Literature DB >> 31275823

Introduction of Directly Observed Procedural Skills (DOPS) as a Part of Competency-Based Medical Education in Otorhinolaryngology.

Mohan Bansal1.   

Abstract

The Directly Observed Procedural/Practical Skill (DOPS) is a relatively new but reliable tool for formative assessment. The lack of desired awareness regarding DOPS among the Otorhinolayngologists of India made us to conduct this study. The aim of the study was introduction of DOPS in Oto-rhino-laryngology Department. The objectives of the study were: (1) To prepare lists of Oto-rhino-laryngology procedures for DOPS, (2) To conduct Orientation program of DOPS for the participants, (3) To prepare a structured list of items for the rating scale, (4) To facilitate and conduct DOPS encounters of different Oto-rhino-laryngology procedures. The study was conducted in a tertiary care medical college hospital from April 2018 to August 2018. Thirty-three trainees and 5 trainers participated. The 421 DOPS encounters involved 41 Oto-rhino-laryngology procedures. For checking the association between average time and clinical settings and Oto-rhino-laryngology procedures and DOPS encounters, the nonparametric test χ2 test was employed. Male trainees (63.63%) outnumbered female trainees. Mostly trainees (91%) were aged 22-25 years. Approximately half (49%) of the Oto-rhino-laryngology procedures (20/41) and 9/10th (86.22%) of DOPS encounters (363/421) were conducted in OPD. The average time taken to complete the E.N.T. procedures and DOPS encounters was 15 min or less in the majority (91% and 98%) of the Oto-rhino-laryngology procedures (38/41) and DOPS encounters (414/421). DOPS was introduced as a learning tool in the Oto-rhino-laryngology Department of our medical college. For assessing the "competency level" of trainees for E.N.T. procedures, DOPS is a high quality instrument as it tests the candidate at the "does" level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Directly Observed Procedural Skills; Otorhinolaryngology; Workplace-based assessment

Year:  2019        PMID: 31275823      PMCID: PMC6582178          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-019-01624-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  15 in total

1.  Selecting performance assessment methods for experienced physicians.

Authors:  R B Hays; H A Davies; J D Beard; L J M Caldon; E A Farmer; P M Finucane; P McCrorie; D I Newble; L W T Schuwirth; G R Sibbald
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Assessing the performance of doctors in training.

Authors:  James Wilkinson; Andrea Benjamin; Winnie Wade
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-20

3.  Evaluating the utility of workplace-based assessment tools for speciality training.

Authors:  Z Setna; V Jha; K A M Boursicot; T E Roberts
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 5.237

4.  Practical experience of using directly observed procedures, mini clinical evaluation examinations, and peer observation in pre-registration house officer (FY1) trainees.

Authors:  A Morris; J Hewitt; C M Roberts
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31.

Authors:  John Norcini; Vanessa Burch
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Initial evaluation of the first year of the Foundation Assessment Programme.

Authors:  Helena Davies; Julian Archer; Lesley Southgate; John Norcini
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Feedback from educational supervisors and trainees on the implementation of curricula and the assessment system for core medical training.

Authors:  Gavin Johnson; James Barrett; Mike Jones; David Parry; Winnie Wade
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.659

8.  Performance in assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa conference.

Authors:  Katharine Boursicot; Luci Etheridge; Zeryab Setna; Alison Sturrock; Jean Ker; Sydney Smee; Elango Sambandam
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

9.  Evaluating evaluation: assessment of the American Board of Internal Medicine Resident Evaluation Form.

Authors:  W G Thompson; M Lipkin; D A Gilbert; R A Guzzo; L Roberson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Does direct observation of procedural skills reflect trainee's progress in otolaryngology?

Authors:  Z Awad; L Hayden; K Muthuswamy; P Ziprin; A Darzi; N S Tolley
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.597

View more
  2 in total

1.  Introduction of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) as a formative assessment tool during postgraduate training in anaesthesiology: Exploration of perceptions.

Authors:  Jui Y Lagoo; Shilpa B Joshi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-03-13

2.  The Effect of Repeated Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (R-DOPS) Assessment Method on the Clinical Skills of Anesthesiology Residents.

Authors:  Shideh Dabir; Mohammad Hoseinzadeh; Faramarz Mosaffa; Behnam Hosseini; Mastaneh Dahi; Maryam Vosoughian; Mohammadreza Moshari; Soodeh Tabashi; Ali Dabbagh
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-01-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.