Literature DB >> 26140462

Core-Lexicon and Main-Concept Production During Picture-Sequence Description in Adults Without Brain Damage and Adults With Aphasia.

Sarah Grace Dalton, Jessica D Richardson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to identify the core lexicon of a picture-description task using transcripts from the AphasiaBank database and to determine differences in core-lexicon usage between control speakers and persons with aphasia (PWAs). We also investigated the relationship between core lexicon and an established discourse measure, main-concept analysis.
METHOD: A core lexicon was developed by identifying lemmas produced by 92 control speakers. Transcripts were scored-165 control transcripts and 238 PWA transcripts-using the core lexicon and a recently developed main-concept list. Median tests examined differences between controls, PWAs, and aphasia subtypes. Spearman's correlations assessed the relationship between core-lexicon and main-concept performance.
RESULTS: A 24-item core lexicon was identified. Significant differences were found between control speakers and PWAs, and between aphasia subtypes, for core-lexicon and main-concept scores. Core-lexicon and main-concept performance was significantly and positively correlated for all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: We report the development of a core lexicon, differences in core-lexicon usage between speakers, and the relationship between core-lexicon and main-concept scores. Research is needed to determine the clinical utility and psychometric properties of these discourse measures and their potential contribution to multilevel discourse analysis of functional communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26140462     DOI: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  12 in total

1.  Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Core Lexicon Measure as a Measure of Word Retrieval Ability in Aphasia Narratives.

Authors:  Hana Kim; Heather Harris Wright
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  A Large-Scale Comparison of Main Concept Production Between Persons With Aphasia and Persons Without Brain Injury.

Authors:  Sarah Grace Hudspeth Dalton; Jessica D Richardson
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Communicative Informativeness in Aphasia: Investigating the Relationship Between Linguistic and Perceptual Measures.

Authors:  Janet Webster; Julie Morris
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  An efficient, accurate and clinically-applicable index of content word fluency in Aphasia.

Authors:  Reem S W Alyahya; Paul Conroy; Ajay D Halai; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 1.902

5.  An Integrative Analysis of Spontaneous Storytelling Discourse in Aphasia: Relationship With Listeners' Rating and Prediction of Severity and Fluency Status of Aphasia.

Authors:  Anthony Pak-Hin Kong; Cherie Wan-Yin Wong
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Using AphasiaBank for Discourse Assessment.

Authors:  Davida Fromm; Margaret Forbes; Audrey Holland; Brian MacWhinney
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 1.761

7.  The Relationship Between Confrontation Naming and Story Gist Production in Aphasia.

Authors:  Jessica D Richardson; Sarah Grace Dalton; Davida Fromm; Margaret Forbes; Audrey Holland; Brian MacWhinney
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Discourse Characteristics in Aphasia Beyond the Western Aphasia Battery Cutoff.

Authors:  Davida Fromm; Margaret Forbes; Audrey Holland; Sarah Grace Dalton; Jessica Richardson; Brian MacWhinney
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Development of a measure of function word use in narrative discourse: core lexicon analysis in aphasia.

Authors:  Hana Kim; Stephen Kintz; Heather Harris Wright
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 10.  AphasiaBank as BigData.

Authors:  Brian MacWhinney; Davida Fromm
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.