| Literature DB >> 28587168 |
Ji Hyeon Ryu1,2, Dawon Kang3,4.
Abstract
Garlic (Allium sativum) has been used as a medicinal food since ancient times. However, some people are reluctant to ingest raw garlic due to its unpleasant odor and taste. Therefore, many types of garlic preparations have been developed to reduce these attributes without losing biological functions. Aged black garlic (ABG) is a garlic preparation with a sweet and sour taste and no strong odor. It has recently been introduced to Asian markets as a functional food. Extensive in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that ABG has a variety of biological functions such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-obesity, anti-diabetic, anti-allergic, cardioprotective, and hepatoprotective effects. Recent studies have compared the biological activity and function of ABG to those of raw garlic. ABG shows lower anti-inflammatory, anti-coagulation, immunomodulatory, and anti-allergic effects compared to raw garlic. This paper reviews the physicochemical properties, biological activity, health benefits, adverse effects, and general limitations of ABG.Entities:
Keywords: aged black garlic; allicin; antioxidants; black garlic; pyruvate; sugar
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28587168 PMCID: PMC6152780 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22060919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1An example representing aging processes for aged black garlic (ABG) production. This protocol is from a patent (No. 10-2012-0058110). For ABG preparation, fresh raw garlic (FRG) was incubated for 48–60 h at 80–90 °C followed by 48–60 h at 70–80 °C, then 72–120 h at 60–70 °C, and finally 72–120 h at 55–65 °C.
Comparison of contents of physicochemical components between aged black garlic (ABG) and fresh raw garlic (FRG).
| Components | Content in ABG | Content in FRG | Change in ABG Compared to FRG | Analytical Methods | References | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture (%) | 58.2 ± 0.4 | 66.6 ± 1.3 | ↓ | AOAC 925.10 | [ | |
| 45.3 | 66.1 | ↓ | [ | |||
| 29.9 ± 0.5 | 64.2 ± 1.5 | ↓ | [ | |||
| 43.1 ± 0.4 | 62.3 ± 0.6 | ↓ | AOAC 991.02 | [ | ||
| 45.1 | 60.3 | ↓ | - | [ | ||
| Protein (%) | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.7 | ↑ | AOAC 984.13 | [ | |
| 9.1 | 8.4 | ↑ | - | [ | ||
| Lipid (%) | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.2 | ↑ | AOAC 920.39 | [ | |
| 0.3 | 0.1 | ↑ | - | [ | ||
| Carbohydrate (%) | 47 | 28.7 | ↑ | - | [ | |
| Ash (%) | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.6 | - | AOAC 942.05 | [ | |
| 0.11 | 0.07 | ↑ | [ | |||
| 2.1 | - | ↑ | - | [ | no detection in FRG | |
| Total sugar (%) | 6.2 | 4.5 ± 0.1 | ↑ | colorimetric method using PSA | [ | |
| 49.2 ± 0.2 | 14.6 ± 1.3 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Reducing sugar (%) | 1.6 | 0.2 | ↑ | colorimetric method using DNS | [ | |
| 28.2 ± 1.2 | 4.2 ± 0.1 | ↑ | [ | |||
| pH | 4.4 ± 0.1 | 6.8 | ↓ | by pH meter | [ | |
| 3.7 ± 0.1 | 6.3 ± 0.1 | ↓ | [ | |||
| 3.1 | 6.4 | ↓ | [ | |||
| 4.2 ± 0.1 | 6.3 ± 0.1 | ↓ | [ | |||
| Color Brightness | 22.5 ± 0.2 | 78.8 ± 0.1 | ↓ | Spectrocolori-meter color comparison | [ | |
| 4.3 ± 2 | 68.4 ± 1.7 | ↓ | [ | |||
| Redness | 2.9 ± 0.7 | -3.2 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 2.7 ± 1.0 | −3.8 ± 0.5 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Yellowness | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 21.6 ± 1.4 | ↓ | [ | ||
| −3.9 ± 1.5 | 26.6 ± 1.8 | ↓ | [ | |||
| Energy (kcal/100 g) | 227.1 | 138 | ↑ | - | [ |
Brightness ranges from black (0) to white (100). Redness ranges from −60 (green) to 60 (red). Yellowness ranges from −60 (blue) to 60 (yellow). The up-arrow symbol (↑) and down arrow symbol (↓) represent an increase and a decrease in physicochemical components during the aging processes, respectively. AOAC represents Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Comparison between ABG and FRG was performed within a single study.
