Jonathan Purtle1, Félice Lê-Scherban1, Xi Wang1, Emily Brown1, Mariana Chilton1. 1. Department of Health Management and Policy (Purtle, Brown, Chilton), Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Lê-Scherban), and Center for Hunger Free Communities (Brown, Chilton), all at Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia; PolicyLab, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia (Wang).
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) increase risk of adult behavioral health conditions. State legislators are an important audience to target with evidence about ACEs because they make policy decisions that can prevent ACE exposure and enhance resilience. This study sought to describe state legislators' opinions about ACEs as risk factors for adult behavioral health conditions and identify how opinions vary between legislators with different characteristics. METHODS: A multimodal survey was conducted in 2017 (response rate, 16.4%; N=475). Dependent variables were the extent to which legislators thought that four ACEs-sexual abuse, physical abuse, witnessing domestic violence, and childhood neglect-increase risk of adult behavioral health conditions. Independent variables were legislator characteristics (e.g., ideology and gender). Rao-Scott chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression were conducted. RESULTS: Childhood sexual abuse was identified as a major risk factor by the largest proportion of respondents (77%), followed by childhood physical abuse (59%), witnessing domestic violence (39%), and childhood neglect (38%). The proportion identifying each ACE as a major risk factor was significantly higher among Democrats than among Republicans, liberals than among conservatives, and women than among men. For example, 56% of liberals identified witnessing domestic violence as a major risk factor, compared with 29% of conservatives (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Opinions about ACEs as risk factors for adult behavioral health conditions varied between legislators with different characteristics, especially liberals and conservatives. To enhance the policy impact of evidence about ACEs, advocates might consider developing multiple versions of ACE evidence summaries that are tailored on the basis of these characteristics.
OBJECTIVES: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) increase risk of adult behavioral health conditions. State legislators are an important audience to target with evidence about ACEs because they make policy decisions that can prevent ACE exposure and enhance resilience. This study sought to describe state legislators' opinions about ACEs as risk factors for adult behavioral health conditions and identify how opinions vary between legislators with different characteristics. METHODS: A multimodal survey was conducted in 2017 (response rate, 16.4%; N=475). Dependent variables were the extent to which legislators thought that four ACEs-sexual abuse, physical abuse, witnessing domestic violence, and childhood neglect-increase risk of adult behavioral health conditions. Independent variables were legislator characteristics (e.g., ideology and gender). Rao-Scott chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression were conducted. RESULTS:Childhood sexual abuse was identified as a major risk factor by the largest proportion of respondents (77%), followed by childhood physical abuse (59%), witnessing domestic violence (39%), and childhood neglect (38%). The proportion identifying each ACE as a major risk factor was significantly higher among Democrats than among Republicans, liberals than among conservatives, and women than among men. For example, 56% of liberals identified witnessing domestic violence as a major risk factor, compared with 29% of conservatives (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Opinions about ACEs as risk factors for adult behavioral health conditions varied between legislators with different characteristics, especially liberals and conservatives. To enhance the policy impact of evidence about ACEs, advocates might consider developing multiple versions of ACE evidence summaries that are tailored on the basis of these characteristics.
Authors: Joanne Klevens; Brian Schmidt; Feijun Luo; Likang Xu; Katie A Ports; Rosalyn D Lee Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke; Mark Kennedy; Robert Kumsta; Nicky Knights; Dennis Golm; Michael Rutter; Barbara Maughan; Wolff Schlotz; Jana Kreppner Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jennifer Leeman; Sarah A Birken; Byron J Powell; Catherine Rohweder; Christopher M Shea Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-11-03 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Meagan Pilar; Jonathan Purtle; Byron J Powell; Stephanie Mazzucca; Amy A Eyler; Ross C Brownson Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2022-06-11
Authors: Jonathan Purtle; Katherine L Nelson; Sarah Mc Cue Horwitz; Mary M McKay; Kimberly E Hoagwood Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 7.327