| Literature DB >> 31234387 |
María Ángeles Toledano Medina1, Tania Merinas-Amo2, Zahira Fernández-Bedmar3, Rafael Font4, Mercedes Del Río-Celestino5, Jesús Pérez-Aparicio6, Alicia Moreno-Ortega7,8, Ángeles Alonso-Moraga9, Rafael Moreno-Rojas10.
Abstract
White and three types of black garlic (13, 32, and 45 days of aging, named 0C1, 1C2, and 2C1, respectively) were selected to study possible differences in their nutraceutic potential. For this purpose, garlic were physicochemically characterized (Brix, pH, aW, L, polyphenol, and antioxidant capacity), and both in vivo and in vitro assays were carried out. Black garlic samples showed higher polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity than the white ones. The biological assays showed that none of the samples (neither raw nor black garlic) produced toxic effects in the Drosophila melanogaster animal genetic model, nor exerted protective effects against H2O2, with the exception of the 0C1 black garlic. Moreover, only white garlic was genotoxic at the highest concentration. On the other hand, 0C1 black garlic was the most antigenotoxic substance. The in vivo longevity assays showed significant extension of lifespan at some concentrations of white and 0C1and 1C2 black garlic. The in vitro experiments showed that all of the garlic samples induced a decrease in leukemia cell growth. However, no type of garlic was able to induce proapoptotic internucleosomal DNA fragmentation. Taking into account the physicochemical and biological data, black garlic could be considered a potential functional food and used in the preventive treatment of age-related diseases. In addition, our findings could be relevant for black-garlic-processing agrifood companies, as the economical and timing costs can significantly be shortened from 45 to 13 days of aging.Entities:
Keywords: HL-60 cell line; black garlic; physicochemical profile; polyphenol content
Year: 2019 PMID: 31234387 PMCID: PMC6617303 DOI: 10.3390/foods8060220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Physicochemical characterization of four types of garlic according to the days of aging.
| Type of Garlic | White | 0C1 Black | 1C2 Black | 2C1 Black |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aging process (days) | 0 | 13 | 32 | 45 |
| Weight of 10 garlic cloves (g) | 49.69 ± 0.25 a,1 | 45.83 ± 0.32 b,c | 37.57 ± 0.38 b | 19.67 ± 0.19 d |
| Soluble solid content (ºBrix) | 40.47 ± 0.29 c | 40.47 ± 0.34 c | 43.17 ± 0.48 b | 45.67 ± 0.42 a |
| pH | 5.94 ± 0.01 a | 3.69 ± 0.03 b | 3.60 ± 0.04 c | 3.49 ± 0.06 d |
| Water activity ( | 0.97 ± 0 a | 0.93 ± 0 c | 0.93 ± 0 c | 0.93 ± 0 c |
| Browning intensity ( | 47.16 ± 0.15 a | 18.73 ± 0.21 c | 17.85 ± 0.24 b | 17.58 ± 0.25 b |
| Polyphenol content (g GAE/kg) | 4.30 ± 0.04 d | 10.94 ± 0.28 c | 14.67 ± 0.19 b | 16.17 ± 0.29 a |
| Antioxidant activity (TROLOX equivalents/kg) | 10.20 ± 0.27 d | 67.65 ± 1.26 b | 57.35 ± 1.74 c | 78.61 ± 2.41 a |
Values are means ± standard error (SE) (n = 3). 1 Different letters (a, b, c, d) in the same row show significant values in a one-way ANOVA using the post hoc Tukey’s test. GAE, gallic acid equivalents.
Figure 1Toxicity (A) and antitoxicity (B) levels of black and white garlic studied in D. melanogaster. (A) Percentage of viability of Drosophila treated with different concentrations of the assayed garlic. (B) Viability of Drosophila tested with different concentrations of the tested garlic combined with the genotoxicant hydrogen peroxide at 0.12 M. Values represent the mean ± SE from three independent experiments. *: significant (p ≤ 0.05), with respect to their concurrent controls. 0C1: black garlic with 13 days aging, 1C2: black garlic with 32 days aging, and 2C1: black garlic with 45 days aging.
Genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity of white (0 days aging), 0C1 black (13 days aging), 1C2 black (32 days aging), and 2C1 black (45 days aging) garlic in the Drosophila wing spot test.
