Literature DB >> 21738127

Genetic engineering of human pluripotent cells using TALE nucleases.

Dirk Hockemeyer1, Haoyi Wang, Samira Kiani, Christine S Lai, Qing Gao, John P Cassady, Gregory J Cost, Lei Zhang, Yolanda Santiago, Jeffrey C Miller, Bryan Zeitler, Jennifer M Cherone, Xiangdong Meng, Sarah J Hinkley, Edward J Rebar, Philip D Gregory, Fyodor D Urnov, Rudolf Jaenisch.   

Abstract

Targeted genetic engineering of human pluripotent cells is a prerequisite for exploiting their full potential. Such genetic manipulations can be achieved using site-specific nucleases. Here we engineered transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) for five distinct genomic loci. At all loci tested we obtained human embryonic stem cell (ESC) and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) clones carrying transgenic cassettes solely at the TALEN-specified location. Our data suggest that TALENs employing the specific architectures described here mediate site-specific genome modification in human pluripotent cells with similar efficiency and precision as do zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21738127      PMCID: PMC3152587          DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


Gene targeting of human pluripotent cells by homologous recombination is inefficient, which has impeded the use of human ES and iPS cells (hESCs and hiPSCs) in disease models. To overcome this limitation, we and others have shown that zinc finger nucleases can be used to modify the genomes of hESCs and iPSCs[1-3]. ZFNs can be engineered to induce a double strand break (DSB) precisely at a predetermined position in the genome[4]. This DSB can be repaired by end-joining to drive targeted gene disruption, or via the homology-directed DNA repair pathway using an ectopically provided donor plasmid as a template. Depending on the donor design, this repair reaction can be used to generate large-scale deletions, gene disruptions, DNA addition[4] or single nucleotide changes[5]. Recent work on transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) suggests[6] suggests an alternative approach to the design of site-specific nucleases. Natural TALEs are transcription factors used by plant-pathogens to subvert host genome regulatory networks[6]. The DNA binding domain of TALEs is unusual: multiple ~34 amino acid units (”TALE repeats”) are arranged in tandem, their sequence nearly identical except for two highly variable amino acids that establish the base recognition specificity for each unit[7, 8]. Each individual domain determines the specificity of binding to one DNA base pair in the TALE recognition sequence and therefore four different repeat units are sufficient to specify a novel site[7, 8]. Nucleases based on such engineered TALE domains can target endogenous genes in transformed human cells[9, 10]. Here, we assess whether TALENs can be used to genetically engineer endogenous loci in hESCs and iPSCs. We designed TALENs targeting PPP1R12C (the AAVS1 locus), OCT4, PITX3 genes at precisely the same positions as targeted earlier by ZFNs2. TALEN expression constructs and corresponding homology bearing donor plasmids were electroporated into hESCs (line WIBR#3)[11] and iPSCs (line C1)[12] (see FigureS 1, TableS 1, 2). Southern blot analysis was used to identify correctly targeted clones. We targeted the PPP1R12C gene with a gene trap approach (expressing puromycin (Puro) from the endogenous gene; Figure 1A,B; Table 1) or with an autonomous selection cassette (Puro expressed from the PGK-promoter (Figure 1, Table 1; Figure S1, 2, 3). Targeting efficiency was high and comparable to that with ZFNs2 with 50% of the clones being targeted in one or both alleles carrying no randomly integrated transgenes (Figure 1B, Table 1; Figure S2). Similarly, a SA-Puro-eGFPeGFP transgene was highly expressed from this locus (Figure 1A; Figure S3A,B). Importantly, such targeted cells remained pluripotent based on analysis of marker expression and teratomas. Cells of all germ layers expressed eGFP indicating that TALEN as well as ZFN-mediated targeting of the PPP1R12C gene results in robust transgene expression in pluripotent as well as in differentiated cells (Figure S3C–E).
Figure 1

Genetic engineering of hESCs and iPSCs using TALENs

Schematic overview depicting the targeting strategy for the PPP1R12C gene. Southern blot probes are shown as red boxes, exons as blue boxes; the arrow indicates cut site by the TALENs. Donor plasmids: SA-2A-Puro - splice acceptor sequence followed by a 2A self-cleaving peptide sequence and the puromycin resistance gene; pA - polyadenylation sequence;PGK - phosphoglycerate kinase promoter; Puro - puromycin resistance gene; CAGGS - synthetic CAGGS promoter–containing the actin enhancer and the CMV early promoter; eGFP - enhanced green fluorescent protein. Below, scheme of PPP1R12C TALENs and their recognition sequence. TALE repeat domains are colored to indicate the identity of the repeat variable di-residue (RVD)[8]; each RVD is related to the cognate targeted DNA base by the following code (NI = A, HD = C, NN = G, NG = T)[7].

