Eyal Geisler1,2, Anne Bogler1, Eyal Rahav3, Edo Bar-Zeev4. 1. Zuckerberg Institute for Water Research (ZIWR), The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research (BIDR) Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer Campus, 84990, Israel. 2. Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, National Institute of Oceanography, Haifa, 8030, Israel. 3. Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, National Institute of Oceanography, Haifa, 8030, Israel. eyal.rahav@ocean.org.il. 4. Zuckerberg Institute for Water Research (ZIWR), The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research (BIDR) Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer Campus, 84990, Israel. barzeeve@bgu.ac.il.
Abstract
N2 fixation by planktonic heterotrophic diazotrophs is more wide spread than previously thought, including environments considered "unfavorable" for diazotrophy. These environments include a substantial fraction of the aquatic biosphere such as eutrophic estuaries with high ambient nitrogen concentrations and oxidized aphotic water. Different studies suggested that heterotrophic diazotrophs associated with aggregates may promote N2 fixation in such environments. However, this association was never validated directly and relies mainly on indirect relationships and different statistical approaches. Here, we identified, for the first time, a direct link between active heterotrophic diazotrophs and aggregates that comprise polysaccharides. Our new staining method combines fluorescent tagging of active diazotrophs by nitrogenase-immunolabeling, polysaccharides staining by Alcian blue or concanavalin-A, and total bacteria via nucleic-acid staining. Concomitant to N2 fixation rates and bacterial activity, this new method provided specific localization of heterotrophic diazotrophs on artificial and natural aggregates. We postulate that the insights gained by this new visualization approach will have a broad significance for future research on the aquatic nitrogen cycle, including environments in which diazotrophy has traditionally been overlooked.
N2 fixation by planktonic heterotrophicdiazotrophs is more wide spread than previously thought, including environments considered "unfavorable" for diazotrophy. These environments include a substantial fraction of the aquatic biosphere such as eutrophic estuaries with high ambient nitrogenconcentrations and oxidized aphoticwater. Different studies suggested that heterotrophicdiazotrophs associated with aggregates may promote N2 fixation in such environments. However, this association was never validated directly and relies mainly on indirect relationships and different statistical approaches. Here, we identified, for the first time, a direct link between active heterotrophicdiazotrophs and aggregates that comprise polysaccharides. Our new staining method combines fluorescent tagging of active diazotrophs by nitrogenase-immunolabeling, polysaccharides staining by Alcian blue or concanavalin-A, and total bacteria via nucleic-acid staining. Concomitant to N2 fixation rates and bacterial activity, this new method provided specific localization of heterotrophicdiazotrophs on artificial and natural aggregates. We postulate that the insights gained by this new visualization approach will have a broad significance for future research on the aquaticnitrogencycle, including environments in which diazotrophy has traditionally been overlooked.
Biological dinitrogen (N2) fixation is an important source of new bioavailable nitrogen in many marine and freshwater environments[1,2]. This process is carried out by a specialized subgroup of prokaryotic organisms termed diazotrophs, and primarily hindered by four key factors: (i) insufficient metabolic energy required to sustain the nitrogenase activity[3-5]; (ii) limited availability of different vitamins (e.g., cobalamin)[6] and other micronutrients (e.g., Fe and Mo) required for the nitrogenase complex[7,8]; (iii) oxidized environments that irreversibly damage the nitrogenase enzyme[9-11]; and (iv) inhibitory (high) concentrations of dissolved inorganic nitrogen[12,13].Recent studies indicate that planktonic heterotrophicdiazotrophs are highly diverse[14-16], and fix N2 in environments characterized by one or more of the conditions considered adverse for diazotrophy. These environments include oxygenated waters[17-20], aphotic (dark) oxygen-minimum zones[21-25], and N-rich ecosystems[14,16,26-28]. Currently, the mechanisms explaining how heteroterotrophicdiazotrophscope with these unfavaroble conditions are not entirely clear. It was previously hypothesized that heterotrophicdiazotrophs may benefit from the association with transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) as microenvironments that enable them to fix N2 even in unfavorable marine/freshwater regimes[17]. TEP are clear and sticky acidicpolysaccharides, ranging in size from ~0.4 μm to 300 µm, and found at high concentrations across the aquatic environment[29-34]. The C:N ratio of TEP is often high and range from ~7 to 21 (average ~16:1) compared to the ~6.6:1 Redfield ratio[35-39]. TEP often act as a scaffold, holding together different organic and inorganic particles that form larger (>0.5 mm) aggregates[40-42]. These free-floating aggregates, also known as marine/river/lake “snow”, are ubiquitous throughout the aquatic environment[36,43-45]. Planktonic aggregates are heavily colonized by various microorganisms such as eukaryoticalgae, fungi, bacteria, archaea and cyanobacteria[34,46-48]. Prokaryotic microorganisms that colonize aggregates solubilize and remineralize organic matter at high rates[49] via a wide range of hydrolytic ecto-enzymes[50-52]. Such aggregates are therefore considered as “hotspots” for intense microbial activity[33,53,54] and potentially also for N2 fixation by diazotrophs[16,17,19,34,55].Previous studies based the association of aggregates and heterotrophicdiazotrophs on indirect links, including unspecificbacterial staining and statistical approaches[17,25,55-57]. In this study, we identified, for the first time, a direct link between heterotrophicN2 fixation and aggregates that comprise polysaccharides (such as TEP). To this end, we developed a new staining method that localizes heterotrophicdiazotrophs by immunolabeling the nitrogenase enzyme, polysaccharides that form the aggregate matrix by Alcian blue and concanavalin-A staining, as well as total bacteria by DNA staining. This new staining approach, together with other analytical assays, was tested using a model heterotrophicdiazotroph (Vibrio natriegens) and validated in a natural eutrophicN-rich estuary ecosystem.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial strains and experimental media
Monoculture experiments were performed using V. natriegens (ATCC 14048) as a model heterotrophicdiazotroph[58,59]. Monocultures of Escherichia coli (ATCC 11303) were also used as a negative, non-diazotrophiccontrol. V. natriegens and E. coli were cultivated in artificial brackish water supplemented with glucose (5 g L−1) and ammonium chloride (1.5 mg L−1 NH4Cl). Further details are provided in the Supporting Information (SI).
Controlled laboratory experiments
A starter culture of V. natriegens (25–30 mL) was grown overnight to ~0.8–1.2 (OD600 nm) in a Luria-Bertani broth (LB) medium (LB, Merck Millipore, USA) with 1.5% NaCl. The cultures were then diluted to an early exponential growth phase (OD600 nm, 0.4–0.6) at 26 °C. The LB was removed after centrifugation (1500 g for 6 min) and V. natriegensbacteria were re-suspended in artificial brackish water (25 mL). V. natriegenscells were then transferred to sterile 1-L microcosm bottles with artificial brackish water in a ratio of 1:20 (vol:vol). The microcosm bottles were then supplemented with gum xanthan (GX, final concentration of 600 μg L−1) as an artificial polysaccharide and incubated either under aerobic or anaerobicconditions. Unamended microcosm bottles (without GX) were used as control. Three out of the four microcosms of each treatment were enriched with 15N2 and incubated for 48 h under dark conditions at 26 °C with gentle shaking. Bacterial abundance (BA) and bacterial production (BP) rates were measured at the conclusion of the incubation (detailed below). N2 fixation rates and immunolabeling of the nitrogenase protein were also determined at the conclusion of the experiment. Simultaneous experiments were carried out with the non-diazotrophicE. coli (i.e., without the nitrogenase enzyme) as a negative control. These experiments were performed to refute unspecificnitrogenase tagging.
Field samplings in the Qishon estuary
Surface (~0.3 m) saline water was collected from the Qishon estuary (32°48′42.0″N, 35°02′00.7″E) during the winter (February 2018). The collected water was divided into four pre-cleaned (10% HCl and autoclaved) 1-L Nalgene bottles. Three bottles were enriched with ultra-pure 15N2water (detailed below), while the forth bottle was used to measure the natural abundance of dissolved 15N2 (i.e., no isotope addition). All bottles were supplemented with 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU, final concentration of 100 nM, Sigma-Aldrich D2425) and covered with an aluminum foil to impair photosynthetic activity[18,20,34,60]. The microcosm bottles were incubated at ambient temperature in dark conditions for 48 h.
