Literature DB >> 22188868

Compound action potentials recorded in the human spinal cord during neurostimulation for pain relief.

John L Parker1, Dean M Karantonis, Peter S Single, Milan Obradovic, Michael J Cousins.   

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord provides effective pain relief to hundreds of thousands of chronic neuropathic pain sufferers. The therapy involves implantation of an electrode array into the epidural space of the subject and then stimulation of the dorsal column with electrical pulses. The stimulation depolarises axons and generates propagating action potentials that interfere with the perception of pain. Despite the long-term clinical experience with spinal cord stimulation, the mechanism of action is not understood, and no direct evidence of the properties of neurons being stimulated has been presented. Here we report novel measurements of evoked compound action potentials from the spinal cords of patients undergoing stimulation for pain relief. The results reveal that Aβ sensory nerve fibres are recruited at therapeutic stimulation levels and the Aβ potential amplitude correlates with the degree of coverage of the painful area. Aβ-evoked responses are not measurable below a threshold stimulation level, and their amplitude increases with increasing stimulation current. At high currents, additional late responses are observed. Our results contribute towards efforts to define the mechanism of spinal cord stimulation. The minimally invasive recording technique we have developed provides data previously obtained only through microelectrode techniques in spinal cords of animals. Our observations also allow the development of systems that use neuronal recording in a feedback loop to control neurostimulation on a continuous basis and deliver more effective pain relief. This is one of numerous benefits that in vivo electrophysiological recording can bring to a broad range of neuromodulation therapies. Copyright Â
© 2011 International Association for the Study of Pain. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22188868     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  22 in total

1.  Spike history neural response model.

Authors:  Tatiana Kameneva; Miganoosh Abramian; Daniele Zarelli; Dragan Nĕsić; Anthony N Burkitt; Hamish Meffin; David B Grayden
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 2.  Spinal stimulation for pain: future applications.

Authors:  Konstantin V Slavin
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Modulation of activity and conduction in single dorsal column axons by kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Nathan D Crosby; John J Janik; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: evidence and theory for mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Jacob Caylor; Rajiv Reddy; Sopyda Yin; Christina Cui; Mingxiong Huang; Charles Huang; Rao Ramesh; Dewleen G Baker; Alan Simmons; Dmitri Souza; Samer Narouze; Ricardo Vallejo; Imanuel Lerman
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2019-06-28

Review 5.  Spinal cord stimulation programming: a crash course.

Authors:  Breanna Sheldon; Michael D Staudt; Lucian Williams; Tessa A Harland; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Evoked Potentials Recorded From the Spinal Cord During Neurostimulation for Pain: A Computational Modeling Study.

Authors:  Carlos J Anaya; Hans J Zander; Robert D Graham; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Scott F Lempka
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-06-19

Review 7.  Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrei D Sdrulla; Yun Guan; Srinivasa N Raja
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Sustained Long-Term Outcomes With Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation: 12-Month Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label Avalon Study.

Authors:  Marc Russo; Charles Brooker; Michael J Cousins; Nathan Taylor; Tillman Boesel; Richard Sullivan; Lewis Holford; Erin Hanson; Gerrit Eduard Gmel; Nastaran Hesam Shariati; Lawrence Poree; John Parker
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Dorsal column stimulator applications.

Authors:  Claudio Yampolsky; Santiago Hem; Damián Bendersky
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-10-31

Review 10.  Closed-loop neurostimulation: the clinical experience.

Authors:  Felice T Sun; Martha J Morrell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.