Southern blot analysis of WIBR#3 hESCs targeted using PPP1R12C TALENs and the SA-2A-Puro donor plasmid. Genomic DNA was digested with SphI and hybridized with an 32P-labeled external 3’-probe (Top) or with an internal 5’-probe (bottom). SA-2A-Puro 5’-probe detects a 6.5 kb wt and a 3.8 kb trageted fragment; 3’-probe a 6.5 kb wt and a 3.7kb targeted fragment. Wt = wild type and T = correctly targeted allele.

Schematic overview depicting the targeting strategy for the OCT4 locus using the OCT4-STOP TALENs. Southern blot probes and exon of OCT4 are colored as in panel A and the vertical arrow indicates the OCT4-STOP TALEN cut site. Shown above are the donor plasmid used to target the OCT4 locus, loxP-sites are shown as red triangles, UTR: untranslated region of the OCT4 gene.

Southern blot analysis of the WIBR#3 hESCs targeted in the OCT4 locus with the OCT4-eGFP-PGK-Puro donor plasmids. Genomic DNA was digested with BamHI and hybridized with the 32P-labeled external 3’-probe or with the internal eGFP probe. Two targeted clones are shown, one correctly targeted and one carrying a random integration. Expected fragment size: wt=4.2kb, targeted=6.8kb for both probes. Left lane: wt clone; middle lanes: clones before and after excision (right lane) of PGK-Puro cassette.

Southern blot analysis as in (D) of WIBR#3 hESCs targeted with 2A-eGFP-PGK-Puro donor plasmids. Expected fragment size as in (D). A clone before (left lane) and two clones after (right lanes) Cre-mediated excision of PGK-Puro cassette.

Southern blot analysis as in (D and E) of WIBR#3 hESCs targeted with the eGFP-2A-Puro donor plasmids. Expected fragment size: wt 4.2kb, targeted 5.6kb for both probes. Two correctly targeted clones (left two lanes) and one targeted clone carriying additional aberrant integration (right lane).

Left and middle panels show phase contrast images (top row) and corresponding eGFP fluorescence (bottom row) of OCT4-eGFP and OCT4-2A-eGFP hESCs after excision of the PGK-Puro cassette at two magnifications. Right panels: phase contrast images and eGFP fluorescence of OCT4-eGFP-2A-Puro targeted hESCs clones. Size bars 100µm.