Tagging active heterotrophic diazotrophs associated with artificial and natural aggregates
Visualizing V. natriegens monocultures associated with artificial TEP surrogates
Subsamples (3 mL) of V. natriegens or E. coli were collected at the end of the incubation and filtered through a 0.4 µm polycarbonate filter (GVS, Life Sciences, USA) using low vacuum pressure (<150 mbar) (Fig. 1A). Filters with bacteria were fixed overnight in chilled ethanol (5 mL), while residues were removed at the end of the incubation by a gentle filtration (<150 mbar). V. natriegens (or E. coli) cells were permeabilized by 1 mL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 0.5%, Merck Millipore 102952) for 15 min at room temperature and washed three times with 5 mL of phosphate buffered saline enriched with triton (PBST, 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, pH 7.2, Sigma Aldrich)[61]. Cells were then incubated for 5 min in PBST. An anti-NifH (Agrisera-AS01 021A, Sweden) solution (6 µg mL−1) that binds to the nitrogenase enzyme was freshly prepared. The anti-NifH solution was diluted in PBS-bovine albumin serum (PBS-BSA, 1 mg mL−1, Sigma Aldrich A2153) to minimize unspecific antibody binding. The cells were incubated for 1 h in the dark with the primary anti-NifH antibody to tag the nitrogenase enzyme. Filters with tagged cells were washed with PBST as described above before an anti-chicken antigen conjugated to a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) fluorophore (6 μg mL−1, Thermo Fisher Scientific A-11039) was added and incubated in the dark for 45 min. This florescent secondary antibody was specifically linked to the primary antibody and used to visualize (spectra is detailed below) the presence of the nitrogenase enzyme. Any antibody residues were discarded with PBST as described above. The washing efficiency of the secondary antibody was tested to verify that the fluorescence resulted only from a successful connection between the antibodies (Fig. S1).
Figure 1
Overview of the immunolabeling staining approach used in this study for monocultures (A) and natural (B) populations capturing heterotrophic diazotrophs associated with bioaggregates.
Overview of the immunolabeling staining approach used in this study for monocultures (A) and natural (B) populations capturing heterotrophicdiazotrophs associated with bioaggregates.In the second stage, the immunolabeled samples were stained for TEP using an Alcian blue solution (4%) for 10 sec similarly to Bar-Zeev et al.[48]. The samples were then washed with 5 mL of double distilled water (DDW) to remove any residues of Alcian blue stain that were not adsorbed to the polysaccharides. In the third stage, the immunolabeled and TEP-stained samples were incubated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole solution (DAPI, 250 µg mL−1, Thermo Fisher ScientificD1306) for 20 min to visualize all the bacterial cells[33]. The DAPI excess was removed with 5 mL of PBS.Finally, each filter with the immunolabeled-stained sample was placed (face-down) for 3 min on a poly-L-lysine (P8290, Sigma Aldrich) coated microscope slide (detailed in the Supporting Information). The samples remained attached to the poly-L-lysinecoating while the filter was gently removed. The attached cells and aggregates were covered with a cover slip (2 × 1 cm) and sealed with nail-polish to minimize dehydration. Each sample was examined with a Nikon Eclipse Ci epifluorescence microscope. TEP were visualized under a bright field light while fluorescence was used to identify total bacteria (DAPI; Ex 350 nm, Em 450 nm) and the immunolabeled nitrogenase enzyme (FITC; Ex 495 nm, Em 519 nm).
Localizing heterotrophic diazotrophs that colonize aggregates in aquatic environments
Water samples (5 mL) from the Qishon estuary were stained similarly to the protocol described above with a few modifications (Fig. 1B). Initially, the samples were incubated in the dark and supplemented with DCMU (100 nM) to hinder active phototrophicdiazotrophs that may have been present in the ambient water[20,62,63]. The incubation time of the DAPI stain was increased to 45 min to ensure the diffusion of the dye into large aggregates (>0.5 mm). Polysaccharides were stained with the fluorescent lectin, concanavalin A (200 µg L−1, Ex 630 nm, Em 647 nm, Thermo Fisher ScientificC11252) for 40 min and washed with 5 mL of PBS. Stained samples were imaged with a Zeiss confocal laser scanning microscope, CLSM (LSM 510 Meta) equipped with a 405 nm diode and 488 nm argon as well as 633 nm helium-neon lasers. Concurrently, the samples were stained with Alcian blue and imaged via bright field mode to identify TEP (Fig. S2). Heterotrophicbacteria were distinguished from phototrophiccyanobacteria by subtraction of the auto-fluorescence of phycoerythrin (Ex 490 nm, Em 580 nm) as an indicative pigment (Fig. S3).
