Literature DB >> 34495483

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Conditions: Is Cell-Free DNA Testing the Next Step?

Deirdre Zander-Fox1,2,3,4, Tristan Hardy5,6, Alice Rogers7, Melody Menezes8,9, Stefan C Kane8,10,11.   

Abstract

Genetic assessment of an embryo via preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) represents an important reproductive option for couples wanting to try and improve success rates from in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles, as well as reduce their risk of having a child born with a genetic condition. Currently, biopsy of the developing embryo prior to transfer allows genetic assessment of an embryo for either chromosome copy number (aneuploidy [PGT-A] or segmental rearrangement [PGT-SR]) or to avoid the transmission of a single gene condition (monogenic conditions [PGT-M]). However, this technology is invasive and commands considerable resources. Non-invasive PGT (niPGT) offers a potential alternate mode of embryonic analysis. Whilst the utility of niPGT-A has been recently explored, there has been limited consideration of niPGT-M as an option for couples at risk of passing on a single gene or chromosomal condition. This review examines the historical and current clinical context of preimplantation embryonic analysis for monogenic conditions, in addition to important considerations surrounding the origin and analysis of cell-free deoxyribose nucleic acid (cfDNA), whether it is sourced via blastocentesis or spent embryonic culture medium (SCM). Future capabilities of this testing modality will almost certainly be enhanced by integration of whole genome sequencing into everyday practice. In addition, the increased utilisation of reproductive carrier screening as part of standard reproductive healthcare will likely result in the identification of a larger high-risk population. As a result, stratification of limited and highly specialised reproductive genetic resources will be required. Prospective parents should continue to be made aware of the limitations of this technology, with prenatal confirmatory testing remaining an essential part of antenatal care in these patients. However, niPGT-M poses an important alternate testing modality for high-risk couples, particularly in the setting of embryos that cannot be biopsied for traditional PGT-M and as demand for this treatment continues to grow.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34495483     DOI: 10.1007/s40291-021-00556-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1177-1062            Impact factor:   4.074


  56 in total

Review 1.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Elias M Dahdouh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Multiple genetic diagnoses from single cells using multiplex PCR: reliability and allele dropout.

Authors:  I Findlay; P Matthews; P Quirke
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent culture medium as a substitute for trophectoderm biopsy.

Authors:  Carmen Rubio; Catherine Racowsky; David H Barad; Richard T Scott; Carlos Simon
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for single gene disorders: A population-based study from 1977 to 2016.

Authors:  Alice Poulton; Sharon Lewis; Lisa Hui; Jane L Halliday
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Biopsy of human preimplantation embryos and sexing by DNA amplification.

Authors:  A H Handyside; J K Pattinson; R J Penketh; J D Delhanty; R M Winston; E G Tuddenham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-02-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT): the next revolution in reproductive genetics?

Authors:  Megan Leaver; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 7.  The role of prenatal diagnosis following preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene conditions: A historical overview of evolving technologies and clinical practice.

Authors:  Tristan Hardy
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Proof of concept: preimplantation genetic screening without embryo biopsy through analysis of cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture media.

Authors:  Mousa I Shamonki; Helen Jin; Zachary Haimowitz; Lian Liu
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Birth of a normal girl after in vitro fertilization and preimplantation diagnostic testing for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  A H Handyside; J G Lesko; J J Tarín; R M Winston; M R Hughes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-09-24       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification.

Authors:  A H Handyside; E H Kontogianni; K Hardy; R M Winston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-04-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.