Table 1

Summary of targeting experiments using TALENs OCT 4

correctly targeted clones
cell linetargetedTALENpairdonor# ofclonespickedrandomintegrationtargeted +additionalintegrationheterozygoushomozygoustargetingefficiency[%]
WIBR#3 hESCOCT4 intron1OCT4-SAeGFP# 1686062091
C1 iPSCOCT4 intron1OCT4-SAeGFP# 170070100
WIBR#3 hESCOCT4 intron1OCT4-SAeGFP# 3350034097
C1 iPSCOCT4 intron1OCT4-SAeGFP# 350050100
WIBR#3 hESCOCT4 intron1OCT4-eGFP exon1 fusion12408067
C1 iPSCOCT4 intron1OCT4-eGFP exon1 fusion10010100
WIBR#3 hESCOCT4 STOPOCT4-eGFP PGK-Puro (C-term fusion)484215010
C1 iPSCOCT4 STOPOCT4-eGFP PGK-Puro (C-term fusion)48453000
WIBR#3 hESCOCT4 STOPOCT4-2A-eGFP PGK-Puro (C-term fusion)48441306
C1 iPSCOCT4 STOPOCT4-2Ae-GFP PGK-Puro (C-term fusion)48461102
WIBR#3 hESCOCT4 STOPOCT4-eGFP-2A-Puro (genetrap)4802622046
PPP1R12C
WIBR#3 hESCPPP1R12CPPP1R12C-SA-2A-Puro96435342157
WIBR#3 hESCPPP1R12CPPP1R12C-PGK-Puro1071923521361
WIBR#3 hESCPPP1R12CPPP1R12C-CAGGS-eGFP3211612347
C1 iPSCPPP1R12CPPP1R12C-SA-2A-Puro24178866
C1 iPSCPPP1R12CPPP1R12C-PGK-Puro5542419849
C1 iPSCPPP1R12CPPP1R12C-CAGGS-eGFP231125543
WIBR#3 hESCPPP1R12C eHiFiPPP1R12C-SA-2A-Puro224514377
C1 iPSCPPP1R12C eHiFiPPP1R12C-SA-2A-Puro20079465
PITX3
WIBR#3 hESCPITX3 Exon 1PITX3 eGFP FW96622211113
C1 iPSCPITX3 Exon 1PITX3 eGFP FW96884404
C1 iPSCPITX3 Exon 1PITX3 eGFP BW968411101
WIBR#3 hESCPITX3 STOPPITX3-eGFP C-term fusion48201611123
C1 iPSCPITX3 STOPPITX3-eGFP C-term fusion483279019
WIBR#3 hESCPITX3 STOPPITX3-eGFP C-term 2A fusion96324419121
C1 iPSCPITX3 STOPPITX3-eGFP C-term 2A fusion4824139223
The OCT4 gene was targeted using three different donor plasmids resulting in expression of Puro and an OCT4 exon1-eGFP fusion protein under control of the endogenous OCT4 promoter. The first two donor plasmids were designed to integrate a splice acceptor-eGFP-2A-Puro cassette into the first intron of OCT4 whereas the third donor generated an in-frame fusion of exon 1 with the eGFP-2A-puromycin cassette (Figure S4). Targeting efficiency in ESCs and iPSCs was between 70% and 100% as determined by Southern blot analysis and DNA sequencing of single-cell-derived clones (Table 1, Figure S1,4). We also targeted the first exon of the non-expressed PITX3 gene and found that ~6% of drug resistant clones carried the transgene solely at the PITX3 locus as evaluated by Southern blot analysis (Table 1, Figure S1, 5). Notably, in one clone the transgene had integrated into both alleles of the non-expressed PITX3 gene. To target C’ terminus in the OCT4 gene, not previously targeted by ZFNs, we generated TALENs directed against sequences flanking the stop codon of the OCT4 gene using two donor plasmids: the last OCT4 codon was either fused in frame with a GFP-PGK-Puro construct or a with an eGFP preceded by a 2A sequence (2A-GFP-PGK-Puro; Figure 1C, Table 1). Following excision of the LoxP flanked PGK-Puro cassettes either a C-terminal OCT4-eGFP fusion protein or a separately translated eGFP proteins will be expressed under the control of the endogenous OCT4 gene[13]. Southern blot analysis showed that 2–10% of single cell derived hESC and hiPSC clones carried the transgene cassette at the OCT4 locus (Figure 1D, E; Table 1). Cre-mediated excision of the PGK-Puro cassette from OCT4-eGFP targeted hESCs resulted in nuclear eGFP fluorescence and from those targeted with OCT4-2A-eGFP -- in pan-cellular eGFP-fluorescence (Figure 1G). Fluorescence was higher in OCT4-2A-eGFP than in OCT4-eGFP targeted clones as determined by FACS analysis suggesting differential protein stabilities of the OCT4-eGFP fusion protein and eGFP (Figure S6). A gene trap vector fusing an eGFP-2A-Puro cassette with the last OCT4 codon had a 50% targeting efficiency (Figure 1C,F,G; Table 1; Figure S6) similar to that of gene trap-vectors designed to the first intron. As expected, eGFP expression became undetectable after differentiation into fibroblast-like cells (Figure S7) validating eGFP expression as a faithful reporter for OCT4 expression. To illustrate the general utility of TALENs to generate such C-terminal fusion proteins, we designed TALENs to cut at the last coding exon of PITX3 and generated hESCs and iPSCs with an in-frame fusion of 2A-eGFP or eGFP. Targeting was highly efficient resulting in some clones carrying the transgene on both alleles (Figure S8; Table 1). To assess the frequency of off-target modification not detected by Southern blot analysis we determined the binding specificity of the PPP1R12C TALENs using SELEX. When genotyping a panel of 19 maximal-likelihood potential off-target sites unintended cleavage was found only at low-frequency (See Figure S9, 10; Table S3, 4 and Supplemental material for detailed description). A strategy to minimize potential off-target events is to design TALENs to function as obligatory heterodimers[14]. As shown in Table 1, such heterodimeric nucleases in combination with the TALE DNA binding domain can yield high efficiency targeting of the PPP1R12C locus. Individual TALE repeats can be joined to produce DNA binding domains capable of recognizing endogenous sequences in mammalian cells[9, 10, 15]. In the present work, we have built on the recent development of an efficient TALEN architecture[9], and evaluated the utility of TALENs to drive targeted gene modifications in human ESCs and iPSCs. At all five genomic sites tested, we obtained clones carrying transgenes solely at the TALEN-specified locus at a frequency comparable to that observed with ZFNs2. As this approach couples a simple DNA recognition code with robust activity in human pluripotent stem cells, our data suggest that TALENs are a useful tool for investigator-specified targeting and genetic modification in human pluripotent cells with efficiencies similar to those we have previously reported for ZFNs.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases.

Authors:  Fyodor D Urnov; Edward J Rebar; Michael C Holmes; H Steve Zhang; Philip D Gregory
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Enhancing zinc-finger-nuclease activity with improved obligate heterodimeric architectures.

Authors:  Yannick Doyon; Thuy D Vo; Matthew C Mendel; Shon G Greenberg; Jianbin Wang; Danny F Xia; Jeffrey C Miller; Fyodor D Urnov; Philip D Gregory; Michael C Holmes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Generation of isogenic pluripotent stem cells differing exclusively at two early onset Parkinson point mutations.