Analytical approaches
N2 fixation rate
Measurements were done as described by Mohr et al.[64]. Briefly, an enriched 15N2 medium was prepared by injecting 15N2 gas (99%, Cambridge Isotopes) into pre-filtered (0.2 µm) artificial medium at a 1:100 (vol:vol) ratio. The enriched stock was vigorously shaken to completely dissolve the 15N2 gas bubble, and then added to the experimental bottles (0.5% and 5% of monoculture media and Qishon sample volume, respectively[18]). This procedure assured adequate equilibration of the 15N2 with the media/estuary water. Following two days of dark incubation, the samples were filtered through pre-combusted 25-mm GF/F (450 °C, 4.5 h) and dried overnight at 60 °C. The samples were analyzed on a Thermo-Finningan Delta Plus XP isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) interfaced to a CE Instruments NC2500 elemental analyzer. A standard curve to determine N mass was done with each sample run. The detection limit was 0.02 nmol N L−1 d−1.
Bacterial production (BP)
Rates were measured using the incorporated [4,5-3H]-leucine method (Amersham, specific activity of 160 Ci nmol−1) according to Simon et al.[65]. Samples were incubated with 2 nmol leucine L−1 (final concentration) in rotation for 3 h at ~25 °C and dark conditions. Incorporation of leucine was converted to carbon by a conservative factor of 3.1 kg C mol−1 with an isotope dilution of 2.0[66].
Bacterial abundance (BA)
Collected samples (1.7 mL) were fixed with 0.2% glutaraldehyde (Sigma Aldrich) for 10 min and stored at −80 °C. Prior to counting, samples were fast-thawed at 26 °C, and bioaggregates were dismantled using 25 mM of EDTA and sonication. Samples were stained with 0.5 nM of SYBR® Green II RNA Gel Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific S7564) in the dark for 15 min[67]. Subsamples (150 µL) were analyzed with an Attune-Next acoustic focusing flow cytometer (Applied Biosystems) equipped with a syringe-based fluidic system at 408 and 488 nm wavelengths at a flow rate of 25 µL min−1 [68]. Beads (nominal size 0.93 µm) (Polysciences) were used as a size standard.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using an Excel add-in XLSTAT 2018 software. The differences between treatments (Control, +GX, under anaerobic and aerobicconditions) were evaluated using ANOVA following Fisher post-hoc test with a confidence level of 95%. For the Qishon microcosms, the differences between the ambient (unamended) and the +GX waters were evaluated using a t-test with a confidence level of 95%.
Results and Discussion
Immunolocalization and N2 fixation of V. natriegens diazotrophs associated with TEP
Planktonic heterotrophicdiazotrophs such as V. natriegens are ubiquitous facultative anaerobes[58] that can be cultivated with simple carbon molecules such as glucose or sucrose[59,69]. N2 fixation by V. natriegenscan be hindered by low availability of organiccarbon sources and/or high concentrations of dissolved inorganic nitrogen[1,70,71]. Previous reports have suggested that heterotrophicdiazotrophs associated with TEP may explain N2 fixation rates in aquatic environments with adverse conditions for diazotrophy[16,17]. Yet, no direct link was previously found between heterotrophicdiazotrophs and aquatic aggregates. Our newly developed staining method is the first to provide a direct link between active heterotrophicdiazotrophs and aggregates comprising polysaccharides such as TEP (Figs 2 and 3).
Figure 2
Visualization of V. natriegens as a model heterotrophic diazotroph, TEP and total bacteria using the newly develop triple-staining method. Images were captured under anaerobic conditions with media only (A–D) or following the addition of GX (E–H). TEP were stained by Alcian blue (A,E), while total bacteria were stained with DAPI (B,F), and the nitrogenase enzyme was tagged by immunolabeling (C,G). Images were stacked and superimposed using an ImageJ software (D,H).
Figure 3
Images of V. natriegens and E. coli under aerobic conditions, with or without GX, captured by epifluorescence microscopy. TEP stained with alcian blue (A,E,I; light blue); total bacteria stained with DAPI (B,F,J; blue); active diazotrophs tagged by nitrogenase immunolabeling (C,G,K; green). Superimposed images were done using ImageJ software (D,H,L).
