Literature DB >> 31215720

Evoked Potentials Recorded From the Spinal Cord During Neurostimulation for Pain: A Computational Modeling Study.

Carlos J Anaya1,2, Hans J Zander1,2, Robert D Graham1,2, Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian1,2, Scott F Lempka1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for pain is typically implemented in an open-loop manner using parameters that remain largely unchanged. To improve the overall efficacy and consistency of SCS, one closed-loop approach proposes to use evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) recorded from the SCS lead(s) as a feedback control signal to guide parameter selection. The goal of this study was to use a computational modeling approach to investigate the source of these ECAP recordings and technical and physiological factors that affect their composition.
METHODS: We developed a computational model that coupled a finite element model of lower thoracic SCS with multicompartment models of sensory axons within the spinal cord. We used a reciprocity-based approach to calculate SCS-induced ECAPs recorded from the SCS lead.
RESULTS: Our model ECAPs contained a triphasic, P1, N1, P2 morphology. The model P2-N1 amplitudes and conduction velocities agreed with previous experimental data from human subjects. Model results suggested that the ECAPs are dominated by the activation of axons with diameters 8.7-10.0 μm located in the dorsal aspect of the spinal cord. We also observed changes in the ECAP amplitude and shape due to the electrode location relative to the vertebrae and spinal cord.
CONCLUSION: Our modeling results suggest that clinically effective SCS relies on the activation of numerous axons within a narrow fiber diameter range and that several factors affect the composition of the ECAP recordings. These results can improve how we interpret and implement these recordings in a potential closed-loop approach to SCS.
© 2019 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; computer simulation; evoked potentials; spinal cord; spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31215720      PMCID: PMC6920600          DOI: 10.1111/ner.12965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  36 in total

1.  Microsurgical anatomy of the dorsal thoracic rootlets and dorsal root entry zones.

Authors:  Melih Bozkurt; Suat Canbay; Gabriel F Neves; Erinç Aktüre; Emin Fidan; M Shahriar Salamat; Mustafa K Başkaya
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Analysis of deep brain stimulation electrode characteristics for neural recording.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report.

Authors:  C N Shealy; J T Mortimer; J B Reswick
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1967 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Compound action potentials recorded in the human spinal cord during neurostimulation for pain relief.

Authors:  John L Parker; Dean M Karantonis; Peter S Single; Milan Obradovic; Michael J Cousins
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  MR assessment of the normal position of the spinal cord in the spinal canal.

Authors:  J Holsheimer; J A den Boer; J J Struijk; A R Rozeboom
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Human spinal cord potentials evoked by different sources of stimulation and conduction velocities along the cord.

Authors:  Y Maruyama; K Shimoji; H Shimizu; H Kuribayashi; H Fujioka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Biomechanics of vertebral level, geometry, and transcortical tumors in the metastatic spine.

Authors:  Craig E Tschirhart; Joel A Finkelstein; Cari M Whyne
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Innovations in spinal cord stimulation for pain.

Authors:  Scott F Lempka; Parag G Patil
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-11-12

Review 9.  Mechanisms and models of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Tianhe C Zhang; John J Janik; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Which Neuronal Elements are Activated Directly by Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Jan Holsheimer
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2002-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Neural Recruitment During Conventional, Burst, and 10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain.

Authors:  Evan R Rogers; Hans J Zander; Scott F Lempka
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Sensing Evoked Compound Action Potentials from the Spinal Cord: Novel Preclinical and Clinical Considerations for the Pain Management Researcher and Clinician.

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; Hank Bink; David Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  A New Direction for Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation: Combining Contemporary Therapy Paradigms with Evoked Compound Action Potential Sensing.

Authors:  Ricardo Vallejo; Krishnan Chakravarthy; Andrew Will; Karen Trutnau; David Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.832

4.  The Evoked Compound Action Potential as a Predictor for Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: Tools for Automatic Spinal Cord Stimulator Programming and Control.

Authors:  Julie G Pilitsis; Krishnan V Chakravarthy; Andrew J Will; Karen C Trutnau; Kristin N Hageman; David A Dinsmoor; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.