Literature DB >> 31209312

Uncertainty about the impact of social decisions increases prosocial behaviour.

Andreas Kappes1, Anne-Marie Nussberger2, Nadira S Faber2,3, Guy Kahane3, Julian Savulescu3, Molly J Crockett4.   

Abstract

Uncertainty about how our choices will affect others infuses social life. Past research suggests uncertainty has a negative effect on prosocial behaviour1-12 by enabling people to adopt self-serving narratives about their actions1,13. We show that uncertainty does not always promote selfishness. We introduce a distinction between two types of uncertainty that have opposite effects on prosocial behaviour. Previous work focused on outcome uncertainty (uncertainty about whether or not a decision will lead to a particular outcome). However, as soon as people's decisions might have negative consequences for others, there is also impact uncertainty (uncertainty about how others' well-being will be impacted by the negative outcome). Consistent with past research1-12, we found decreased prosocial behaviour under outcome uncertainty. In contrast, prosocial behaviour was increased under impact uncertainty in incentivized economic decisions and hypothetical decisions about infectious disease threats. Perceptions of social norms paralleled the behavioural effects. The effect of impact uncertainty on prosocial behaviour did not depend on the individuation of others or the mere mention of harm, and was stronger when impact uncertainty was made more salient. Our findings offer insights into communicating uncertainty, especially in contexts where prosocial behaviour is paramount, such as responding to infectious disease threats.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 31209312      PMCID: PMC6639117          DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0372-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  15 in total

1.  Third-party forgiveness: (not) forgiving your close other's betrayer.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Green; Jeni L Burnette; Jody L Davis
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-01-11

2.  Justifying decisions in social dilemmas: justification pressures and tacit coordination under environmental uncertainty.

Authors:  Erik W de Kwaadsteniet; Eric van Dijk; Arjaan Wit; David De Cremer; Mark de Rooij
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-12

3.  Memory for flip-flopping: detection and recollection of political contradictions.

Authors:  Adam L Putnam; Christopher N Wahlheim; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-10

Review 4.  Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty.

Authors:  Michael L Platt; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

6.  Morality constrains the default representation of what is possible.

Authors:  Jonathan Phillips; Fiery Cushman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making.

Authors:  Molly J Crockett; Zeb Kurth-Nelson; Jenifer Z Siegel; Peter Dayan; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  From Blame to Punishment: Disrupting Prefrontal Cortex Activity Reveals Norm Enforcement Mechanisms.

Authors:  Joshua W Buckholtz; Justin W Martin; Michael T Treadway; Katherine Jan; David H Zald; Owen Jones; René Marois
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; David Wendler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-13

10.  Who's been framed? Framing effects are reduced in financial gambles made for others.

Authors:  Fenja V Ziegler; Richard J Tunney
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2015-04-02
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Katherine Baicker; Paulo S Boggio; Valerio Capraro; Aleksandra Cichocka; Mina Cikara; Molly J Crockett; Alia J Crum; Karen M Douglas; James N Druckman; John Drury; Oeindrila Dube; Naomi Ellemers; Eli J Finkel; James H Fowler; Michele Gelfand; Shihui Han; S Alexander Haslam; Jolanda Jetten; Shinobu Kitayama; Dean Mobbs; Lucy E Napper; Dominic J Packer; Gordon Pennycook; Ellen Peters; Richard E Petty; David G Rand; Stephen D Reicher; Simone Schnall; Azim Shariff; Linda J Skitka; Sandra Susan Smith; Cass R Sunstein; Nassim Tabri; Joshua A Tucker; Sander van der Linden; Paul van Lange; Kim A Weeden; Michael J A Wohl; Jamil Zaki; Sean R Zion; Robb Willer
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-04-30

2.  How peer influence shapes value computation in moral decision-making.

Authors:  Hongbo Yu; Jenifer Z Siegel; John A Clithero; Molly J Crockett
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-03-16

3.  Sure-thing vs. probabilistic charitable giving: Experimental evidence on the role of individual differences in risky and ambiguous charitable decision-making.

Authors:  Philipp Schoenegger; Miguel Costa-Gomes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Changes in risk perception and self-reported protective behaviour during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

Authors:  Toby Wise; Tomislav D Zbozinek; Giorgia Michelini; Cindy C Hagan; Dean Mobbs
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Motivations, barriers, and communication recommendations for promoting face coverings during the COVID-19 pandemic: Survey findings from a diverse sample.

Authors:  Rhyan N Vereen; Allison J Lazard; Simone C Frank; Marlyn Pulido; Ana Paula C Richter; Isabella C A Higgins; Victoria S Shelus; Sara M Vandegrift; Marissa G Hall; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Does culture matter social distancing under the COVID-19 pandemic?

Authors:  Toan Luu Duc Huynh
Journal:  Saf Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.877

7.  The social cost of gathering information for trust decisions.

Authors:  I Ma; A G Sanfey; W J Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A behavioral economics perspective on the COVID-19 vaccine amid public mistrust.

Authors:  Jessica Londeree Saleska; Kristen R Choi
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Prosocial Orientation of Russians During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Caring for Others and Yourself.

Authors:  Pavel A Kislyakov; Elena A Shmeleva
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-08

10.  Psychology of personal data donation.

Authors:  Anya Skatova; James Goulding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.