| Literature DB >> 31263238 |
Jonathan Arias-Fuenzalida1,2,3, Javier Jarazo1,2, Jonas Walter1,2, Gemma Gomez-Giro1,2,4, Julia I Forster1,5, Rejko Krueger1,5, Paul M A Antony6,7, Jens C Schwamborn8,9.
Abstract
Autophagic processes play a central role in cellular homeostasis. In pathological conditions, the flow of autophagy can be affected at multiple and distinct steps of the pathway. Current analyses tools do not deliver the required detail for dissecting pathway intermediates. The development of new tools to analyze autophagic processes qualitatively and quantitatively in a more straightforward manner is required. Defining all autophagy pathway intermediates in a high-throughput manner is technologically challenging and has not been addressed yet. Here, we overcome those requirements and limitations by the developed of stable autophagy and mitophagy reporter-iPSC and the establishment of a novel high-throughput phenotyping platform utilizing automated high-content image analysis to assess autophagy and mitophagy pathway intermediates.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31263238 PMCID: PMC6603000 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45917-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Genetically encoded Rosella-LC3 and ATP5C1-Rosella systems allow monitoring of the complete autophagy and mitophagy pathway. (A) Structure of the Rosella autophagy reporter system. It is possible to identify phagophores, autophagosomes, and autolysosomes. Small molecule modulators of autophagy can interrogate the autophagy responsiveness. (B) Structure of the Rosella mitophagy reporter system. It is possible to determine mitochondrial network structure and mitophagy events. Small molecule mitochondria stressors can test the mitophagy capacity. Contrast of displayed images in (A) and (B) was adjusted by saturating the bottom and the top 1% of all the pixels values. (C) Representative field for Rosella-LC3 line. The pHluorin and DsRed channels are shown separately. Scale bar, 10 µm. (D) Representative field for ATP5C1-Rosella line. The pHluorin and DsRed channels are shown separately. Scale bar, 10 µm. (E) 3D reconstruction based on the Rosella-LC3 line. The insets show DsRedpospHluorinpos autophagosome structures, DsRedpospHluorinneg autolysosome structures, and DsRedpospHluorinpos phagophores. Scale bar, 10 µm. (F) 3D reconstruction based on the ATP5C1-Rosella line. An autolysosome structure with an ongoing mitophagy event is shown. The autolysosome appears with an equatorial cross section and the light DsRed volume is represented in cyan. The residual mitochondria inside the autolysosome are pHluorinneg, maintaining the pH-resistant DsRed signal. A phagophore DsRedpospHluorinpos cluster is located in the upper left-hand corner. In the inset, a single plane overlay is shown. The event was observed upon addition of 5 µM valinomycin. Scale bar, 4 µm. (G) Absolute quantification of phagophores, autophagosomes, early autolysosomes and late autolysosomes per field. At seeding density of as 600k cells/cm2, a range of 40–60 cells per field was obtained. (H) Level of detection of the algorithm compared to manually segmented images (n = 10). Events were manually segmented by establishing a region of interest (ROI) around each event detected and compared to the events detected by the automated image analysis. No statistical difference (t-test) was observed between the manual and algorithm segmentation for the different classes.
