Marilyn D Thomas1, Elizabeth K Michaels2, Alexis N Reeves2, Uche Okoye2, Melisa M Price2, Rebecca E Hasson3, David H Chae4, Amani M Allen2. 1. Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. Electronic address: marilyn.thomas@berkeley.edu. 2. Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. 3. Schools of Kinesiology and Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 4. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Human Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Black women have the highest estimated allostatic load (AL). AL and self-perceived health are strong health predictors and have been linked to racial discrimination. Research suggests that everyday and institution-specific racial discrimination may predict different AL and self-reported health (SRH) outcomes. Furthermore, discrepancies between AL and self-perceived health could widen disparities. We estimated associations between everyday versus institution-specific racial discrimination with AL and SRH. METHODS: Data are from a San Francisco Bay Area community sample of 208 black women aged 30-50 years. Participation involved a questionnaire, self-interview, blood draw, and anthropometric measurements. Adjusted generalized linear regression models estimated associations of racial discrimination with AL and SRH. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, socioeconomic position, and medication use, institution-specific discrimination was negatively associated with AL (i.e., better health), whereas everyday experiences showed no association. Those reporting very-high (vs. moderate) institution-specific discrimination had lower AL (β = -1.31 [95% CI: -2.41, -0.20]; AL range: 0-15). No racial discrimination-SRH association was found. CONCLUSIONS: For black women, (1) institution-specific racial discrimination may be differentially embodied compared with everyday experiences and (2) institutional racism may contribute to physiologic stress-regulation regardless of self-perceived health status. Potential factors that may contribute to an inverse racial discrimination-AL association, and future research, are discussed.
PURPOSE: Black women have the highest estimated allostatic load (AL). AL and self-perceived health are strong health predictors and have been linked to racial discrimination. Research suggests that everyday and institution-specific racial discrimination may predict different AL and self-reported health (SRH) outcomes. Furthermore, discrepancies between AL and self-perceived health could widen disparities. We estimated associations between everyday versus institution-specific racial discrimination with AL and SRH. METHODS: Data are from a San Francisco Bay Area community sample of 208 black women aged 30-50 years. Participation involved a questionnaire, self-interview, blood draw, and anthropometric measurements. Adjusted generalized linear regression models estimated associations of racial discrimination with AL and SRH. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, socioeconomic position, and medication use, institution-specific discrimination was negatively associated with AL (i.e., better health), whereas everyday experiences showed no association. Those reporting very-high (vs. moderate) institution-specific discrimination had lower AL (β = -1.31 [95% CI: -2.41, -0.20]; AL range: 0-15). No racial discrimination-SRH association was found. CONCLUSIONS: For black women, (1) institution-specific racial discrimination may be differentially embodied compared with everyday experiences and (2) institutional racism may contribute to physiologic stress-regulation regardless of self-perceived health status. Potential factors that may contribute to an inverse racial discrimination-AL association, and future research, are discussed.
Authors: David R Williams; Dolly A John; Daphna Oyserman; John Sonnega; Selina A Mohammed; James S Jackson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Elizabeth Brondolo; Leslie R M Hausmann; Juhee Jhalani; Melissa Pencille; Jennifer Atencio-Bacayon; Asha Kumar; Jasmin Kwok; Jahanara Ullah; Alan Roth; Daniel Chen; Robert Crupi; Joseph Schwartz Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2011-08
Authors: Dawn M Upchurch; Judith Stein; Gail A Greendale; Laura Chyu; Chi-Hong Tseng; Mei-Hua Huang; Tené T Lewis; Howard M Kravitz; Teresa Seeman Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Nancy Krieger; Pamela D Waterman; Anna Kosheleva; Jarvis T Chen; Kevin W Smith; Dana R Carney; Gary G Bennett; David R Williams; Gisele Thornhill; Elmer R Freeman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Amani M Allen; Yijie Wang; David H Chae; Melisa M Price; Wizdom Powell; Teneka C Steed; Angela Rose Black; Firdaus S Dhabhar; Leticia Marquez-Magaña; Cheryl L Woods-Giscombe Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Briana N Brownlow; Effua E Sosoo; Risa N Long; Lori S Hoggard; Tanisha I Burford; LaBarron K Hill Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Claire M Bird; E Kate Webb; Andrew T Schramm; Lucas Torres; Christine Larson; Terri A deRoon-Cassini Journal: J Trauma Stress Date: 2021-03-14
Authors: Eli K Michaels; Alexis N Reeves; Marilyn D Thomas; Melisa M Price; Rebecca E Hasson; David H Chae; Amani M Allen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 3.390