Literature DB >> 31267345

Methane emissions from abandoned coal and oil and gas developments in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.

James P Williams1, David Risk2, Alexander Marshall3, Nick Nickerson3, Alexandra Martell3, Chance Creelman3, Mitchell Grace4, Grant Wach5.   

Abstract

Energy reserves have been exploited in the Atlantic Canadian provinces since the early 1600s, and many fossil fuel extraction sites have been abandoned over this long history of energy development. Oil, natural gas, and coal extraction sites are a source of greenhouse gas emissions, particularly for methane (CH4). In this study, we used multiple sampling methods to measure CH4 from abandoned coal mine openings in Nova Scotia and a legacy oilfield in New Brunswick. Atmospheric and shallow soil gases were sampled around legacy sites using flux rate chamber measurements (spatial and temporal) and plot-scale atmospheric gas surveys, in addition to regional gas screening surveys over larger populations of sites to confirm whether small-scale observations were reflected regionally. Only one oil and gas site (2.4 ± 3.1⋅ 102 mg m- 2 day- 1) and one abandoned coal mine opening (1.0 ± 1.1⋅ 102 mg m- 2 day- 1) were affected by soil CH4 migration, though rates of leakage were minimal and would rank as low severity on industrial scales. Plot-scale atmospheric gas screening showed super-ambient CH4 concentrations at 5 sites in total (n = 16), 2 coal adits and 3 abandoned oil and gas wells. Regional gas screening surveys suggest that 11% of legacy oil and gas sites have some emission impacts, compared with 1-2% of legacy coal sites. These frequencies are close, albeit lower than the 15% of legacy oil and gas sites and 10% of abandoned coal mine openings flagged from our aggregated small-scale observations. These sites may emit less than other developments studied to date either because more time has elapsed since extraction, or because differences in regional geology reduce the likelihood of sustained emissions. This study provides valuable information to help understand the methane emission risks associated with legacy energy sites.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abandoned fossil fuel sites; Atmospheric gas sampling; Geochemical analysis; Methane emissions; Soil gas flux

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31267345     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7602-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  11 in total

1.  An improved inventory of methane emissions from coal mining in the United States.

Authors:  D A Kirchgessner; S D Piccot; S S Masemore
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States.

Authors:  David T Allen; Vincent M Torres; James Thomas; David W Sullivan; Matthew Harrison; Al Hendler; Scott C Herndon; Charles E Kolb; Matthew P Fraser; A Daniel Hill; Brian K Lamb; Jennifer Miskimins; Robert F Sawyer; John H Seinfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Atmospheric impacts of a natural gas development within the urban context of Morgantown, West Virginia.

Authors:  Philip J Williams; Matthew Reeder; Natalie J Pekney; David Risk; John Osborne; Michael McCawley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers.

Authors:  Edward J Dlugokencky; Euan G Nisbet; Rebecca Fisher; David Lowry
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.

Authors:  Yude Pan; Richard A Birdsey; Jingyun Fang; Richard Houghton; Pekka E Kauppi; Werner A Kurz; Oliver L Phillips; Anatoly Shvidenko; Simon L Lewis; Josep G Canadell; Philippe Ciais; Robert B Jackson; Stephen W Pacala; A David McGuire; Shilong Piao; Aapo Rautiainen; Stephen Sitch; Daniel Hayes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Natural gas: Should fracking stop?

Authors:  Robert W Howarth; Anthony Ingraffea; Terry Engelder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Direct measurements of methane emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Mary Kang; Cynthia M Kanno; Matthew C Reid; Xin Zhang; Denise L Mauzerall; Michael A Celia; Yuheng Chen; Tullis C Onstott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Increased stray gas abundance in a subset of drinking water wells near Marcellus shale gas extraction.

Authors:  Robert B Jackson; Avner Vengosh; Thomas H Darrah; Nathaniel R Warner; Adrian Down; Robert J Poreda; Stephen G Osborn; Kaiguang Zhao; Jonathan D Karr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Fugitive emissions of methane from abandoned, decommissioned oil and gas wells.

Authors:  I M Boothroyd; S Almond; S M Qassim; F Worrall; R J Davies
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Measurement of greenhouse gas flux from agricultural soils using static chambers.

Authors:  Sarah M Collier; Matthew D Ruark; Lawrence G Oates; William E Jokela; Curtis J Dell
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.