were found for the round connector design when compared to the sharp connector design, for ZirCAD and CAD. However, this difference was not statistically significant for the Press groups. SEM subjective assessment of the fractured specimens revealed that the fracture initiated from the gingival surface (tensile) of the connector toward the pontic (central loading point).
CONCLUSIONS: Fracture resistance of ceramic core materials is affected by fabrication technique and connector design. Connector design affected fracture resistance of the milled ceramic, but not the pressed ceramic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19231568     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60022-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  15 in total

1.  Fracture load of three-unit full-contour fixed dental prostheses fabricated with subtractive and additive CAD/CAM technology.

Authors:  Moritz Zimmermann; Andreas Ender; Thomas Attin; Albert Mehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Prosthodontic rehabilitation of a patient with aggressive periodontitis.

Authors:  David Livingstone; Varsha Murthy; Vineela Katam Reddy; Ajay Pillai
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-03-05

3.  Fractographic analysis of a dental zirconia framework: a case study on design issues.

Authors:  Ulrich Lohbauer; Gudrun Amberger; George D Quinn; Susanne S Scherrer
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2010-07-16

4.  Effect of ceramic infrastructure on the failure behavior and stress distribution of fixed partial dentures.

Authors:  Márcia Borba; Yuanyuan Duan; Jason A Griggs; Paulo F Cesar; Álvaro Della Bona
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Fracture Resistance and Fracture Behaviour of Monolithic Multi-Layered Translucent Zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses with Different Placing Strategies of Connector: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Nada Heidari; Rasha Amawi; Przemek Seweryniak; Fahad Bakitian; Per Vult von Steyern
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2022-03-22

6.  Impact of thermocycling on surface roughness, microhardness and optical properties of three different lithium disilicate ceramics.

Authors:  Ahmad M Al-Thobity; Abdulkareem M AlOtaibi; Abdulrahman E Alhumaidan; Ahmed A Aldossary; Intisar Ahmad Siddiqui; Mohamed Ahmed Helal; Abdulmohsen Alsalman
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2022-08-11

7.  Maxillary rehabilitation of periodontally compromised patients with extensive one-piece fixed prostheses supported by natural teeth: a retrospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Alexander Heschl; Michael Haas; Josef Haas; Michael Payer; Walther Wegscheider; Raoul Polansky
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Loop connectors in dentogenic diastema.

Authors:  Sanjna Nayar; Raghevendra Jayesh; V Dinakarsamy
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2015-04

9.  Aesthetic rehabilitation with multiple loop connectors.

Authors:  Ashish Kalra; Mahesh E Gowda; Kamal Verma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-01

10.  The zirconia ceramic: strengths and weaknesses.

Authors:  Elie E Daou
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2014-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.