Comparison of contents of phytochemical components between ABG and FRG.
| Components | Content in ABG | Content in FRG | Change in ABG Compared to FRG | Analytical Methods | Basis for Comparison | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allicin (mg/100 g) | - | 362 ± 1 | ↓ | colorimetric method | allicin | [ |
| 20 | 345 | ↓ | HPLC | [ | ||
| Flavonoid (mg/100 g) | 0.8 | 0.1 | ↑ | colorimetric method | quercetin | [ |
| 1570 ± 211 | 322 ± 7 | ↑ | rutin | [ | ||
| 195 ± 8 | 125 ± 13 | ↑ | rutin | [ | ||
| Pyruvate (mmol/100 g) | 27.8 ± 0.3 | 18.8 ± 0.3 | ↑ | Colorimetric method | [ | |
| 245.7 ± 2.4 | 48.7 ± 1.2 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Thiosulfate (mmol/100 g) | 9.12 ± 0.05 | 0.65 ± 0.03 | ↑ | colorimetric method | [ | |
| 0.3 | 10.5 ± 0.4 | ↓ | [ | |||
| 0.8 | 0.1 | ↑ | OD value | [ | ||
| Total phenol (mg/100 g) | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | ↑ | Colorimetric method | caffeic acid | [ |
| 4835 ± 114 | 1391 ± 162 | ↑ | garlic acid | [ | ||
| 1000 ± 100 | 367 ± 22 | ↑ | garlic acid | [ | ||
| 22.3 ± 0.8 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | ↑ | garlic acid | [ | ||
| 1023 ± 19 | 255 ± 12 | ↑ | tannic acid | [ | ||
| SAC (mg/100 g) | 8.5 ± 0.1 | 2 | ↑ | HPLC-FLD | [ | |
| 19.4 | 2.4 | ↑ | HPLC | [ | ||
| 9.8 ± 0.2 | 2.2 | ↑ | HPLC-FLD | [ | ||
| 11.4 ± 0.9 | 2.3 | ↑ | HPLC | [ |
The up-arrow symbol (↑) and down arrow symbol (↓) represent an increase and a decrease in phytochemical components during the aging processes, respectively. FLD represents fluorescence detection. Comparison between ABG and FRG was performed within a single study.
Comparison of contents of free sugars and minerals between ABG and FRG.
| Components | Content in ABG | Content in FRG | Change in ABG Compared to FRG | References | Remarks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free sugars (mg/100 g) | Arabinose | 1.6 ± 0.3 | - | ↑ | [ | no detection in FRG |
| 114.5 ± 15.6 | 51.1 ± 6 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Galactose | 13.1 ± 1.7 | - | ↑ | [ | no detection in FRG | |
| Glucose | 181.7 ± 8.8 | 91.6 ± 2.7 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 210 ± 5 | - | ↑ | [ | no detection in FRG | ||
| 221.9 ± 11.5 | 16.7 ± 0.7 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Fructose | 2043.7 ± 5 | 63.9 ± 3.4 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 4002 ± 71 | 707 ± 8 | ↑ | [ | |||
| 3383.2 ± 44.0 | 31.4 ± 1.0 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Sucrose | 119.1 ± 3.5 | 76.3 ± 0.1 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 242.9 ± 18.1 | 181.7 ± 1.6 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Maltose | 7.8 ± 0.4 | 1.7 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 48.2 ± 4.4 | 11.7 ± 0.8 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Minerals (mg/100 g) | Al | 25.4 ± 0.8 | 0.5 | ↑ | [ | |
| Ca | 13.1 ± 0.4 | 7.5 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 15.2 ± 0.4 | 12.2 ± 0.3 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Cu | 2 ± 0.1 | 1.7 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 0.27 | 0.32 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Fe | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 2.3 ± 0.5 | 1.6 | ↑ | [ | |||
