Literature DB >> 9732337

Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether tight control of blood pressure prevents macrovascular and microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial comparing tight control of blood pressure aiming at a blood pressure of <150/85 mm Hg (with the use of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor captopril or a beta blocker atenolol as main treatment) with less tight control aiming at a blood pressure of <180/105 mm Hg.
SETTING: 20 hospital based clinics in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.
SUBJECTS: 1148 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age 56, mean blood pressure at entry 160/94 mm Hg); 758 patients were allocated to tight control of blood pressure and 390 patients to less tight control with a median follow up of 8.4 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predefined clinical end points, fatal and non-fatal, related to diabetes, deaths related to diabetes, and all cause mortality. Surrogate measures of microvascular disease included urinary albumin excretion and retinal photography.
RESULTS: Mean blood pressure during follow up was significantly reduced in the group assigned tight blood pressure control (144/82 mm Hg) compared with the group assigned to less tight control (154/87 mm Hg) (P<0.0001). Reductions in risk in the group assigned to tight control compared with that assigned to less tight control were 24% in diabetes related end points (95% confidence interval 8% to 38%) (P=0.0046), 32% in deaths related to diabetes (6% to 51%) (P=0.019), 44% in strokes (11% to 65%) (P=0.013), and 37% in microvascular end points (11% to 56%) (P=0.0092), predominantly owing to a reduced risk of retinal photocoagulation. There was a non-significant reduction in all cause mortality. After nine years of follow up the group assigned to tight blood pressure control also had a 34% reduction in risk in the proportion of patients with deterioration of retinopathy by two steps (99% confidence interval 11% to 50%) (P=0.0004) and a 47% reduced risk (7% to 70%) (P=0.004) of deterioration in visual acuity by three lines of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart. After nine years of follow up 29% of patients in the group assigned to tight control required three or more treatments to lower blood pressure to achieve target blood pressures.
CONCLUSION: Tight blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes achieves a clinically important reduction in the risk of deaths related to diabetes, complications related to diabetes, progression of diabetic retinopathy, and deterioration in visual acuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9732337      PMCID: PMC28659     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  38 in total

Review 1.  [Arterial hypertension and diabetes. Members of the Board of Directors and Scientific Directors of ALFEDIAM].

Authors:  B Bauduceau; G Chatellier; D Cordonnier; M Marre; A Mimran; L Monnier; J P Sauvanet; P Valensi; N Balarac
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.041

2.  Development and progression of renal disease in Pima Indians with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  R G Nelson; P H Bennett; G J Beck; M Tan; W C Knowler; W E Mitch; G H Hirschman; B D Myers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Effect of diuretic-based antihypertensive treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in older diabetic patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program Cooperative Research Group.

Authors:  J D Curb; S L Pressel; J A Cutler; P J Savage; W B Applegate; H Black; G Camel; B R Davis; P H Frost; N Gonzalez; G Guthrie; A Oberman; G H Rutan; J Stamler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-12

5.  The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-11-24

6.  Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS: 23)

Authors:  R C Turner; H Millns; H A Neil; I M Stratton; S E Manley; D R Matthews; R R Holman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-14

7.  United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, 30: diabetic retinopathy at diagnosis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors.

Authors:  E M Kohner; S J Aldington; I M Stratton; S E Manley; R R Holman; D R Matthews; R C Turner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-03

8.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group.

Authors:  L Hansson; A Zanchetti; S G Carruthers; B Dahlöf; D Elmfeldt; S Julius; J Ménard; K H Rahn; H Wedel; S Westerling
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Blood pressure and end-stage renal disease in men.

Authors:  M J Klag; P K Whelton; B L Randall; J D Neaton; F L Brancati; C E Ford; N B Shulman; J Stamler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-01-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1523 in total

Review 1.  The UK prospective diabetes study (UKPDS): clinical and therapeutic implications for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  P King; I Peacock; R Donnelly
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Beta-blockers in the management of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: is there a role?

Authors:  F Dunne; M J Kendall; U Martin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Is it possible to predict diabetic kidney disease?

Authors:  S M Thomas; G C Viberti
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Diabetes care needs evidence based interventions to reduce risk of vascular disease.

Authors:  C D Byrne; S H Wild
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-10

5.  Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analysis. Are an absurdity.

Authors:  B G Charlton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-30

6.  "Normal" blood glucose and coronary risk.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor; D L Wingard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-06

7.  BMJ introduces a fast track system for papers. We will offer to publish exceptional papers within four weeks

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

8.  Treating type 2 diabetes. Study was conducted in exemplary fashion.

Authors:  K M Narayan; G L Beckles; E W Gregg; D F Williamson; J Saaddine; M M Engelgau; F Vinicor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

Review 9.  Role of ACE inhibitors in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D J Cordonnier; P Zaoui; S Halimi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Jorge G Arroyo
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.