Literature DB >> 23220597

Can we improve the prediction of hip fracture by assessing bone structure using shape and appearance modelling?

S R Goodyear1, R J Barr, E McCloskey, S Alesci, R M Aspden, D M Reid, J S Gregory.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a continuing need to improve the prediction of hip fractures to identify those at highest risk, enabling cost-effective use of preventative therapies.
METHODS: The aim of this work was to validate an innovative imaging biomarker for hip fracture by modelling the shape and texture of the proximal femur assessed from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. Scans used were acquired at baseline from elderly patients participating in a prospective, placebo-controlled fracture prevention study of the bisphosphonate, clodronate. 182 subjects who subsequently suffered a hip fracture were age, weight and height matched with two controls who did not suffer a fracture during a median 4-year follow-up period. Logistic regression was used to test if variables were good predictors of fracture and adjust for bone mineral density (BMD).
RESULTS: Shape mode 2, reflecting variability in neck-shaft angle, neck width and the size of both trochanters (0.81 (OR), 0.68-0.97 (CI), 0.024 (P)), and appearance mode 6, recording grey-level contrast (1.33, 1.11-1.59, 0.002), were significant predictors of hip fracture and remained so after adjustment for BMD (shape mode 2 (0.77, 0.64-0.93, 0.006), appearance mode 6 (1.32, 1.10-1.59, 0.003)). Receiver Operating Curve analysis showed the combination of shape mode 2, appearance mode 6 and BMD was 3% better than any single predictor.
CONCLUSION: Variables derived from shape and appearance models gave a prediction of fracture comparable to BMD and in combination with BMD gave an improvement in the prediction of hip fracture that could predict an additional 2000 hip fracture cases per year in the UK, potentially saving more than £20 million per year and 10,000 cases in the US.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23220597     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.11.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  16 in total

Review 1.  The effects of weight loss approaches on bone mineral density in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  S Soltani; G R Hunter; A Kazemi; S Shab-Bidar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Hip Fracture Discrimination Based on Statistical Multi-parametric Modeling (SMPM).

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Aihong Yu; Ling Wang; Yongbin Su; Andrew J Burghardt; Thomas F Lang; Xiaoguang Cheng
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Are we taking full advantage of the growing number of pharmacological treatment options for osteoporosis?

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Stephen H Schlecht; Kenneth M Kozloff
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.547

Review 4.  Computational anatomy in the study of bone structure.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Daniel P Nicolella
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Fracture risk predictions based on statistical shape and density modeling of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Todd L Bredbenner; Robert L Mason; Lorena M Havill; Eric S Orwoll; Daniel P Nicolella
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Increasing shape modelling accuracy by adjusting for subject positioning: an application to the analysis of radiographic proximal femur symmetry using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  C Lindner; G A Wallis; T F Cootes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Associations between body mass index across adult life and hip shapes at age 60 to 64: Evidence from the 1946 British birth cohort.

Authors:  Stella G Muthuri; Fiona R Saunders; Rebecca J Hardy; Anastasia V Pavlova; Kathryn R Martin; Jennifer S Gregory; Rebecca J Barr; Judith E Adams; Diana Kuh; Richard M Aspden; Rachel Cooper
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Statistical shape and appearance models in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Isaac Castro-Mateos; Jose M Pozo; Timothy F Cootes; J Mark Wilkinson; Richard Eastell; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 9.  Osteoporosis - a current view of pharmacological prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Subhajit Das; Julie C Crockett
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  Statistical shape modelling of hip and lumbar spine morphology and their relationship in the MRC National Survey of Health and Development.

Authors:  Anastasia V Pavlova; Fiona R Saunders; Stella G Muthuri; Jennifer S Gregory; Rebecca J Barr; Kathryn R Martin; Rebecca J Hardy; Rachel Cooper; Judith E Adams; Diana Kuh; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.