Literature DB >> 31253467

Reduced cognitive deficits after FLASH irradiation of whole mouse brain are associated with less hippocampal dendritic spine loss and neuroinflammation.

Danielle A Simmons1, Frederick M Lartey2, Emil Schüler3, Marjan Rafat4, Gregory King3, Anna Kim3, Ryan Ko3, Sarah Semaan1, Selena Gonzalez1, Melissa Jenkins3, Pooja Pradhan3, Zion Shih3, Jinghui Wang3, Rie von Eyben3, Edward E Graves5, Peter G Maxim6, Frank M Longo7, Billy W Loo8.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the impact of ultra-rapid FLASH mouse whole brain irradiation on hippocampal dendritic spines and neuroinflammation, factors associated with cognitive impairment after brain irradiation.
METHODS: We administered 30 Gy whole brain irradiation to C57BL6/J mice in sub-second (FLASH) vs. 240 s conventional delivery time keeping all other parameters constant, using a custom configured clinical linac. Ten weeks post-irradiation, we evaluated spatial and non-spatial object recognition using novel object location and object recognition testing. We measured dendritic spine density by tracing Golgi-stained hippocampal neurons and evaluated neuroinflammation by CD68 immunostaining, a marker of activated microglia, and expression of 10 pro-inflammatory cytokines using a multiplex immunoassay.
RESULTS: At ten weeks post-irradiation, compared to unirradiated controls, conventional delivery time irradiation significantly impaired novel object location and recognition tasks whereas the same dose given in FLASH delivery did not. Conventional delivery time, but not FLASH, was associated with significant loss of dendritic spine density in hippocampal apical dendrites, with a similar non-significant trend in basal dendrites. Conventional delivery time was associated with significantly increased CD68-positive microglia compared to controls whereas FLASH was not. Conventional delivery time was associated with significant increases in 5 of 10 pro-inflammatory cytokines in the hippocampus (and non-significant increases in another 3), whereas FLASH was associated with smaller increases in only 3.
CONCLUSION: Reduced cognitive impairment and associated neurodegeneration were observed with FLASH compared to conventional delivery time irradiation, potentially through decreased induction of neuroinflammation, suggesting a promising approach to increasing therapeutic index in radiation therapy of brain tumors.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FLASH; Radiation-induced cognitive impairment; Ultra-rapid radiation; Whole brain irradiation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31253467     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  34 in total

1.  An ionizing radiation acoustic imaging (iRAI) technique for real-time dosimetric measurements for FLASH radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Oraiqat; Wei Zhang; Dale Litzenberg; Kwok Lam; Noora Ba Sunbul; Jean Moran; Kyle Cuneo; Paul Carson; Xueding Wang; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Maintenance of Tight Junction Integrity in the Absence of Vascular Dilation in the Brain of Mice Exposed to Ultra-High-Dose-Rate FLASH Irradiation.

Authors:  Barrett D Allen; Munjal M Acharya; Pierre Montay-Gruel; Patrik Goncalves Jorge; Claude Bailat; Benoît Petit; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles Limoli
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  A simulation study of ionizing radiation acoustic imaging (iRAI) as a real-time dosimetric technique for ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (UHDR-RT).

Authors:  Noora H Ba Sunbul; Wei Zhang; Ibrahim Oraiqat; Dale W Litzenberg; Kwok L Lam; Kyle Cuneo; Jean M Moran; Paul L Carson; Xueding Wang; Shaun D Clarke; Martha M Matuszak; Sara A Pozzi; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Organoids as Complex In Vitro Models for Studying Radiation-Induced Cell Recruitment.

Authors:  Benjamin C Hacker; Marjan Rafat
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.321

5.  Ultra-High-Dose-Rate FLASH Irradiation Limits Reactive Gliosis in the Brain.

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Mineh Markarian; Barrett D Allen; Jabra D Baddour; Erich Giedzinski; Patrik Goncalves Jorge; Benoît Petit; Claude Bailat; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles Limoli; Munjal M Acharya
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  The Importance and Clinical Implications of FLASH Ultra-High Dose-Rate Studies for Proton and Heavy Ion Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas W Colangelo; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Initial Steps Towards a Clinical FLASH Radiotherapy System: Pediatric Whole Brain Irradiation with 40 MeV Electrons at FLASH Dose Rates.

Authors:  Dylan Yamabe Breitkreutz; Muhammad Shumail; Karl K Bush; Sami G Tantawi; Peter G Maxime; Billy W Loo
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 8.  The importance of hypoxia in radiotherapy for the immune response, metastatic potential and FLASH-RT.

Authors:  Eui Jung Moon; Kristoffer Petersson; Monica M Olcina
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Neuroinflammation After Stereotactic Radiosurgery-Induced Brain Tumor Disintegration Is Linked to Persistent Cognitive Decline in a Mouse Model of Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Chengyan Chu; Catherine M Davis; Xiaoyan Lan; Robert D Hienz; Anna Jablonska; Aline M Thomas; Esteban Velarde; Shen Li; Miroslaw Janowski; Mihoko Kai; Piotr Walczak
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  ROAD: ROtational direct Aperture optimization with a Decoupled ring-collimator for FLASH radiotherapy.

Authors:  Qihui Lyu; Ryan Neph; Daniel O'Connor; Dan Ruan; Salime Boucher; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.