Figure 2Image analysis workflow for autophagy Rosella-LC3 reporter line. (A) Overlay of raw DsRed and pHluorin channels. (B) Raw image for DsRed, dsRedImRaw. (C) Raw image for pHluorin, pHluorinImRaw channel. (D) Deconvolved image of DsRed channel, dsRedDeconvolved. (E) Deconvolved image of pHluorin channel, pHluorinDeconvolved. (F) Application of a difference of Gaussian filter, dsRedDoG, and its respective mask, dsRedDoGmask (G). (H) Top-hat filtering to improve the detection of red vesicles, dsRedTopHat, and its respective mask, dsRedTopHatMask (I). (J) Refinement of (I) by substitution with (G), dsRedTopHatMaskSplit. (K) Combination of (G,J), dsRedMask1. (L) To confirm the detection of red vesicles, a second difference of Gaussian was applied, dsRedDoG2, and its mask was created, dsRedDoG2Mask (M). (N) Using (K) as a seed, a watershed function was applied, dsRedStencil1. (O) Elementwise multiplication of (N) with (M), dsRedStencil2. (P) Pool of pixels in (K,O), dsRedMask. (Q) Application of a difference of Gaussian filter, GreenDoG, and its respective mask, GreenDoGMask (R). (S) Application of a Laplacian of Gaussian filter, GreenLoG, and its respective mask, GreenLoGmask (T). (U) Combination of (T,R), pHluorinMask. (V) Elementwise division between blurred (C) and blurred (B), RatioIm, and calculation of its complement, RatioImComp (W). (X) Top-hat filtering and its respective mask, AutoLysoMaskCandidates. (Y) Validation of (X) based on neighborhood pixel intensity, AutoLysoMask. (Z) Filtering of (Q) with a Butterworth high pass filter, GreenDoGFTB, and its respective mask, GreenDoG150 (AA). (AB) Opening of the (AA) mask, GreenDoG150b. (AC) Euler numbers used to detect holes. Elements with only one hole were kept, EulerZero. (AD) Pre-processing of (AC) by filling holes, EulerZeroFilled. (AE) Selection of (AD) based on the proportions between object and hole size, EulerSelect. (AF) EulerZeroHoles, and its respective mask, EulerMask (AG). (AH) Hough transforms for circle detection on (C), HoughInput. (AI) Validation of (AF) based on the pixel values of (B,C), HoughOutput. (AJ) Combination of (AG) and (AI), AutophagosomeCandidates. (AK) Mask based on the mean intensity in (B) of all connected components, VesiclesAll. (AL) The remaining connected components of (AK) were evaluated on eccentricity, NonCircularVesicleMask. (AM) All vesicles mapped on DsRed channel. (AN) All vesicles mapped in pHluorin channel. Contrast of displayed images was adjusted by saturating the bottom and the top 1% of all the pixels values. Diameters shown in the results section correspond to the major axis length of the respective vesicles. Scale bars indicate 20 µm and 3x zoomed insets are highlighted with yellow boxes. (AO) Formula for calculating the sphericity indices used in the analysis.
Figure 3Quantification of autophagy structures before and after addition of mitophagy or autophagy modulators. (A) Representative fields of live Rosella-LC3 and fixed LC3 antibody. Scale bar, 20 µm. Contrast of displayed images was adjusted by saturating the bottom and the top 1% of all the pixels values. (B) Heatmap of scaled (0.0–2.0) category-mean normalized absolute frequency per well for autophagic structures for live Rosella and fixed LC3 antibody Rosella-LC3. Each line in the heatmap represents the averaged amount of vesicles observed of a well. Significance matrix of Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparison test is shown below. (C) Autophagic-vacuoles are quantified as the sum of autophagosomes, early autolysosomes, and late autolysosomes. Dunnett’s multiple comparison of means was performed for all conditions with respect to the basal reference (ref). Standard deviations are shown. Each dot represents the sum of objects in one imaged field. Data represent three independent replicates. (D) Representative lysotracker staining. Lysosome mask on red perimeter. Contrast of the image was adjusted by saturating the bottom and the top 1% of all the pixels values. Scale bars indicate 20 µm. (E) Lysosome frequency and diameter in basal conditions. Figure significance levels are *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 4Evaluation of mitochondria network and mitophagic-vacuoles. (A) Representative images of ATP5C1-Rosella reporter. Mitochondria network mask on green perimeter and mitophagic-vacuole mask on red perimeter. Scale bars indicate 20 µm. (B) Image analysis workflow for mitophagy with ATP5C1-Rosella reporter line. Scale bars indicate 20 µm and 3x zoomed insets are highlighted with yellow boxes. Contrast of displayed images was adjusted by saturating the bottom and the top 1% of all the pixels values. (C) Mitochondrial and mitophagy volumes in basal conditions. (D) Mitophagy frequencies in basal condition and after mitochondrial stress induction. (E) Evaluation of mitophagy levels and distribution of autophagy resources upon mitochondrial stress. Percentages for mitophagy and non-mitochondrial autophagy are indicated.