Literature DB >> 22633593

A prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses: three-year clinical results.

Jesus Peláez1, Pablo G Cogolludo, Benjamin Serrano, Jose F L Lozano, Maria J Suárez.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Although the favorable mechanical properties of zirconium oxide-based ceramics have increased the acceptance of fixed dental prostheses for use in the posterior regions of the mouth in recent years, there are few clinical studies documenting the longevity of these restorations. Furthermore, certain complications must be resolved before the material is used more extensively.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized prospective study was to evaluate the clinical performance of zirconia (Lava) 3-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty 3-unit fixed dental prostheses were placed in 17 participants to replace a second premolar or a first molar. Eleven were placed in the maxilla and 9 in the mandible. All abutment teeth were prepared with a chamfer finish line of 0.8 to 1 mm, and frameworks were prepared with the Lava system. Restorations were cemented with a resin cement. Two calibrated examiners independently evaluated the fixed dental prostheses 1 week (baseline) and 1, 2, and 3 years after placement with the California Dental Association quality evaluation system. The periodontal parameters: the gingival index, plaque index, margin index, and the probing depths of abutment teeth and contralateral teeth were assessed. Data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (α=.05).
RESULTS: All fixed dental prostheses were rated satisfactory after 3 years, and no fracture of the framework was observed during the observation period. One fixed dental prostheses was lost because of a biological complication at the 3-year examination, and a small degree of chipping of the veneering ceramic was observed in 2 participants. No significant differences among the periodontal parameters of the test and control teeth were observed except for the margin index.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of a 3-year evaluation suggest that posterior zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses are a reliable treatment.
Copyright © 2012 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22633593     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60094-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  14 in total

1.  Fracture load of three-unit full-contour fixed dental prostheses fabricated with subtractive and additive CAD/CAM technology.

Authors:  Moritz Zimmermann; Andreas Ender; Thomas Attin; Albert Mehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Survival-rate analysis of surface treated dental zirconia (Y-TZP) ceramics.

Authors:  Cedomir Oblak; Ivan Verdenik; Michael V Swain; Tomaz Kosmac
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  New Knowledge about Zirconium-Ceramic as a Structural Material in Fixed Prosthodontics.

Authors:  Davor Špehar; Marko Jakovac
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  Evaluation of success rate of Zirconia based restorations: A systematic review.

Authors:  Aditee Apte; Seema Sathe; Rewa Kawade
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-09-01

Review 5.  Do tooth-supported zirconia restorations present more technical failures related to fracture or loss of retention? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carla Castiglia Gonzaga; Paula Pontes Garcia; Letícia Maíra Wambier; Fernanda Harumi Oku Prochnow; Luciano Madeira; Paulo Francisco Cesar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Seven-year prospective clinical study on zirconia-based single crowns and fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Gianluca M Tartaglia; Ernesto Sidoti; Chiarella Sforza
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  An Interdisciplinary Approach for Hypoplastic Amelogenesis Imperfecta: A Case Report.

Authors:  Gulfem Ergun; Ayse Seda Ataol
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-06-20

Review 8.  Zirconia in fixed prosthesis. A literature review.

Authors:  Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Juan L Román-Rodríguez; Alberto Ferreiroa; María F Solá-Ruíz; Antonio Fons-Font
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2014-02-01

Review 9.  A systematic review of outcome measurements and quality of studies evaluating fixed tooth-supported restorations.

Authors:  Devangkumar Rajnikant Patel; Tim O'Brien; Aviva Petrie; Haralampos Petridis
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Clinical evaluation of performance of single unit polyetheretherketone crown restoration-a pilot study.

Authors:  Kavishma Sulaya; Satyabodh S Guttal
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.