Literature DB >> 26822472

Fugitive emissions of methane from abandoned, decommissioned oil and gas wells.

I M Boothroyd1, S Almond1, S M Qassim1, F Worrall2, R J Davies3.   

Abstract

This study considered the fugitive emissions of methane (CH4) from former oil and gas exploration and production wells drilled to exploit conventional hydrocarbon reservoirs onshore in the UK. This study selected from the 66% of all onshore wells in the UK which appeared to be properly decommissioned (abandoned) that came from 4 different basins and were between 8 and 79 years old. The soil gas above each well was analysed and assessed relative to a nearby control site of similar land use and soil type. The results showed that of the 102 wells considered 30% had soil gas CH4 at the soil surface that was significantly greater than their respective control. Conversely, 39% of well sites had significant lower surface soil gas CH4 concentrations than their respective control. We interpret elevated soil gas CH4 concentrations to be the result of well integrity failure, but do not know the source of the gas nor the route to the surface. Where elevated CH4 was detected it appears to have occurred within a decade of it being drilled. The flux of CH4 from wells was 364 ± 677 kg CO2eq/well/year with a 27% chance that the well would have a negative flux to the atmosphere independent of well age. This flux is low relative to the activity commonly used on decommissioned well sites (e.g. sheep grazing), however, fluxes from wells that have not been appropriately decommissioned would be expected to be higher.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Greenhouse gases; Shale gas; Well integrity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26822472     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

1.  Identification and characterization of high methane-emitting abandoned oil and gas wells.

Authors:  Mary Kang; Shanna Christian; Michael A Celia; Denise L Mauzerall; Markus Bill; Alana R Miller; Yuheng Chen; Mark E Conrad; Thomas H Darrah; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Pollution, management, and mitigation of idle and orphaned oil and gas wells in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Vanessa Alboiu; Tony R Walker
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Methane emissions from abandoned coal and oil and gas developments in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.

Authors:  James P Williams; David Risk; Alexander Marshall; Nick Nickerson; Alexandra Martell; Chance Creelman; Mitchell Grace; Grant Wach
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Residential Proximity to Oil and Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in California: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 2006-2015 Births.

Authors:  Kathy V Tran; Joan A Casey; Lara J Cushing; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Barometric-pumping controls fugitive gas emissions from a vadose zone natural gas release.

Authors:  Olenka N Forde; Aaron G Cahill; Roger D Beckie; K Ulrich Mayer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A mobile application to protect groundwater during unconventional oil and gas extraction.

Authors:  Charissa Worthmann; Surina Esterhuyse
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.653

Review 7.  Toward Consistent Methodology to Quantify Populations in Proximity to Oil and Gas Development: A National Spatial Analysis and Review.

Authors:  Eliza D Czolowski; Renee L Santoro; Tanja Srebotnjak; Seth B C Shonkoff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.