| Literature DB >> 31221621 |
Mattias Backman1, Florian Flenkenthaler2, Andreas Blutke3, Maik Dahlhoff4, Erik Ländström1, Simone Renner5, Julia Philippou-Massier2, Stefan Krebs6, Birgit Rathkolb7, Cornelia Prehn8, Michal Grzybek9, Ünal Coskun9, Michael Rothe10, Jerzy Adamski11, Martin Hrabĕ de Angelis12, Rüdiger Wanke13, Thomas Fröhlich6, Georg J Arnold6, Helmut Blum6, Eckhard Wolf14.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The liver regulates the availability of insulin to other tissues and is the first line insulin response organ physiologically exposed to higher insulin concentrations than the periphery. Basal insulin during fasting inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis, whereas postprandial insulin peaks stimulate glycogen synthesis. The molecular consequences of chronic insulin deficiency for the liver have not been studied systematically.Entities:
Keywords: Insulin deficiency; Lipidome; Liver; Metabolome; Proteome; Transcriptome
Year: 2019 PMID: 31221621 PMCID: PMC6667734 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.05.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Metab ISSN: 2212-8778 Impact factor: 7.422
Figure 1Outline of the multi-omics study of consequences of insulin-deficient diabetes for the liver. MIDY pigs (n = 4) and WT littermate controls (n = 5) were maintained for two years under standardized conditions. MIDY pigs had significantly (p < 0.001) elevated fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels (310 ± 39 mg/dL vs. 120 ± 26 mg/dL in WT) and plasma beta hydroxybutyrate (BHB) concentrations (48 ± 20 μmol/L vs. 11 ± 6 μmol/L in WT). C-peptide was undetectable in plasma from MIDY pigs. A complex biobank was established, including liver samples taken by systematic random sampling [9].
Figure 2Transcriptome differences between liver tissue samples from MIDY and WT pigs. A: Plot showing the log fold change between MIDY/WT and the mean count abundance per gene. The red and blue colored dots indicate transcripts with significantly increased or decreased abundance (FDR < 0.05). B: Heat map showing the 20 transcripts with the most significant (FDR < 0.05) increase and the 20 transcripts with the most marked decrease in abundance in MIDY vs. WT pigs. Red indicates higher expression in MIDY compared to WT and blue the reverse. Genes with the “LOC” name could not be matched to a recognized gene name. C: A network showing the ClueGO functional enrichment analysis for differentially abundant transcripts (red squares: increased in MIDY; blue diamonds: decreased in MIDY). The circles represent enriched KEGG pathways. The size of the circles indicates the significance of enrichment, the color code from red to blue indicates the proportion of transcripts with increased (red) and decreased (blue) abundance in MIDY pigs.
Figure 3Quantitative proteome analysis of liver tissue from MIDY and WT pigs. A: Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of normalized LFQ intensity values. Liver proteomes of MIDY animals are separated from WT replicates. The color code indicates z-score normalized expression values. B: Principal component analysis (PCA) clearly separates proteomes from MIDY and WT pigs. Spots represent individual animals. C: Volcano plot of log2 fold changes (MIDY/WT). Red and blue dots indicate differentially abundant proteins. Black curves represent the permutation-based FDR significance cutoff. Prominent differentially abundant proteins are highlighted. D and E: Proteomaps illustrating functional changes in the MIDY pig liver proteome. Treemaps for proteins significantly increased (D), and decreased (E), in abundance in MIDY compared to WT pigs (FDR < 0.05) are shown. Functionally related proteins are annotated based on KEGG orthology. Related functional categories are arranged in adjoining locations and share similar colors. Polygon areas represent the mass fraction of the corresponding proteins, i.e. protein abundances weighted by protein size.
Figure 4Correlation between proteomics and transcriptomics data in MIDY vs. WT liver tissue. A: Scatter plot of protein abundance ratios against corresponding mRNA ratios. Proteins with significant abundance alterations (FDR < 0.05) but no significant change in the corresponding transcript level are marked in blue. Significant regulation (FDR < 0.05) only in the transcriptome but not in the proteome is indicated in red. Common regulation at both levels is depicted in purple. Selected hits are highlighted. R: Pearson R. B: 2D annotation enrichment analysis between proteome and transcriptome data. Abundance ratios between MIDY and WT pigs were rescaled and depicted as transcriptome and proteome score. Significant pathways and gene ontology categories with p < 0.01 are shown. Terms located close to the ascending diagonal indicate common regulation at the transcriptome and proteome level. Annotation categories are color coded. Selected functional groups are highlighted.
Figure 5Western blot analysis of insulin receptor activation and downstream signaling molecules. Densitometric data were square root transformed to approximate normal distribution and evaluated using Student's t-tests. The bar diagrams show means and standard deviations. Significant differences between MIDY and WT pigs are indicated by asterisks: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; °borderline significance (p < 0.07).
Figure 6Relative metabolite abundance changes between MIDY and WT liver tissue. The graphs show the relative abundances of amino acids (A), biogenic amines (B), and selected metabolic indicators (C), determined by targeted metabolomics. Graph (D) shows the relative abundance of lipid groups determined by lipidomics. The dashed line indicates the mean abundance of the WT samples, bars show the mean relative abundance in MIDY samples. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). Abbreviations: Ac-Orn, N-acetylornithine; ADMA, asymmetric dimethylarginine; AAA, aromatic amino acid; Met-SO, methionine sulfoxide; PEA, phenethylamine; t4-OH-Pro, hydroxyproline; DMA, dimethylarginine; H1, hexose; AC, acyl carnitine; C(n), acyl carnitine chain length; DC, dicarboxylated, OH, hydroxylated; PC, glycerophosphocholines; SFA, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, mono-unsaturated FA; PUFA, polyunsaturated FA; SM, sphingomyelins; CE, cholesteryl ester; CL, cardiolipin; Cer, ceramide; Chol, cholesterol; DAG, diacylglycerol; HexCer, hexosylceramide; LP(C,E,S), lysophosphatidyl (choline, ethanolamine, serine); PA, phosphatidate; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; O-, ether linked; P(C,E,G,I,S), phosphatidyl (choline, ethanolamine, glycerol, inositol, serine); TAG, triacylglycerol.
Figure 7Activity of RDH16 in the retinoid metabolism in MIDY liver. A: Schematic representation of the two-step reaction of retinol to retinoic acid. The first and rate-limiting step is catalyzed by retinol dehydrogenases. B: Increased abundance of retinol dehydrogenase 16 (RDH16) in MIDY compared to WT pigs. C: Quantification of retinol, retinal, and retinoic acid in extracts from MIDY and WT liver tissue. Concentrations are given in ng per g tissue. Differences were tested for statistical significance using Student's t-test.