Dawn M Upchurch1, Judith Stein, Gail A Greendale, Laura Chyu, Chi-Hong Tseng, Mei-Hua Huang, Tené T Lewis, Howard M Kravitz, Teresa Seeman. 1. From the Department of Community Health Sciences (Upchurch), UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California; UCLA Department of Psychology (Stein), Los Angeles, California; Division of Geriatrics (Greendale, Huang, Seeman), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; Public Health Sciences Program (Chyu), Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California; Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research (Tseng), Department of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California; Department of Epidemiology (Lewis), Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; and Department of Psychiatry and Department of Preventive Medicine (Kravitz), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This research sought to assess racial and socioeconomic status (SES) differences in level and change in allostatic load (AL) over time in midlife women and to test whether psychosocial factors mediate these relationships. These factors were discrimination, perceived stress, and hostility. METHODS: Longitudinal data obtained from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation were used (n = 2063; mean age at baseline = 46.0 years). Latent growth curve models evaluated the impact of demographic, menopausal, and psychosocial variables on level and change in AL for 8 years. RESULTS: Direct effects: high levels of discrimination and hostility significantly predicted higher AL (path coefficients = 0.05 and 0.05, respectively). High perceived stress significantly predicted a faster rate of increase of AL (path coefficient = 0.06). Racial and SES differentials were present, with African American race (path coefficient = 0.23), low income (path coefficient = -0.15), and low education (path coefficient = -0.08) significantly predicting high AL level. Indirect effects: significant indirect effects were found for African American race, less income, and lower education through higher discrimination, perceived stress, and hostility on level and rate of AL. CONCLUSIONS: This was one of the first studies that investigated AL over multiple periods, and results supported AL as a cumulative phenomenon, affected by multiple psychosocial and demographic factors. The results suggest the complex ways in which race, SES, and psychosocial factors operate to influence AL.
OBJECTIVES: This research sought to assess racial and socioeconomic status (SES) differences in level and change in allostatic load (AL) over time in midlife women and to test whether psychosocial factors mediate these relationships. These factors were discrimination, perceived stress, and hostility. METHODS: Longitudinal data obtained from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation were used (n = 2063; mean age at baseline = 46.0 years). Latent growth curve models evaluated the impact of demographic, menopausal, and psychosocial variables on level and change in AL for 8 years. RESULTS: Direct effects: high levels of discrimination and hostility significantly predicted higher AL (path coefficients = 0.05 and 0.05, respectively). High perceived stress significantly predicted a faster rate of increase of AL (path coefficient = 0.06). Racial and SES differentials were present, with African American race (path coefficient = 0.23), low income (path coefficient = -0.15), and low education (path coefficient = -0.08) significantly predicting high AL level. Indirect effects: significant indirect effects were found for African American race, less income, and lower education through higher discrimination, perceived stress, and hostility on level and rate of AL. CONCLUSIONS: This was one of the first studies that investigated AL over multiple periods, and results supported AL as a cumulative phenomenon, affected by multiple psychosocial and demographic factors. The results suggest the complex ways in which race, SES, and psychosocial factors operate to influence AL.
Authors: Per E Gustafsson; Urban Janlert; Töres Theorell; Hugo Westerlund; Anne Hammarström Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Tené T Lewis; Susan A Everson-Rose; Lynda H Powell; Karen A Matthews; Charlotte Brown; Kelly Karavolos; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Elizabeth Jacobs; Deidre Wesley Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Marilyn D Thomas; Elizabeth K Michaels; Alexis N Reeves; Uche Okoye; Melisa M Price; Rebecca E Hasson; David H Chae; Amani M Allen Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Vickie M Mays; Robert-Paul Juster; Timothy J Williamson; Teresa E Seeman; Susan D Cochran Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2018 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: May A Beydoun; Angedith Poggi-Burke; Alan B Zonderman; Ola S Rostant; Michele K Evans; Deidra C Crews Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Jennifer R Dusendang; Alexis N Reeves; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; William H Herman; Kelly R Ylitalo; Siobán D Harlow Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2019-07-27 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Adolfo G Cuevas; Kaipeng Wang; David R Williams; Josiemer Mattei; Katherine L Tucker; Luis M Falcon Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Amani M Allen; Marilyn D Thomas; Eli K Michaels; Alexis N Reeves; Uche Okoye; Melisa M Price; Rebecca E Hasson; S Leonard Syme; David H Chae Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.905