Visualization of V. natriegens as a model heterotrophicdiazotroph, TEP and total bacteria using the newly develop triple-staining method. Images were captured under anaerobicconditions with media only (A–D) or following the addition of GX (E–H). TEP were stained by Alcian blue (A,E), while total bacteria were stained with DAPI (B,F), and the nitrogenase enzyme was tagged by immunolabeling (C,G). Images were stacked and superimposed using an ImageJ software (D,H).Images of V. natriegens and E. coli under aerobicconditions, with or without GX, captured by epifluorescence microscopy. TEP stained with alcian blue (A,E,I; light blue); total bacteria stained with DAPI (B,F,J; blue); active diazotrophs tagged by nitrogenase immunolabeling (C,G,K; green). Superimposed images were done using ImageJ software (D,H,L).Under anaerobicconditions with no addition of GX (i.e., artificial TEP), the nitrogenase enzyme of V. natriegens was captured within most of the cells using our new staining approach (Fig. 2A–C). Concomitant measurements of N2 fixation and BP rates were normalized to bacterial cells (2 to 5.7 × 1010 cells L−1), resulting in specific rates per cell. SpecificN2 fixation ranged from 1.2 to 3.9 × 10−4 fg Ncell−1 d−1 and specificBP ranged from ~1.4 to 7.1 fg C d−1 (Table 1, n = 9). These measurements, together with the immunolabeling technique (Fig. 2C), indicate that under anaerobicconditions V. natriegens were active, synthesizing the nitrogenase enzyme and fixing N2.
Table 1
Average N2 fixation, bacterial production (BP) and bacterial abundance (BA) of V. natriegens under different aeration conditions and with or without the addition of GX.
Aeration
Treatment
N2 fixation (nmole N L−1 d−1)
BP (µg C L−1 d−1)
BA (×1010 Cells L−1)
Specific N2 fixation (×10−4 fg N Cell−1 d−1)
Specific BP (fg C Cell−1 d−1)
Anaerobic
Control
3.8 ± 1.5a,b
94.5 ± 44.2a
2.5 ± 0.4a
2.1 ± 0.8a
3.8 ± 1.5a
GX
5.9 ± 2.1b,c
68.4 ± 33.0b
3.0 ± 1.1a
2.8 ± 1a
1.9 ± 1.1b
Aerobic
Control
3.9 ± 1.0a
140.6 ± 36.5c
7.1 ± 2.5b
0.7 ± 0.2b
2.0 ± 0.5b
GX
4.2 ± 0.5a,b
130.9 ± 25.5c
7.4 ± 1.7b
0.8 ± 0.1b
1.8 ± 0.4c
Specific N2 fixation rates and specific bacterial production rates were calculated by normalizing N2 fixation and BP to BA. *The superscripts letters (a,b,c) indicate a significant difference for mean values additions (one-way ANOVA and a Fisher LSD post hoc test, P < 0.05).
Average N2 fixation, bacterial production (BP) and bacterial abundance (BA) of V. natriegens under different aeration conditions and with or without the addition of GX.SpecificN2 fixation rates and specificbacterial production rates were calculated by normalizing N2 fixation and BP to BA. *The superscripts letters (a,b,c) indicate a significant difference for mean values additions (one-way ANOVA and a Fisher LSD post hoc test, P < 0.05).Incubation of V. natriegens with GX for 48 h under anaerobicconditions resulted in the formation of aggregates that comprised TEP (Fig. 2E). Most of the active V. natriegenscells (with the nitrogenase enzyme) were found to be associated with the TEP-aggregates forming dense diazotrophicclusters (Fig. 2G,H). In addition, GX amendments increased N2 fixation rates (55%) and BA (20%), while BP was reduced (28%) relative to the control experiments (Table 1). SpecificN2 fixation rates were also higher (33%) following incubation with GX, while BP rates per cell remained significantly lower than the control (Table 1). BP often indicates on the assimilation rates of organiccarbon into bacterial biomass[34]. Thus, we suggest that low BP rates and increased N2 fixation rates (compared to the control) indicated that additional carbon source following polysaccharide hydrolysis[56,72] was mostly utilized to support nitrogenase activity rather than bacterial growth.Additional experiments under aerobic (O2-saturated) conditions with V. natriegens were also carried out in media only (control) or following the addition of GX (Fig. 3, Table 1). Under control conditions (no GX addition) only sparse extracellular polymeric substances (consisting of polysaccharides) were found to be stained with Alcian blue although bacteria were highly abundant (Fig. 3A,B). PlanktonicV. natriegenscells were sporadically captured with the nitrogenase enzyme (Fig. 3C,D). Under these conditions N2 fixation rates by V. natriegens remained similar to those measured under anaerobicconditions (Table 1). Concomitant BP rates and BA values