Literature DB >> 32853387

Ultra-High-Dose-Rate FLASH Irradiation Limits Reactive Gliosis in the Brain.

Pierre Montay-Gruel1, Mineh Markarian1, Barrett D Allen1, Jabra D Baddour1, Erich Giedzinski1, Patrik Goncalves Jorge2, Benoît Petit2, Claude Bailat2, Marie-Catherine Vozenin2, Charles Limoli1, Munjal M Acharya1.   

Abstract

Encephalic radiation therapy delivered at a conventional dose rate (CONV, 0.1-2.0 Gy/min) elicits a variety of temporally distinct damage signatures that invariably involve persistent indications of neuroinflammation. Past work has shown an involvement of both the innate and adaptive immune systems in modulating the central nervous system (CNS) radiation injury response, where elevations in astrogliosis, microgliosis and cytokine signaling define a complex pattern of normal tissue toxicities that never completely resolve. These side effects constitute a major limitation in the management of CNS malignancies in both adult and pediatric patients. The advent of a novel ultra-high dose-rate irradiation modality termed FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT, instantaneous dose rates ≥106 Gy/s; 10 Gy delivered in 1-10 pulses of 1.8 µs) has been reported to minimize a range of normal tissue toxicities typically concurrent with CONV exposures, an effect that has been coined the "FLASH effect." Since the FLASH effect has now been found to significantly limit persistent inflammatory signatures in the brain, we sought to further elucidate whether changes in astrogliosis might account for the differential dose-rate response of the irradiated brain. Here we report that markers selected for activated astrogliosis and immune signaling in the brain (glial fibrillary acidic protein, GFAP; toll-like receptor 4, TLR4) are expressed at reduced levels after FLASH irradiation compared to CONV-irradiated animals. Interestingly, while FLASH-RT did not induce astrogliosis and TLR4, the expression level of complement C1q and C3 were found to be elevated in both FLASH and CONV irradiation modalities compared to the control. Although functional outcomes in the CNS remain to be cross-validated in response to the specific changes in protein expression reported, the data provide compelling evidence that distinguishes the dose-rate response of normal tissue injury in the irradiated brain. ©2020 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32853387      PMCID: PMC7856066          DOI: 10.1667/RADE-20-00067.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  48 in total

1.  Complement C3-Deficient Mice Fail to Display Age-Related Hippocampal Decline.

Authors:  Qiaoqiao Shi; Kenneth J Colodner; Sarah B Matousek; Katherine Merry; Soyon Hong; Jessica E Kenison; Jeffrey L Frost; Kevin X Le; Shaomin Li; Jean-Cosme Dodart; Barbara J Caldarone; Beth Stevens; Cynthia A Lemere
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Protoplasmic astrocytes in CA1 stratum radiatum occupy separate anatomical domains.

Authors:  Eric A Bushong; Maryann E Martone; Ying Z Jones; Mark H Ellisman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cytokine cascades in late normal tissue radiation responses.

Authors:  W H McBride
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-08-30       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  The Advantage of FLASH Radiotherapy Confirmed in Mini-pig and Cat-cancer Patients.

Authors:  Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Pauline De Fornel; Kristoffer Petersson; Patrick Devauchelle; Jean Bourhis; Vincent Favaudon; Maud Jaccard; Jean-François Germond; Benoit Petit; Marco Burki; Gisèle Ferrand; David Patin; Hanan Bouchaab; Mahmut Ozsahin; François Bochud; Claude Bailat
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Chemotaxis by a CNS macrophage, the microglia.

Authors:  J Yao; L Harvath; D L Gilbert; C A Colton
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Reduced cognitive deficits after FLASH irradiation of whole mouse brain are associated with less hippocampal dendritic spine loss and neuroinflammation.

Authors:  Danielle A Simmons; Frederick M Lartey; Emil Schüler; Marjan Rafat; Gregory King; Anna Kim; Ryan Ko; Sarah Semaan; Selena Gonzalez; Melissa Jenkins; Pooja Pradhan; Zion Shih; Jinghui Wang; Rie von Eyben; Edward E Graves; Peter G Maxim; Frank M Longo; Billy W Loo
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Complement activation in experimental and human temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  E Aronica; K Boer; E A van Vliet; S Redeker; J C Baayen; W G M Spliet; P C van Rijen; D Troost; F H Lopes da Silva; W J Wadman; J A Gorter
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 5.996

8.  Characterizing the radioresponse of pluripotent and multipotent human stem cells.

Authors:  Mary L Lan; Munjal M Acharya; Katherine K Tran; Jessica Bahari-Kashani; Neal H Patel; Jan Strnadel; Erich Giedzinski; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Gliotransmitters travel in time and space.

Authors:  Alfonso Araque; Giorgio Carmignoto; Philip G Haydon; Stéphane H R Oliet; Richard Robitaille; Andrea Volterra
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Cranial irradiation mediated spine loss is sex-specific and complement receptor-3 dependent in male mice.

Authors:  Joshua J Hinkle; John A Olschowka; Tanzy M Love; Jacqueline P Williams; M Kerry O'Banion
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Ultra-high dose rate electron beams and the FLASH effect: From preclinical evidence to a new radiotherapy paradigm.

Authors:  Emil Schüler; Munjal Acharya; Pierre Montay-Gruel; Billy W Loo; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Peter G Maxim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Ultra-high dose rate radiation production and delivery systems intended for FLASH.

Authors:  Jonathan Farr; Veljko Grilj; Victor Malka; Srinivasan Sudharsan; Marco Schippers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.506

3.  Parallels Between the Antiviral State and the Irradiated State.

Authors:  Heather M McGee; Ariel E Marciscano; Allison M Campbell; Arta M Monjazeb; Susan M Kaech; John R Teijaro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Breaking barriers: Neurodegenerative repercussions of radiotherapy induced damage on the blood-brain and blood-tumor barrier.

Authors:  Barrett D Allen; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 7.376

5.  Hypofractionated FLASH-RT as an Effective Treatment against Glioblastoma that Reduces Neurocognitive Side Effects in Mice.

Authors:  Pierre Montay-Gruel; Munjal M Acharya; Charles L Limoli; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Patrik Gonçalves Jorge; Benoît Petit; Ioannis G Petridis; Philippe Fuchs; Ron Leavitt; Kristoffer Petersson; Maude Gondré; Jonathan Ollivier; Raphael Moeckli; François Bochud; Claude Bailat; Jean Bourhis; Jean-François Germond
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 13.801

6.  Glia-Selective Deletion of Complement C1q Prevents Radiation-Induced Cognitive Deficits and Neuroinflammation.

Authors:  Mineh Markarian; Robert P Krattli; Jabra D Baddour; Leila Alikhani; Erich Giedzinski; Manal T Usmani; Anshu Agrawal; Janet E Baulch; Andrea J Tenner; Munjal M Acharya
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 13.312

Review 7.  Treatment of Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis.

Authors:  Xiaojing Yang; Hanru Ren; Jie Fu
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Comparable Long-Term Tumor Control for Hypofractionated FLASH Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy in an Immunocompetent Rat Glioma Model.

Authors:  Elise Konradsson; Emma Liljedahl; Emma Gustafsson; Gabriel Adrian; Sarah Beyer; Suhayb Ehsaan Ilaahi; Kristoffer Petersson; Crister Ceberg; Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-02

Review 9.  Mechanisms of FLASH effect.

Authors:  Binwei Lin; Dan Huang; Feng Gao; Yiwei Yang; Dai Wu; Yu Zhang; Gang Feng; Tangzhi Dai; Xiaobo Du
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.