Literature DB >> 31251643

Communicative Informativeness in Aphasia: Investigating the Relationship Between Linguistic and Perceptual Measures.

Janet Webster1, Julie Morris1.   

Abstract

Purpose Informativeness refers to how successfully a person is able to convey their intended message. This study explores the relationship between perceptual ratings of informativeness and selected linguistic measures of lexical and structural content. It considers which linguistic measures have ecological validity in terms of what listeners view as important. Method Two complex picture description samples from 20 people with aphasia were analyzed. Linguistic measures included number of correct information units (NCIU), percentage of correct information units, number of propositions (NP), propositional idea density (PID), and mean length of utterance in words (MLU-w). Eleven naïve listeners produced direct magnitude estimation (DME) ratings of informativeness. A correlational design was used to investigate the relationship between mean DME informativeness ratings and each of the linguistic measures. Results The 2 picture description samples elicited similar informativeness ratings. Positive significant correlations were identified between mean DME informativeness ratings and NCIU, percentage of correct information units, NP, and MLU-w; the strength of correlation differed across variables. No significant correlation was found between mean DME informativeness ratings and PID. Significant correlations were also seen between the linguistic variables, particularly between NP and PID as well as NP and MLU-w. Conclusions Overall, the linguistic measures corresponded to rated informativeness, highlighting their ecological validity. The strongest relationship was between NCIU and rated informativeness, emphasizing the importance of complete and accurate production of lexical information, particularly nouns. Less strong, but still significant, relationships were seen with variables looking at the efficiency of information giving and the connection of ideas within sentences. The importance of different types of informative measures is considered in relation to the elicitation stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31251643      PMCID: PMC6802921          DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  11 in total

1.  Social validity of changes in informativeness and efficiency of aphasic discourse following linguistic specific treatment (LST).

Authors:  B J Jacobs
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Direct magnitude estimates of speech intelligibility in dysarthria: effects of a chosen standard.

Authors:  Gary Weismer; Jacqueline S Laures
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Automatic measurement of propositional idea density from part-of-speech tagging.

Authors:  Cati Brown; Tony Snodgrass; Susan J Kemper; Ruth Herman; Michael A Covington
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-05

Review 4.  Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Lucy Bryant; Alison Ferguson; Elizabeth Spencer
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 1.346

5.  Application of the correct information unit analysis to the naturally occurring conversation of a person with aphasia.

Authors:  M L Oelschlaeger; J C Thorne
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Core-Lexicon and Main-Concept Production During Picture-Sequence Description in Adults Without Brain Damage and Adults With Aphasia.

Authors:  Sarah Grace Dalton; Jessica D Richardson
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Presence, completeness, and accuracy of main concepts in the connected speech of non-brain-damaged adults and adults with aphasia.

Authors:  L E Nicholas; R H Brookshire
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-02

8.  A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia.

Authors:  L E Nicholas; R H Brookshire
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-04

9.  An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers.

Authors:  K M Yorkston; D R Beukelman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1980-02

10.  Automated Proposition Density Analysis for Discourse in Aphasia.

Authors:  Davida Fromm; Joel Greenhouse; Kaiyue Hou; G Austin Russell; Xizhen Cai; Margaret Forbes; Audrey Holland; Brian MacWhinney
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  1 in total

1.  Spoken Discourse Assessment and Analysis in Aphasia: An International Survey of Current Practices.

Authors:  Brielle C Stark; Manaswita Dutta; Laura L Murray; Davida Fromm; Lucy Bryant; Tyson G Harmon; Amy E Ramage; Angela C Roberts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.674

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.