Literature DB >> 31269870

Estimating the subgroup and testing for treatment effect in a post-hoc analysis of a clinical trial with a biomarker.

Neha Joshi1, Jason Fine1, Rong Chu2, Anastasia Ivanova1.   

Abstract

We consider the problem of estimating a biomarker-based subgroup and testing for treatment effect in the overall population and in the subgroup after the trial. We define the best subgroup as the subgroup that maximizes the power for comparing the experimental treatment with the control. In the case of continuous outcome and a single biomarker, both a non-parametric method of estimating the subgroup and a method based on fitting a linear model with treatment by biomarker interaction to the data perform well. Several procedures for testing for treatment effect in all and in the subgroup are discussed. Cross-validation with two cohorts is used to estimate the biomarker cut-off to determine the best subgroup and to test for treatment effect. An approach that combines the tests in all patients and in the subgroup using Hochberg's method is recommended. This test performs well in the case when there is a subgroup with sizable treatment effect and in the case when the treatment is beneficial to everyone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Subgroup; biomarker; cross-validation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31269870      PMCID: PMC6677135          DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1633655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  12 in total

1.  An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints.

Authors:  Martin Jenkins; Andrew Stone; Christopher Jennison
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 1.894

2.  Adaptive signature design: an adaptive clinical trial design for generating and prospectively testing a gene expression signature for sensitive patients.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  A method for testing a prespecified subgroup in clinical trials.

Authors:  Yang Song; George Y H Chi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Biomarker-adaptive threshold design: a procedure for evaluating treatment with possible biomarker-defined subset effect.

Authors:  Wenyu Jiang; Boris Freidlin; Richard Simon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  A flexible strategy for testing subgroups and overall population.

Authors:  Mohamed Alosh; Mohammad F Huque
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Jeremy M G Taylor; Stephen J Ruberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Subgroup identification based on differential effect search--a recursive partitioning method for establishing response to treatment in patient subpopulations.

Authors:  Ilya Lipkovich; Alex Dmitrienko; Jonathan Denne; Gregory Enas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials.

Authors:  Noah Simon; Richard Simon
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.899

9.  Global, multicenter, randomized, phase II trial of gemcitabine and gemcitabine plus AGS-1C4D4 in patients with previously untreated, metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  B M Wolpin; E M O'Reilly; Y J Ko; L S Blaszkowsky; M Rarick; C M Rocha-Lima; P Ritch; E Chan; J Spratlin; T Macarulla; E McWhirter; D Pezet; M Lichinitser; L Roman; A Hartford; K Morrison; L Jackson; M Vincent; L Reyno; M Hidalgo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  The cross-validated adaptive signature design.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Wenyu Jiang; Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  2 in total

1.  The precision interventions for severe and/or exacerbation-prone asthma (PrecISE) adaptive platform trial: statistical considerations.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Elliot Israel; Lisa M LaVange; Michael C Peters; Loren C Denlinger; Wendy C Moore; Leonard B Bacharier; M Alison Marquis; Nathan M Gotman; Michael R Kosorok; Chalmer Tomlinson; David T Mauger; Steve N Georas; Rosalind J Wright; Patricia Noel; Gary L Rosner; Praveen Akuthota; Dean Billheimer; Eugene R Bleecker; Juan Carlos Cardet; Mario Castro; Emily A DiMango; Serpil C Erzurum; John V Fahy; Merritt L Fajt; Benjamin M Gaston; Fernando Holguin; Sonia Jain; Nicholas J Kenyon; Jerry A Krishnan; Monica Kraft; Rajesh Kumar; Mark C Liu; Ngoc P Ly; James N Moy; Wanda Phipatanakul; Kristie Ross; Lewis J Smith; Stanley J Szefler; W Gerald Teague; Michael E Wechsler; Sally E Wenzel; Steven R White
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Multi-stage adaptive enrichment trial design with subgroup estimation.

Authors:  Neha Joshi; Crystal Nguyen; Anastasia Ivanova
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 1.051

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.