Heather R Farmer1, Linda A Wray2, Steven A Haas3. 1. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. 3. Department of Sociology and Demography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To clarify the relationships among race, gender, and socioeconomic status (SES) with C-reactive protein (CRP). METHOD: The present study analyzed data from 6,521 Black and White respondents aged 51 and older in the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative sample of midlife and older adults, to address two aims. We sought to (i) assess the independent associations between race, gender, and SES with CRP concentrations and (ii) test whether race, gender, and SES interacted to produce unequal CRP concentrations cross-sectionally and over a 4-year follow-up. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that race, gender, and SES were each independently associated with baseline CRP, but only SES was associated with CRP at follow-up. Furthermore, race, gender, and education interacted to produce differential CRP levels at baseline. There were incremental benefits for each additional level of education for White men and women, but the relationship between education and CRP was more complicated for Black men and women. Compared with other race/gender groups with less than high school, Black women had the highest and Black men had the lowest levels of CRP. There were no apparent benefits to CRP for Black women with college compared with Black women with high school, while Black men with less than high school and college had similar concentrations of CRP. DISCUSSION: In clarifying the complexity inherent in CRP disparities, this work contributes to a greater understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying racial disparities in leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States.
OBJECTIVES: To clarify the relationships among race, gender, and socioeconomic status (SES) with C-reactive protein (CRP). METHOD: The present study analyzed data from 6,521 Black and White respondents aged 51 and older in the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative sample of midlife and older adults, to address two aims. We sought to (i) assess the independent associations between race, gender, and SES with CRP concentrations and (ii) test whether race, gender, and SES interacted to produce unequal CRP concentrations cross-sectionally and over a 4-year follow-up. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that race, gender, and SES were each independently associated with baseline CRP, but only SES was associated with CRP at follow-up. Furthermore, race, gender, and education interacted to produce differential CRP levels at baseline. There were incremental benefits for each additional level of education for White men and women, but the relationship between education and CRP was more complicated for Black men and women. Compared with other race/gender groups with less than high school, Black women had the highest and Black men had the lowest levels of CRP. There were no apparent benefits to CRP for Black women with college compared with Black women with high school, while Black men with less than high school and college had similar concentrations of CRP. DISCUSSION: In clarifying the complexity inherent in CRP disparities, this work contributes to a greater understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying racial disparities in leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States.
Authors: Ashley S Felix; Robert Shisler; Timiya S Nolan; Barbara J Warren; Jennifer Rhoades; Kierra S Barnett; Karen Patricia Williams Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Amani M Nuru-Jeter; Elizabeth K Michaels; Marilyn D Thomas; Alexis N Reeves; Roland J Thorpe; Thomas A LaVeist Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Howard D Sesso; Julie E Buring; Nader Rifai; Gavin J Blake; J Michael Gaziano; Paul M Ridker Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-12-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Amy D Thierry; Kyler Sherman-Wilkins; Marina Armendariz; Allison Sullivan; Heather R Farmer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-06 Impact factor: 3.390