were significantly higher (50% and 280%, respectively) than those measured under anaerobicconditions (Table 1). Conversely, cell specificBP and N2 fixation rates were substantially lower (47% and 67%, respectively) compared to the anaerobicconditions (Table 1). As facultative anaerobes, V. natriegens gain more energy-rich molecules under aerobicconditions (e.g., ATP and NADPH) compared to anaerobicconditions, thus may enhance bacterial growth rates (measured as increased BA). However, under aerobicconditions it is likely that V. natriegens allocated metabolic energy to protect the nitrogenase enzyme from O2 damages[10,73], leading to lower carbon assimilation (BP) per cell compared to the anaerobic rates, yet measurable N2 fixation (Table 1).Under aerobicconditions and following incubation with GX, we rarely detected planktoniccells that translated the nitrogenase enzyme (Fig. 3E–H). Instead, most V. natriegenscells with the nitrogenase enzyme formed dense clusters associated with TEP (Fig. 3H). Concomitant measurements of N2 fixation, BP and BA were all comparable to the values found in the aerobiccontrol. Similar results were also found for the cell-specificN2 fixation and BP rates (Table 1). Nonetheless, compared to the anaerobicconditions, BP and BA were ~2 fold higher, while N2 fixation rates remained lower (29%) following the addition of GX (Table 1). We surmise that the artificial TEP (GX) aggregates formed in these experiments did not provide additional advantage to N2 fixation under aerobicconditions. We suggest that since these aggregates were overall small (<300 µm), O2concentrations within the particles were similar to the surrounding environment. Nonetheless, it is possible that larger aggregates may provide conditions with reduced O2concentrations that benefit heterotrophicdiazotrophs as previously reported by Klawonn et al.[74].In addition to the above, E. coli as non-diazotrophicbacteria were grown under aerobicconditions with or without GX for 48 h and used as a negative control (Fig. 3I–L). These experiments were performed to estimate whether unspecific tagging of the primary and secondary antibodies to the cells or TEP occurred. As expected, following the staining of E. colicells, no green florescence was visible (Fig. 3K).
Localizing heterotrophic diazotrophs associated with natural aggregates using the Qishon Estuary as a case study
The Qishon estuary system is defined as a hyper-eutrophic environment that flow into the Haifa Bay, southeastern Mediterranean Sea[34,75]. Nutrient concentrations during the sampling period in the Qishon estuary were an order of magnitude higher (TN 5.8 mg L−1, TP 0.4 mg L−1, TOC 72 mg L−1) than the southeastern Mediterranean Sea[76,77]. During the winter sampling, total BA was 3.5 × 109 cells L−1, while BP rates were 80.2 µg C L−1 d−1. In addition, heterotrophicN2 fixation rates were 0.96 nmol N L−1 d−1 following dark incubation with DCMU which have likely impaired the activity of phototrophs[18,34]. These N2 fixation rates were ~2–3 fold higher than previous reports from the southeastern Mediterranean Sea, despite the high concentrations of ambient TN[58,77-79] that should suppress diazotrophy[13].In aquatic environment such as the Qishon estuary, diazotrophs often comprise a diverse community which include archaea and heterotrophicbacteria[14,16], as well as phototrophs in the form of filamentous and/or unicellular cyanobacteria[13,71]. In agreement with these reports, we found that these aggregates comprised complex microbial communities, including various prokaryotic microorganisms (identified via DAPI staining), cyanobacteria (characterized by the auto-fluorescence of phycoerythrin), as well as active diazotrophs (localized by nitrogenase immunolabeling). These complex microbial communities were embedded in a polysaccharide matrix (detected by a fluorescent lectin) and colonized the entire aggregate with no specific pattern (Fig. 4).
Figure 4
Two examples of natural diazotrophs associated with aggregates collected from the Qishon estuary and captured by CLSM. Diazotrophs that have synthesized the nitrogenase enzyme were tagged by immunolabeling (A, green), cyanobacteria were identified with phycoerythrin (B, orange), total bacteria with DAPI (C, blue), and polysaccharides were stained with Con A (D, light blue). Superimposed three-dimension images of the different stains were made using Zen software.
