Literature DB >> 31219198

Efficacy and toxicity of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy relative to effective dose 50.

Simon B Dimmitt1,2, Hans G Stampfer3, Jennifer H Martin2,4, Robin E Ferner5,6.   

Abstract

Antihypertensive drugs have usually been approved at doses near the top of their respective dose-response curves. Efficacy plateaus but adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as falls, cerebral or renal ischaemia, increase as dose is increased, especially in older patients with comorbidities. ADRs reduce adherence and may be difficult to ascertain reliably. Higher doses have generally not been shown to reduce total mortality, which provides a summary of efficacy and safety. Weight loss and other lifestyle measures are essential and may be sufficient treatment in many young and low risk patients. Most antihypertensive drug lower systolic blood pressure by around 10 mmHg, which reduces stroke and heart failure by about a quarter. Clinical trials have not been designed to demonstrate specific blood pressure treatment thresholds and targets, which are mostly extrapolated from epidemiology. Mean population oral effective dose 50 may be the most appropriate dose at which to commence antihypertensive drugs. The dose can then be titrated up if greater efficacy is demonstrated, or lowered if ADRs develop. Lower dose combination therapy may best balance benefit and harms with fewer ADRs and additive, potentially synergistic, efficacy.
© 2019 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antihypertensive; dose-response; heart failure; hypertension; polypill; stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31219198      PMCID: PMC6783604          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  88 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and toxicity of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy relative to effective dose 50.

Authors:  Simon B Dimmitt; Hans G Stampfer; Jennifer H Martin; Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dena Ettehad; Connor A Emdin; Amit Kiran; Simon G Anderson; Thomas Callender; Jonathan Emberson; John Chalmers; Anthony Rodgers; Kazem Rahimi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-12

4.  Usefulness of ophthalmoscopy in mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  S B Dimmitt; J N West; S M Eames; J M Gibson; P Gosling; W A Littler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-05-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Felodipine population dose-response and concentration-response relationships in patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  J R Wade; N C Sambol
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 6.  Optimal size of cuff bladder for indirect measurement of arterial pressure in adults.

Authors:  A E Russell; L M Wing; S A Smith; P E Aylward; R J McRitchie; R M Hassam; M J West; J P Chalmers
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 7.  Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: integrating evidence into clinical practice.

Authors:  Faiez Zannad; Wendy Gattis Stough; Patrick Rossignol; Johann Bauersachs; John J V McMurray; Karl Swedberg; Allan D Struthers; Adriaan A Voors; Luis M Ruilope; George L Bakris; Christopher M O'Connor; Mihai Gheorghiade; Robert J Mentz; Alain Cohen-Solal; Aldo P Maggioni; Farzin Beygui; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Ziad A Massy; Atul Pathak; Ileana L Piña; Hani N Sabbah; Domenic A Sica; Luigi Tavazzi; Bertram Pitt
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 8.  Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Do Not Reduce Risk of Myocardial Infarction, Cardiovascular Death, or Total Mortality: Further Evidence for the ARB-MI Paradox.

Authors:  Martin H Strauss; Alistair S Hall
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension. Report by the Management Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-06-14       Impact factor: 202.731

10.  Higher versus lower doses of ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-2 receptor blockers and beta-blockers in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ricky D Turgeon; Michael R Kolber; Peter Loewen; Ursula Ellis; James P McCormack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and toxicity of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy relative to effective dose 50.

Authors:  Simon B Dimmitt; Hans G Stampfer; Jennifer H Martin; Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Mining Important Herb Combinations of Traditional Chinese Medicine against Hypertension Based on the Symptom-Herb Network Combined with Network Pharmacology.

Authors:  Zhenhai Sun; Yunsheng Xu; Wenrong An; Siling Bi; Sai Xu; Rui Zhang; Mingyang Cong; Shouqiang Chen
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Targeting TMEM16A-encoded Ca2+-activated Cl- channels: a new paradigm for antihypertensive therapy?

Authors:  Normand Leblanc
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 18.998

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.