Literature DB >> 17266164

A method for testing a prespecified subgroup in clinical trials.

Yang Song1, George Y H Chi.   

Abstract

In clinical trials, investigators are often interested in the effect of a given study treatment on a subgroup of patients with certain clinical or biological attributes in addition to its effect on the overall study population. Such a subgroup analysis would become even more important to the study sponsor if an efficacy claim can be made for the subgroup when the test for the overall study population fails at a prespecified alpha level. In practice, such a claim is often dependent on prespecification of the subgroup and certain implicit or explicit requirements placed on the study results due to ethical or regulatory concerns. By carefully considering these requirements, we propose a general statistical methodology for testing both the overall and subgroup hypotheses, which has optimal power and strongly controls the familywise Type I error rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17266164     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  21 in total

1.  Interaction trees with censored survival data.

Authors:  Xiaogang Su; Tianni Zhou; Xin Yan; Juanjuan Fan; Song Yang
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Optimal Tests of Treatment Effects for the Overall Population and Two Subpopulations in Randomized Trials, using Sparse Linear Programming.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Han Liu; En-Hsu Yen
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Design of clinical trials for biomarker research in oncology.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2011-12

4.  Clinical trial designs for evaluating the medical utility of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in oncology.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  A threshold sample-enrichment approach in a clinical trial with heterogeneous subpopulations.

Authors:  Aiyi Liu; Chunling Liu; Qizhai Li; Kai F Yu; Vivian W Yuan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Uniformly Most Powerful Tests for Simultaneously Detecting a Treatment Effect in the Overall Population and at Least One Subpopulation.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 1.111

Review 7.  Biomarker-Guided Non-Adaptive Trial Designs in Phase II and Phase III: A Methodological Review.

Authors:  Miranta Antoniou; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona; Andrea L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2017-01-25

8.  Subgroup detection and sample size calculation with proportional hazards regression for survival data.

Authors:  Suhyun Kang; Wenbin Lu; Rui Song
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Randomized Phase III Trial of Ibrutinib and Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone in Non-Germinal Center B-Cell Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Anas Younes; Laurie H Sehn; Peter Johnson; Pier Luigi Zinzani; Xiaonan Hong; Jun Zhu; Caterina Patti; David Belada; Olga Samoilova; Cheolwon Suh; Sirpa Leppä; Shinya Rai; Mehmet Turgut; Wojciech Jurczak; Matthew C Cheung; Ronit Gurion; Su-Peng Yeh; Andres Lopez-Hernandez; Ulrich Dührsen; Catherine Thieblemont; Carlos Sergio Chiattone; Sriram Balasubramanian; Jodi Carey; Grace Liu; S Martin Shreeve; Steven Sun; Sen Hong Zhuang; Jessica Vermeulen; Louis M Staudt; Wyndham Wilson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Lost in translation: problems and pitfalls in translating laboratory observations to clinical utility.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 9.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.