Literature DB >> 11412020

Social validity of changes in informativeness and efficiency of aphasic discourse following linguistic specific treatment (LST).

B J Jacobs1.   

Abstract

This study presents the results of an analysis of pragmatic aspects of language samples obtained from five agrammatic aphasic individuals prior to and following Linguistic Specific Treatment (LST). Clinically and statistically significant positive changes in informativeness and efficiency were documented in posttreatment samples. Analysis of communicative competence (i.e., naïve listeners' ratings of pre- and posttreatment audiotaped samples), was undertaken to examine the social validity of quantified changes. Mean ratings across listeners were computed to evaluate their subjective perceptions of general communicative constructs. Results indicated that objectively measured changes in pragmatic aspects were perceptible to naïve listeners, however, to varying degrees across participants and constructs. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11412020     DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  7 in total

1.  Aphasic speech with and without SentenceShaper: Two methods for assessing informativeness.

Authors:  Ruth B Fink; Megan R Bartlett; Jennifer S Lowery; Marcia C Linebarger; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.773

2.  Communicative Informativeness in Aphasia: Investigating the Relationship Between Linguistic and Perceptual Measures.

Authors:  Janet Webster; Julie Morris
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  TRAINING VERB PRODUCTION IN COMMUNICATIVE CONTEXT: EVIDENCE FROM A PERSON WITH CHRONIC NON-FLUENT APHASIA.

Authors:  Mira Goral; Daniel Kempler
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 2.773

4.  Informativeness ratings of messages created on an AAC processing prosthesis.

Authors:  Megan R Bartlett; Ruth B Fink; Myrna F Schwartz; Marcia Linebarger
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.773

5.  Creating a Theoretical Framework to Underpin Discourse Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia.

Authors:  Lucy Dipper; Jane Marshall; Mary Boyle; Deborah Hersh; Nicola Botting; Madeline Cruice
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-02

6.  The relationship between trained ratings and untrained listeners' judgments of global coherence in extended monologues.

Authors:  Yvonne Rogalski; Sarah Key-DeLyria; Sarah Mucci; Jonathan Wilson; Lori J P Altmann
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.773

7.  Rehabilitation of language in expressive aphasias: a literature review.

Authors:  Denise Ren da Fontoura; Jaqueline de Carvalho Rodrigues; Luciana Behs de Sá Carneiro; Ana Maria Monção; Jerusa Fumagalli de Salles
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.