Literature DB >> 34431520

A simulation study of ionizing radiation acoustic imaging (iRAI) as a real-time dosimetric technique for ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (UHDR-RT).

Noora H Ba Sunbul1,2, Wei Zhang3, Ibrahim Oraiqat2,4, Dale W Litzenberg2, Kwok L Lam2, Kyle Cuneo2, Jean M Moran2, Paul L Carson3,5, Xueding Wang3,5, Shaun D Clarke1, Martha M Matuszak1,2, Sara A Pozzi1, Issam El Naqa2,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Electron-based ultra-high dose rate radiation therapy (UHDR-RT), also known as Flash-RT, has shown the ability to improve the therapeutic index in comparison to conventional radiotherapy (CONV-RT) through increased sparing of normal tissue. However, the extremely high dose rates in UHDR-RT have raised the need for accurate real-time dosimetry tools. This work aims to demonstrate the potential of the emerging technology of Ionized Radiation Acoustic Imaging (iRAI) through simulation studies and investigate its characteristics as a promising relative in vivo dosimetric tool for UHDR-RT.
METHODS: The detection of induced acoustic waves following a single UHDR pulse of a modified 6 MeV 21EX Varian Clinac in a uniform porcine gelatin phantom that is brain-tissue equivalent was simulated for an ideal ultrasound transducer. The full 3D dose distributions in the phantom for a 1 × 1 cm2 field were simulated using EGSnrc (BEAMnrc∖DOSXYZnrc) Monte Carlo (MC) codes. The relative dosimetry simulations were verified with dose experimental measurements using Gafchromic films. The spatial dose distribution was converted into an initial pressure source spatial distribution using the medium-dependent dose-pressure relation. The MATLAB-based toolbox k-Wave was then used to model the propagation of acoustic waves through the phantom and perform time-reversal (TR)-based imaging reconstruction. The effect of the various linear accelerator (linac) operating parameters, including linac pulse duration and pulse repetition rate (frequency), were investigated as well.
RESULTS: The MC dose simulation results agreed with the film measurement results, specifically at the central beam region up to 80% dose within approximately 5% relative error for the central profile region and a local relative error of <6% for percentage dose depth. IRAI-based FWHM of the radiation beam was within approximately 3 mm relative to the MC-simulated beam FWHM at the beam entrance. The real-time pressure signal change agreed with the dose changes proving the capability of the iRAI for predicting the beam position. IRAI was tested through 3D simulations of its response to be based on the temporal changes in the linac operating parameters on a dose per pulse basis as expected theoretically from the pressure-dose proportionality. The pressure signal amplitude obtained through 2D simulations was proportional to the dose per pulse. The instantaneous pressure signal amplitude decreases as the linac pulse duration increases, as predicted from the pressure wave generation equations, such that the shorter the linac pulse the higher the signal and the better the temporal (spatial) resolutions of iRAI. The effect of the longer linac pulse duration on the spatial resolution of the 3D constructed iRAI images was corrected for linac pulse deconvolution. This correction has improved the passing rate of the 1%/1 mm gamma test criteria, between the pressure-constructed and dosimetric beam characteristics, to as high as 98%.
CONCLUSIONS: A full simulation workflow was developed for testing the effectiveness of iRAI as a promising relative dosimetry tool for UHDR-RT radiation therapy. IRAI has shown the advantage of 3D dose mapping through the dose signal linearity and, hence, has the potential to be a useful dosimeter at depth dose measurement and beam localization and, hence, potentially for in vivo dosimetry in UHDR-RT.
© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo; UHDR (Flash) radiotherapy; in vivo dosimetry; radiation acoustics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34431520      PMCID: PMC8943858          DOI: 10.1002/mp.15188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  25 in total

1.  An ionizing radiation acoustic imaging (iRAI) technique for real-time dosimetric measurements for FLASH radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Oraiqat; Wei Zhang; Dale Litzenberg; Kwok Lam; Noora Ba Sunbul; Jean Moran; Kyle Cuneo; Paul Carson; Xueding Wang; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Effect of high dose per pulse flattening filter-free beams on cancer cell survival.

Authors:  Ines Lohse; Stephanie Lang; Jan Hrbacek; Stephan Scheidegger; Stephan Bodis; Nadia S Macedo; Jianhua Feng; Urs M Lütolf; Kathrin Zaugg
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Experimental Platform for Ultra-high Dose Rate FLASH Irradiation of Small Animals Using a Clinical Linear Accelerator.

Authors:  Emil Schüler; Stefania Trovati; Gregory King; Frederick Lartey; Marjan Rafat; Manuel Villegas; A Joe Praxel; Billy W Loo; Peter G Maxim
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Toward in vivo dosimetry in external beam radiotherapy using x-ray acoustic computed tomography: A soft-tissue phantom study validation.

Authors:  Hao Lei; Wei Zhang; Ibrahim Oraiqat; Zhipeng Liu; Jun Ni; Xueding Wang; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  X-rays can trigger the FLASH effect: Ultra-high dose-rate synchrotron light source prevents normal brain injury after whole brain irradiation in mice.

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Audrey Bouchet; Maud Jaccard; David Patin; Raphael Serduc; Warren Aim; Kristoffer Petersson; Benoit Petit; Claude Bailat; Jean Bourhis; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Marie-Catherine Vozenin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  GPU-accelerated 3D volumetric X-ray-induced acoustic computed tomography.

Authors:  Donghyun Lee; Eun-Yeong Park; Seongwook Choi; Hyeongsub Kim; Jung-Joon Min; Changho Lee; Chulhong Kim
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  The Advantage of FLASH Radiotherapy Confirmed in Mini-pig and Cat-cancer Patients.

Authors:  Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Pauline De Fornel; Kristoffer Petersson; Patrick Devauchelle; Jean Bourhis; Vincent Favaudon; Maud Jaccard; Jean-François Germond; Benoit Petit; Marco Burki; Gisèle Ferrand; David Patin; Hanan Bouchaab; Mahmut Ozsahin; François Bochud; Claude Bailat
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice.

Authors:  Vincent Favaudon; Laura Caplier; Virginie Monceau; Frédéric Pouzoulet; Mano Sayarath; Charles Fouillade; Marie-France Poupon; Isabel Brito; Philippe Hupé; Jean Bourhis; Janet Hall; Jean-Jacques Fontaine; Marie-Catherine Vozenin
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  A direct comparison of water calorimetry and Fricke dosimetry.

Authors:  C K Ross; N V Klassen; K R Shortt; G D Smith
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  X-ray induced acoustic computed tomography.

Authors:  P Samant; L Trevisi; X Ji; L Xiang
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2020-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.