OBJECTIVES: Our goal in this study was to better understand racial and socioeconomic status (SES) variations in experiences of racial and nonracial discrimination. METHODS: We used 1999 and 2000 data from the YES Health Study, which involved a community sample of 50 Black and 50 White respondents drawn from 4 neighborhoods categorized according to racial group (majority Black or majority White) and SES (≤ 150% or > 250% of the poverty line). Qualitative and quantitative analyses examined experiences of discrimination across these neighborhoods. RESULTS: More than 90% of Blacks and Whites described the meaning of unfair treatment in terms of injustice and felt certain about the attribution of their experiences of discrimination. These experiences triggered similar emotional reactions (most frequently anger and frustration) and levels of stress across groups, and low-SES Blacks and Whites reported higher levels of discrimination than their moderate-SES counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Experiences of discrimination were commonplace and linked to similar emotional responses and levels of stress among both Blacks and Whites of low and moderate SES. Effects were the same whether experiences were attributed to race or to other reasons.
OBJECTIVES: Our goal in this study was to better understand racial and socioeconomic status (SES) variations in experiences of racial and nonracial discrimination. METHODS: We used 1999 and 2000 data from the YES Health Study, which involved a community sample of 50 Black and 50 White respondents drawn from 4 neighborhoods categorized according to racial group (majority Black or majority White) and SES (≤ 150% or > 250% of the poverty line). Qualitative and quantitative analyses examined experiences of discrimination across these neighborhoods. RESULTS: More than 90% of Blacks and Whites described the meaning of unfair treatment in terms of injustice and felt certain about the attribution of their experiences of discrimination. These experiences triggered similar emotional reactions (most frequently anger and frustration) and levels of stress across groups, and low-SES Blacks and Whites reported higher levels of discrimination than their moderate-SES counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Experiences of discrimination were commonplace and linked to similar emotional responses and levels of stress among both Blacks and Whites of low and moderate SES. Effects were the same whether experiences were attributed to race or to other reasons.
Authors: KaMala S Thomas; Richard A Nelesen; Vanessa L Malcarne; Michael G Ziegler; Joel E Dimsdale Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Sarah Mustillo; Nancy Krieger; Erica P Gunderson; Stephen Sidney; Heather McCreath; Catarina I Kiefe Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Thomas A LaVeist; Roland J Thorpe; Jessica E Galarraga; Kelly M Bower; Tiffany L Gary-Webb Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-08-15 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Marilyn D Thomas; Elizabeth K Michaels; Alexis N Reeves; Uche Okoye; Melisa M Price; Rebecca E Hasson; David H Chae; Amani M Allen Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Taneisha S Scheuermann; Jarron M Saint Onge; Megha Ramaswamy; Lisa Sanderson Cox; Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Nicole L Nollen Journal: Race Soc Probl Date: 2020-01-11
Authors: Daniel K Leibel; Danielle Shaked; Danielle L Beatty Moody; Hans B Liu; Nan-Ping Weng; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman; Shari R Waldstein Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: David H Chae; Amani M Nuru-Jeter; Nancy E Adler; Gene H Brody; Jue Lin; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Elissa S Epel Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Amani M Allen; Marilyn D Thomas; Eli K Michaels; Alexis N Reeves; Uche Okoye; Melisa M Price; Rebecca E Hasson; S Leonard Syme; David H Chae Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Marcella H Boynton; Ross E O'Hara; Jonathan Covault; Denise Scott; Howard Tennen Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.582