Two examples of natural diazotrophs associated with aggregates collected from the Qishon estuary and captured by CLSM. Diazotrophs that have synthesized the nitrogenase enzyme were tagged by immunolabeling (A, green), cyanobacteria were identified with phycoerythrin (B, orange), total bacteria with DAPI (C, blue), and polysaccharides were stained with Con A (D, light blue). Superimposed three-dimension images of the different stains were made using Zen software.Immunolabeling the nitrogenase enzyme is not specific to heterotrophicdiazotrophs and may tag phototrophicdiazotrophs as well (Fig. 4A, top panel). Differentiating and localizing active heterotrophicdiazotrophs was achieved via the following: (i) Suppression of phototrophicdiazotrophs by incubating the samples in the dark for 48 h with a photosynthetic inhibitor (DCMU)[60]. We surmised that these conditions would reduce the activity and biosynthesis of the nitrogenase by phototrophicdiazotrophs due to the lack of metabolic energy[18,20,56]. (ii) Matching images of the phycoerythrin pigment auto-fluorescence were captured from each sample to identify any cyanobacteria that could potentially fix N2 (Fig. 4B, top panel). (iii) Overlapping images of cyanobacteria (orange) by immunolabeled (green) and total microorganisms (blue) enabled the specific identification of heterotrophicbacteria that translated the nitrogenase protein. (iv) The spatial location of these heterotrophicdiazotrophs on the aggregate was attained by superimposing the previous stack with images of fluorescent polysaccharides (light blue) (Fig. 4D). Applying this new method to natural water samples together with 15N2 assays indicated that planktonic aggregates from the Qishon estuary were colonized by heterotrophicdiazotrophs that were actively synthesizing the nitrogenase enzyme.
Conclusions
Recent studies suggested that heterotrophicdiazotrophs are more widely distributed than previously thought, fixing N2 in “unfavorable” aquatic environments. These studies suggested that in such environments N2 fixation is mainly performed by heterotrophicdiazotrophs that colonize bioaggregates comprising polysaccharides such as TEP. However, to date, no direct link between heterotrophicdiazotrophy and bioaggregates was ever established and only indirect evidence, namely correlations between TEP and N2 fixation rates, has been shown. Here, we introduce a newly developed staining approach that directly link active heterotrophicdiazotrophs (as well as phototrophicdiazotrophs) to aggregates. We show that this new method provides specific spatial localization of heterotrophicdiazotrophs on artificial and natural aggregates comprising polysaccharides. Nonetheless, the specificN2 fixation rates by diazotrophs associated with aggregates cannot be estimated using this approach. To date, it is possible to compliment this method with size fractionation approaches and distinguish between N2 fixation rates by planktonicdiazotrophs to those associated with aggregates of various sizes. We stress that future research should focus on developing complimentary visualization techniques such as NanoSIMS that may localize diazotrophs on aggregates while providing cell specificN2 fixation rates at the same time. These novel approaches will provide new insights on the different roles of aggregates in supporting heterotrophicN2 fixation. Moreover, insights gained by these visualization approaches may have a broader significance in future research of N2 fixation and the aquaticnitrogencycle, including environments in which diazotrophy has been traditionally overlooked.Direct Detection of HeterotrophicDiazotrophs Associated with Planktonic Aggregates
Authors: Søren Hallstrøm; Jean-Baptiste Raina; Martin Ostrowski; Donovan H Parks; Gene W Tyson; Philip Hugenholtz; Roman Stocker; Justin R Seymour; Lasse Riemann Journal: ISME J Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 11.217
Authors: Lasse Riemann; Eyal Rahav; Uta Passow; Hans-Peter Grossart; Dirk de Beer; Isabell Klawonn; Meri Eichner; Mar Benavides; Edo Bar-Zeev Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 6.064
Authors: Subhendu Chakraborty; Ken H Andersen; André W Visser; Keisuke Inomura; Michael J Follows; Lasse Riemann Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Juan José Pierella Karlusich; Eric Pelletier; Fabien Lombard; Madeline Carsique; Etienne Dvorak; Sébastien Colin; Marc Picheral; Francisco M Cornejo-Castillo; Silvia G Acinas; Rainer Pepperkok; Eric Karsenti; Colomban de Vargas; Patrick Wincker; Chris Bowler; Rachel A Foster Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 14.919