Authors:  Frank Soldner; Josée Laganière; Albert W Cheng; Dirk Hockemeyer; Qing Gao; Raaji Alagappan; Vikram Khurana; Lawrence I Golbe; Richard H Myers; Susan Lindquist; Lei Zhang; Dmitry Guschin; Lauren K Fong; B Joseph Vu; Xiangdong Meng; Fyodor D Urnov; Edward J Rebar; Philip D Gregory; H Steve Zhang; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Xanthomonas AvrBs3 family-type III effectors: discovery and function.

Authors:  Jens Boch; Ulla Bonas
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 13.078

5.  Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations.

Authors:  Christopher J Lengner; Alexander A Gimelbrant; Jennifer A Erwin; Albert Wu Cheng; Matthew G Guenther; G Grant Welstead; Raaji Alagappan; Garrett M Frampton; Ping Xu; Julien Muffat; Sandro Santagata; Doug Powers; C Brent Barrett; Richard A Young; Jeannie T Lee; Rudolf Jaenisch; Maisam Mitalipova
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  A simple cipher governs DNA recognition by TAL effectors.

Authors:  Matthew J Moscou; Adam J Bogdanove
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors.

Authors:  Jens Boch; Heidi Scholze; Sebastian Schornack; Angelika Landgraf; Simone Hahn; Sabine Kay; Thomas Lahaye; Anja Nickstadt; Ulla Bonas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Efficient targeting of expressed and silent genes in human ESCs and iPSCs using zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Dirk Hockemeyer; Frank Soldner; Caroline Beard; Qing Gao; Maisam Mitalipova; Russell C DeKelver; George E Katibah; Ranier Amora; Elizabeth A Boydston; Bryan Zeitler; Xiangdong Meng; Jeffrey C Miller; Lei Zhang; Edward J Rebar; Philip D Gregory; Fyodor D Urnov; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Gene targeting of a disease-related gene in human induced pluripotent stem and embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Jizhong Zou; Morgan L Maeder; Prashant Mali; Shondra M Pruett-Miller; Stacey Thibodeau-Beganny; Bin-Kuan Chou; Guibin Chen; Zhaohui Ye; In-Hyun Park; George Q Daley; Matthew H Porteus; J Keith Joung; Linzhao Cheng
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  Efficient construction of sequence-specific TAL effectors for modulating mammalian transcription.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Le Cong; Simona Lodato; Sriram Kosuri; George M Church; Paola Arlotta
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  557 in total

1.  The iCRISPR platform for rapid genome editing in human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Zengrong Zhu; Federico González; Danwei Huangfu
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 2.  Determining the specificities of TALENs, Cas9, and other genome-editing enzymes.

Authors:  Vikram Pattanayak; John P Guilinger; David R Liu
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 3.  Gene therapy using stem cells.

Authors:  Erin R Burnight; Luke A Wiley; Robert F Mullins; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 4.  Induced pluripotent stem cells in dermatology: potentials, advances, and limitations.

Authors:  Ganna Bilousova; Dennis R Roop
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 5.  Find and replace: editing human genome in pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Huize Pan; Weiqi Zhang; Weizhou Zhang; Guang-Hui Liu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 14.870

6.  Evolution of iPSC disease models.

Authors:  Weiqi Zhang; Zhichao Ding; Guang-Hui Liu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 14.870

7.  Cut and paste: restoring cellular function by gene correction.

Authors:  Guang-Hui Liu; Ignacio Sancho-Martinez; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 8.  Stem cells and modeling of autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Beatriz C G Freitas; Cleber A Trujillo; Cassiano Carromeu; Marianna Yusupova; Roberto H Herai; Alysson R Muotri
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Efficient drug screening and gene correction for treating liver disease using patient-specific stem cells.

Authors:  Su Mi Choi; Yonghak Kim; Joong Sup Shim; Joon Tae Park; Rui-Hong Wang; Steven D Leach; Jun O Liu; Chuxia Deng; Zhaohui Ye; Yoon-Young Jang
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  TALEN-mediated gene mutagenesis in rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  Hailiang Liu; Yongchang Chen; Yuyu Niu; Kunshan Zhang; Yu Kang; Weihong Ge; Xiaojing Liu; Enfeng Zhao; Chencheng Wang; Shaoyun Lin; Bo Jing; Chenyang Si; Quan Lin; Xiaoying Chen; Haijun Lin; Xiuqiong Pu; Yingying Wang; Binlian Qin; Fang Wang; Hong Wang; Wei Si; Jing Zhou; Tao Tan; Tianqing Li; Shaohui Ji; Zhigang Xue; Yuping Luo; Liming Cheng; Qi Zhou; Siguang Li; Yi Eve Sun; Weizhi Ji
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 24.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.