Literature DB >> 34554878

Spoken Discourse Assessment and Analysis in Aphasia: An International Survey of Current Practices.

Brielle C Stark1, Manaswita Dutta2, Laura L Murray3, Davida Fromm4, Lucy Bryant5, Tyson G Harmon6, Amy E Ramage7, Angela C Roberts8.   

Abstract

Purpose Spoken discourse analysis is commonly employed in the assessment and treatment of people living with aphasia, yet there is no standardization in assessment, analysis, or reporting procedures, thereby precluding comparison/meta-analyses of data and hindering replication of findings. An important first step is to identify current practices in collecting and analyzing spoken discourse in aphasia. Thus, this study surveyed current practices, with the goal of working toward standardizing spoken discourse assessment first in research settings with subsequent implementation into clinical settings. Method A mixed-methods (quantitative and qualitative) survey was publicized to researchers and clinicians around the globe who have collected and/or analyzed spoken discourse data in aphasia. The survey data were collected between September and November 2019. Results Of the 201 individuals who consented to participate, 189 completed all mandatory questions in the survey (with fewer completing nonmandatory response questions). The majority of respondents reported barriers to utilizing discourse including transcription, coding, and analysis. The most common barrier was time (e.g., lack of time). Respondents also indicated that there was a lack of, and a need for, psychometric properties and normative data for spoken discourse use in the assessment and treatment of persons with aphasia. Quantitative and qualitative results are described in detail. Conclusions The current survey study evaluated spoken discourse methods in aphasia across research and clinical settings. Findings from this study will be used to guide development of process standardization in spoken discourse and for the creation of a psychometric and normative property database. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.166395100.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34554878      PMCID: PMC9132151          DOI: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.674


  43 in total

Review 1.  Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia.

Authors:  Madeleine Pritchard; Katerina Hilari; Naomi Cocks; Lucy Dipper
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Automated Speech Recognition in Adult Stroke Survivors: Comparing Human and Computer Transcriptions.

Authors:  Adam Jacks; Katarina L Haley; Gary Bishop; Tyson G Harmon
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 0.849

3.  Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Core Lexicon Measure as a Measure of Word Retrieval Ability in Aphasia Narratives.

Authors:  Hana Kim; Heather Harris Wright
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia.

Authors:  L E Nicholas; R H Brookshire
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-04

Review 5.  Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia.

Authors:  Suzanne Beeke; Jane Maxim; Ray Wilkinson
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.761

Review 6.  Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI.

Authors:  Thomas E Nichols; Samir Das; Simon B Eickhoff; Alan C Evans; Tristan Glatard; Michael Hanke; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Michael P Milham; Russell A Poldrack; Jean-Baptiste Poline; Erika Proal; Bertrand Thirion; David C Van Essen; Tonya White; B T Thomas Yeo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  A Comparison of Three Discourse Elicitation Methods in Aphasia and Age-Matched Adults: Implications for Language Assessment and Outcome.

Authors:  Brielle C Stark
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.

Authors:  Marian C Brady; Helen Kelly; Jon Godwin; Pam Enderby; Pauline Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-01

10.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.