Laura Dubreuil-Vall1, Peggy Chau2, Giulio Ruffini3, Alik S Widge2, Joan A Camprodon2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Laboratory for Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation, 149 13th st. 2nd floor, Boston, MA, 02129, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology, Universitat de Barcelona, Casanova 143, 08036, Barcelona, Spain; Neuroelectrics Corporation, 210 Broadway, Suite 201, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. Electronic address: ldubreuilvall@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Laboratory for Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation, 149 13th st. 2nd floor, Boston, MA, 02129, USA. 3. Neuroelectrics Corporation, 210 Broadway, Suite 201, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to study anatomical and physiological dynamics and circuits supporting cognition and executive functions in particular has dramatically increased in recent years. However, its mechanisms of action remain only partially understood. OBJECTIVE: In this study we assess the cognitive and physiological effects of anodal tDCS to the DLPFC on executive function in order to understand (1) the role of DLPFC laterality, (2) the physiological dynamics sustaining the modulation of executive function by tDCS, and (3) the impact of state-dependent dynamics. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, we applied anodal tDCS targeting the left vs. right DLPFC vs. sham in 20 healthy individuals (10 males, 10 females). Immediately before and after tDCS, subjects performed the Flanker Task while we measured behavioral (reaction time and accuracy) and neurophysiological (ERP) responses. Specifically, the amplitude of N200, P300, ERN and Pe is compared before and after stimulation. RESULTS:Anodal tDCS to the left DLPFC lead to a significant improvement in reaction time, an increase in P300 amplitude and a decrease in N200 amplitude in a state-dependent manner: baseline ERP amplitudes conditioned the effects of tDCS. CONCLUSION: Given the role of these ERPs in conflict-related tasks, we speculate that tDCS is modulating the subconstructs of selective attention, conflict monitoring and response inhibition. These findings contribute to a further understanding of the role of left DLPFC in the modulation of executive function, and shed light into the mechanisms of action and the state dependent nature of tDCS.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The use of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to study anatomical and physiological dynamics and circuits supporting cognition and executive functions in particular has dramatically increased in recent years. However, its mechanisms of action remain only partially understood. OBJECTIVE: In this study we assess the cognitive and physiological effects of anodal tDCS to the DLPFC on executive function in order to understand (1) the role of DLPFC laterality, (2) the physiological dynamics sustaining the modulation of executive function by tDCS, and (3) the impact of state-dependent dynamics. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, we applied anodal tDCS targeting the left vs. right DLPFC vs. sham in 20 healthy individuals (10 males, 10 females). Immediately before and after tDCS, subjects performed the Flanker Task while we measured behavioral (reaction time and accuracy) and neurophysiological (ERP) responses. Specifically, the amplitude of N200, P300, ERN and Pe is compared before and after stimulation. RESULTS: Anodal tDCS to the left DLPFC lead to a significant improvement in reaction time, an increase in P300 amplitude and a decrease in N200 amplitude in a state-dependent manner: baseline ERP amplitudes conditioned the effects of tDCS. CONCLUSION: Given the role of these ERPs in conflict-related tasks, we speculate that tDCS is modulating the subconstructs of selective attention, conflict monitoring and response inhibition. These findings contribute to a further understanding of the role of left DLPFC in the modulation of executive function, and shed light into the mechanisms of action and the state dependent nature of tDCS.
Authors: Daniel Keeser; Thomas Meindl; Julie Bor; Ulrich Palm; Oliver Pogarell; Christoph Mulert; Jerome Brunelin; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Maximilian Reiser; Frank Padberg Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Noah S Philip; Brent G Nelson; Flavio Frohlich; Kelvin O Lim; Alik S Widge; Linda L Carpenter Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Sydney S Cash; Alik S Widge; Ishita Basu; Ali Yousefi; Britni Crocker; Rina Zelmann; Angelique C Paulk; Noam Peled; Kristen K Ellard; Daniel S Weisholtz; G Rees Cosgrove; Thilo Deckersbach; Uri T Eden; Emad N Eskandar; Darin D Dougherty Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 29.234
Authors: Laura Dubreuil-Vall; Federico Gomez-Bernal; Ana C Villegas; Patricia Cirillo; Craig Surman; Giulio Ruffini; Alik S Widge; Joan A Camprodon Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2020-11-25