| K | 738.2 ± 11.2 | 434.9 ± 4.2 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 1018.4 ± 23.2 | 907.4 ± 20.6 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Mg | 27.2 ± 0.8 | 15.7 ± 0.1 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 48.7 ± 1.1 | 43.2 ± 1.0 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Mn | 0.7 | 0.5 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 0.5 | 0.4 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Na | 13.0 ± 0.1 | 9.1 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 35.5 ± 0.8 | 22.0 ± 0.5 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Zn | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.5 | - | [ | ||
| 1.3 | 1.2 | ↑ | [ | |||
| P | 143.7 ± 5.5 | 93.3 ± 0.3 | ↑ | [ | ||
| 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | ↑ | [ | |||
| Se | 0.13 | 0.05 | ↑ | [ | ||
| S | 189.7 ± 4.3 | 183.1 ± 4.2 | - | [ | ||
The up-arrow (↑), down arrow (↓), and dash (-) represent an increase, a decrease, and no change in free sugars and minerals during the aging processes, respectively. Comparison between ABG and FRG was performed within a single study.
Figure 2The colors of FRG and ABG cloves. The pure white/light yellow color of FRG (A) was changed to black (B) by heat treatment. The heating procedure was performed in a temperature and humidity controlled room for over 10 days (see Figure 1).
Comparison of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities between ABG and FRG.
| Biological Activities | Measurement | Content in ABG | Content in FRG | Change in ABG Compared to FRG | Basis for Comparison | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antioxidant activity | DPPH radical scavenging activity | 0.1 mg/mL | 0.4 mg/mL | ↑ | IC50 | [ |
| 4.1 mg/mL | 114.9 mg/mL | ↑ | IC50 (Japanese garlic) | [ | ||
| 7.3 mg/mL | 88.5 mg/mL | ↑ | IC50 (Chinese garlic) | [ | ||
| 97% | 10.4% | ↑ | 900 μg/mL | [ | ||
| 67.4 ± 0.2% | 35.7 ± 0.6% | ↑ | 1 mg/mL | [ | ||
| 1.3 mg/mL | 0.7 mg/mL | ↓ | IC50 | [ | ||
| 82.5 ± 0.5% | 35.1 ± 0.7% | ↑ | 2 mg/mL | [ | ||
| ABTS radical scavenging activity | 0.2 mg/mL | 0.3 mg/mL | ↑ | IC50 | [ | |
| 1 mg/mL | 1.1 mg/mL | ↑ | IC50 | [ | ||
| Hydroxy radical scavenging activity | 75 ± 0.7% | 60.7 ± 0.2% | ↑ | 2 mg/mL | [ | |
| Nitrite radical scavenging activity | 32.9% | 55.2% | ↓ | 5 mg/mL | [ | |
| 0.1 mg/mL | 0.2 mg/mL | ↑ | IC50 | [ | ||
| Fe2+-chelating activity | 18.2 ± 0.7% | 30.6 ± 1.4% | ↓ | 2 mg/mL | [ | |
| Reducing power | 2.6 | 0.4 | ↑ | OD | [ | |
| SOD activity | 64.4% | 16.8% | ↑ | 100 mg/mL | [ | |
| Anti-inflammatory activity | Inhibition of COX-2 activity | 39.1 ± 3.8% | 80.5 ± 7.8% | ↓ | 250 μg/mL | [ |
| Inhibition of 5-LO activity | 29.5 ± 2.1% | 97.4 ± 9.5% | ↓ | 250 μg/mL | [ |
DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS: 2,2-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate); IC50: the concentration of a sample that gives half inhibition. The up-arrow symbol (↑) and down arrow symbol (↓) represent an increase and a decrease in antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities during the aging processes, respectively. Comparison between ABG and FRG was performed within a single study.