| Literature DB >> 29678421 |
Arne Hinrichs1, Barbara Kessler1, Mayuko Kurome2, Andreas Blutke3, Elisabeth Kemter1, Maren Bernau4, Armin M Scholz4, Birgit Rathkolb5, Simone Renner6, Sebastian Bultmann7, Heinrich Leonhardt7, Martin Hrabĕ de Angelis8, Hiroshi Nagashima9, Andreas Hoeflich10, Werner F Blum11, Martin Bidlingmaier12, Rüdiger Wanke3, Maik Dahlhoff1, Eckhard Wolf13.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Laron syndrome (LS) is a rare, autosomal recessive disorder in humans caused by loss-of-function mutations of the growth hormone receptor (GHR) gene. To establish a large animal model for LS, pigs with GHR knockout (KO) mutations were generated and characterized.Entities:
Keywords: Dwarfism; Growth hormone receptor; Hypoglycemia; Insulin-like growth factor 1; Laron syndrome; Pig model; Signaling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29678421 PMCID: PMC6001387 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.03.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Metab ISSN: 2212-8778 Impact factor: 7.422
Figure 1Generation of a GHR-deficient pig model using CRISPR/Cas technology. (A) Partial DNA sequence of GHR exon 3. The sgRNA binding site is indicated in blue and the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) in green. Insertions (red) of 1 bp (founder #2529) or 7 bp (founder #2533) lead to a shift of the reading frame. WT = wild type. (B) Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis to detect the WT GHR sequence as well as monoallelic (Het) and biallelic (KO) mutations. (C) Partial amino acid sequences encoded by the WT and mutant GHR alleles. The signal peptide is shown in gray, WT GHR aa sequence in black (aa encoded by adjacent non-symmetrical exons in blue), missense aa sequence in red, and the premature termination codon as an asterisk. (D) Ligand immunohistochemistry demonstrating the absence of functional GHR (brown staining in control) in GHR-KO pigs. Chromogen: DAB; counterstain: Mayer's hemalum; bar = 10 μm.
Figure 2Serum IGF1, IGFBP and GH concentrations of GHR-KO compared with control pigs. (A) Scatter plot of serum IGF1 levels of GHR-KO and control pigs over time. (B) Means and standard deviations of all serum IGF1 values displayed in panel A (GHR-KO: n = 42; control: n = 69). (C) Representative IGFBP ligand blot. Right lane displays recombinant human IGFBP3 (41/38 kDa), IGFBP2 (32 kDa), IGFBP5 (29 kDa) and IGFBP4 (24 kDa). (D) Quantification of IGFBP3 and IGFBP2 in serum from GHR-KO (n = 10) and control pigs (n = 12). The figure shows medians, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and extremes (whiskers). (E) Representative GH secretion profiles of two female GHR-KO and two female control pigs. (F) Area under the GH curve (AUC; means and standard deviations for 6 female GHR-KO and 5 female/1 male control pigs). AU = arbitrary units. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3Body weight gain and growth of GHR-KO compared with control pigs. (A) GHR-KO pig (front) and control littermate aged 6 months. (B) Body weight gain. (C) Body length. (D) Relative body length (body length divided by the cube root of body weight). These parameters were determined in 12 GHR-KO and 25 control pigs. Panels A–D show least squares means (LSMs) and standard errors of LSMs estimated for group*age (see 2.8 for the statistical model). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns = not significant.
Figure 4Body composition of 6-month-old GHR-KO compared with control pigs. (A) DXA analysis revealed a significantly higher amount of total body fat in GHR-KO pigs. (B) The calculated ratio of muscle to fat tissue from MRI images at the last rib revealed a significant shift towards fat tissue in GHR-KO pigs (GHR-KO: n = 12; control: n = 25; ***p < 0.001). Panels A and B show least squares means (LSMs) and standard errors of LSMs estimated for the 2 groups (see 2.8 for the statistical model). (C) Representative magnetic resonance images used to evaluate the volume of the longissimus dorsi muscle (mu) and its overlying back fat (ft) at the last rib in GHR-KO and control pigs. Note the larger subcutaneous and visceral fat depots in GHR-KO pigs. (D) Representative macroscopic cross-sections of the first lumbar vertebra, the two longissimus dorsi muscles and the overlying back fat and skin. (E) Higher magnification of D showing an increased ratio of subcutaneous fat (ft) to skin (sk) thickness in a GHR-KO compared with a control pig. Histological section (H&E stain) showing an increased amount of intramuscular fat in GHR-KO pigs (bar = 100 μm).
Figure 5Disproportionate organ growth in GHR-KO compared with control pigs. GHR-deficiency led to a proportionate and disproportionate reduction in organ sizes. (A) Representative organs from control (left) and GHR-KO pigs (right). (B) Relative differences between GHR-KO and control pigs in absolute organ weights and in organ weight-to-body weight ratios (relative organ weights). These parameters were determined in 9 GHR-KO and 25 control pigs, and least squares means (LSMs) and standard errors of LSMs were estimated for the 2 groups (see 2.8 for the statistical model). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 6Age-dependent changes in glucose and lipid homeostasis parameters in GHR-KO and control pigs. (A) Transient juvenile hypoglycemia in GHR-KO pigs. (B) Unchanged serum insulin concentrations. (C) Initially lower, then higher HOMA-IR score (interaction group*age: p < 0.05). Serum concentrations of (D) triglycerides, (E) cholesterol, (F) low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, and (G) high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels were significantly lower in young GHR-KO pigs than in age-matched controls, but normalized with age. HDL-cholesterol levels of 23- to 27-week-old GHR-KO pigs were even higher than in their control littermates. At least 6 animals per group and age-class were investigated. Panels A–G show least squares means (LSMs) and standard errors of LSMs estimated for group*age (see 2.8 for the statistical model). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 7Western blot analysis of signaling cascades in liver samples of 6-month-old fasted GHR-KO (n = 5) and control pigs (n = 4). (A) Insulin receptor-related signaling pathway and PPARG. (B) GHR- and mTOR-related signaling pathways. The box plots show medians, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and extremes (whiskers). *p < 0.05; °p = 0.0635; evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Figure 8(A) Schematic summary of the changes in phosphorylation in INSR- and GHR-related signaling molecules in liver samples of GHR-KO compared with control pigs. *p < 0.05; °p = 0.0635; evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U test. (B) Significantly increased fasting serum leptin concentrations in 6-month-old GHR-KO vs. control pigs. The figure shows the estimated least squares means (LSMs) and standard errors of the LSMs for the two groups, taking into account the effect of sex (9 male/13 female control pigs; 6 male/6 female GHR-KO pigs). **p < 0.01 for the effect of group (PROC GLM). (C) Significantly increased expression and phosphorylation of LEPR in liver samples from GHR-KO compared with control pigs. PC = protein lysate from choroid plexus of a wild-type pig used as positive control. *p < 0.05; evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U test.