| Compound | Clones per Wing (n° spots) 1 | Inhibition Percentage (%) 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Wings | Small Single Clones | Large Simple Clones | Twin Clones | Total Clones | ||
| H2O | 41 | 0.146 (6) | 0.049 (2) | 0 | 0.195 (8) | |
| H2O2 | 40 | 0.350 (14) | 0.075 (3) | 0 | 0.425 (17) + | |
|
| ||||||
| White garlic (mg/mL) | ||||||
| 0.25 | 40 | 0.225 (9) | 0.025 (1) | 0.025 (1) | 0.275 (11) − | |
| 2 | 40 | 0.375 (15) | 0.050 (2) | 0.000 | 0.425 (17) + | |
| 0C1 Black garlic (mg/mL) | ||||||
| 0.25 | 40 | 0.175 (7) | 0.025 (1) | 0.000 | 0.200 (8) − | |
| 2 | 41 | 0.122 (5) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.122 (5) − | |
| 1C2 Black garlic (mg/mL) | ||||||
| 0.25 | 40 | 0.200 (8) | 0.025 (1) | 0.025 (1) | 0.250 (10) - | |
| 2 | 40 | 0.175 (7) | 0.025 (1) | 0.000 | 0.200 (8) - | |
| 2C1 Black garlic (mg/mL) | ||||||
| 0.25 | 40 | 0.175 (7) | 0.05 (2) | 0.000 | 0.225 (9) − | |
| 2 | 40 | 0.250 (10) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.250 (10) − | |
|
| ||||||
| White garlic (mg/mL) | ||||||
| 0.25 | 34 | 0.235 (8) | 0.088 (3) | 0.000 | 0.323 (11) − | 24 |
| 2 | 34 | 0.265 (10) | 0.206 (7) | 0.000 | 0.500 (17) + | −17 |
| 0C1 Black garlic (mg/mL) | ||||||
| 0.25 | 30 | 0.5 (15) | 0.033 (1) | 0.000 | 0.533 (16) + | −25.4 |
| 2 | 30 | 0.233 (7) | 0.033 (1) | 0.000 | 0.266 (8) − | 37.4 |
| 1C2 Black garlic (mg/mL) | ||||||
| 0.25 | 26 | 0.307 (8) | 0.038 (1) | 0.000 | 0.346 (9) − | 18.6 |
| 2 | 38 | 0.368 (14) | 0.053 (2) | 0.000 | 0.421 (16) − | 0.17 |
| 2C1 Black garlic (mg/mL) | ||||||
| 0.25 | 28 | 0.357 (10) | 0.036 (1) | 0.000 | 0.393 (11) − | 7.5 |
| 2 | 28 | 0.357 (10) | 0.250 (7) | 0.000 | 0.607 (17) + | −42.8 |
1 Statistical diagnosis according to Frei and Wurgler [29,30]. +, positive (p < 0.05); −, negative. m, multiplication factor. Levels of significance α = β = 0.05, tail test without Bonferroni correction. Inconclusive results were resolved by Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon U-test. 2 The inhibition percentages for the combined treatments were calculated from total spots per wing according to Abraham [31].
Figure 2Survival curves of D. melanogaster fed with different concentrations of garlic (black and white) over time. A) White garlic, B) 0C1: black garlic with 13 days aging, C) 1C2: black garlic with 32 days aging and D) 2C1: black garlic with 45 days aging.
Mean and significances of lifespan and healthspan curves for the different garlic treatments assayed in D. melanogaster.
| Compound Title | Treatment (mg/mL) | Mean Lifespan (Days) | Mean Healthspan (Days) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative Control | 0 | 60.31 | 32.46 | ||
| WG | 0.25 | 70.47 | * | 38.40 | ns |
| 0.5 | 68.72 | ns | 29.40 | ns | |
| 1 | 71.43 | ** | 40.39 | * | |
| 2 | 78.89 | *** | 40.44 | * | |
| 4 | 58.21 | ns | 31.91 | ns | |
| 0C1 | 0.25 | 70.15 | * | 37.67 | ns |
| 0.5 | 71.72 | ** | 38.18 | ns | |
| 1 | 70.73 | * | 30.85 | ns | |
| 2 | 71.80 | * | 43.90 | * | |
| 4 | 62.60 | ns | 33.10 | ns | |
| 1C2 | 0.25 | 69.73 | * | 29.36 | ns |
| 0.5 | 65.19 | ns | 25.15 | * | |
| 1 | 70.49 | ** | 31.10 | ns | |
| 2 | 70.18 | * | 28.57 | ns | |
| 4 | 60.26 | ns | 26.20 | ns | |
| 2C1 | 0.25 | 59.06 | ns | 24.07 | ns |
| 0.5 | 64.75 | ns | 41.29 | ns | |
| 1 | 59.82 | ns | 28.50 | ns | |
| 2 | 57.30 | ns | 23.46 | ** | |
| 4 | 66.38 | ns | 40.50 | ns | |
Results were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and the significance of the curves was determined by the Log-Rank method (Mantel–Cox). ns: non-significant (p > 0.05), *: significant (p < 0.05), **: significant (p < 0.01), ***: significant (p < 0.001). WG: white garlic (0 days aging); 0C1: black garlic (13 days aging); 1C2: black garlic (32 days aging); 2C1: black garlic (45 days aging).
Figure 3Viability of HL-60 cells treated with different concentrations of black and white garlic for 72 h. (A) White garlic, (B) 0C1: black garlic with 13 days aging, (C) 1C2: black garlic with 32 days aging, and (D) 2C1: black garlic with 45 days aging.
Figure 4Internucleosomal DNA fragmentation in HL-60 cells treated for 5 h with different concentrations of black and white garlic. DNA fragmentation was detected following electrophoresis in agarose gels and staining with ethidium bromide. M: indicates DNA size marker; C: indicates control (lane 1); 0.25 mg/mL (lane 2); 0.50 mg/mL (lane 3); 1 mg/mL (lane 4); 2 mg/mL (lane 5), and 4 mg/mL (lane 6) of garlic sample. (A) White garlic, (B) 0C1: black garlic with 13 days aging, (C) 1C2: black garlic with 32 days aging, and (D) 2C1: black garlic with 45 days aging.