Literature DB >> 22653495

Microsurgical anatomy of the dorsal thoracic rootlets and dorsal root entry zones.

Melih Bozkurt1, Suat Canbay, Gabriel F Neves, Erinç Aktüre, Emin Fidan, M Shahriar Salamat, Mustafa K Başkaya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For successful DREZ (dorsal root entry zone) surgery, optimal neuroanatomical orientation and precise microsurgical dissection are required. Although cervical, lumbar, and sacral spinal segments have been studied in detail, such information is not available for thoracic segments. The objective of this anatomical study is to comprehensively illustrate the microanatomical features of the thoracic DREZs and their variations.
METHODS: Fifteen formalin-fixed adult cadaveric spinal cords from T1 to T12 were used. The dorsal rootlet numbers, distance between the posteromedial and posterolateral sulcus, length of each DREZ, length of each segment, and mean length of the dorsal rootlets were measured under a surgical microscope.
RESULTS: The longest DREZs were observed at the T6, T7, and T8 segments with mean values of 15.3 mm, 15.6 mm, and 15.4 mm, respectively. The longest segment was observed at the T10 segment with a mean value of 21.0 mm, and the shortest segment was observed at the T1 segment with a mean value of 13.5 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: The highest dorsal rootlet density is at the T1 segment of the spinal cord, can be easily distinguished visually, and may be a useful surgical landmark. The DREZs in T6-7 segments are longest, while these two segments have the least number of rootlets. Because the dorsolateral tract is remarkably narrow and the dorsal horn is exceedingly deep, DREZ surgery at the thoracic level may be difficult and risky for the dorsal column and corticospinal tract. Acquaintance with the microanatomy of the DREZ in the thoracic spinal cord is crucial to DREZ surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22653495     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-012-1395-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  7 in total

1.  A Modified Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block via Thoracic Intervertebral Foramen in an Adolescent Patient: A Case Report.

Authors:  Emiliano Petrucci; Franco Marinangeli; Barbara Pizzi; Francesco Sciorio; Gioele Marrocco; Massimo Antonio Innamorato; Marco Cascella; Alessandro Vittori
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Evoked Potentials Recorded From the Spinal Cord During Neurostimulation for Pain: A Computational Modeling Study.

Authors:  Carlos J Anaya; Hans J Zander; Robert D Graham; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Scott F Lempka
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-06-19

3.  Neural Recruitment During Conventional, Burst, and 10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain.

Authors:  Evan R Rogers; Hans J Zander; Scott F Lempka
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 4.  Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Identify Trigeminal System Abnormalities in Classical Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Danielle D DeSouza; Mojgan Hodaie; Karen D Davis
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.856

5.  Clinical anatomy and significance of the thoracic intervertebral foramen: A cadaveric study and review of the literature.

Authors:  Grigorios Gkasdaris; Grigorios Tripsianis; Konstantinos Kotopoulos; Stylianos Kapetanakis
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

6.  A 3D subject-specific model of the spinal subarachnoid space with anatomically realistic ventral and dorsal spinal cord nerve rootlets.

Authors:  Lucas R Sass; Mohammadreza Khani; Gabryel Connely Natividad; R Shane Tubbs; Olivier Baledent; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2017-12-19

Review 7.  A Literature Review of Dorsal Root Entry Zone Complex (DREZC) Lesions: Integration of Translational Data for an Evolution to More Accurate Nomenclature.

Authors:  Ognjen Visnjevac; Frederick Ma; Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.133

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.