Literature DB >> 18000100

Justifying decisions in social dilemmas: justification pressures and tacit coordination under environmental uncertainty.

Erik W de Kwaadsteniet1, Eric van Dijk, Arjaan Wit, David De Cremer, Mark de Rooij.   

Abstract

This article investigates how justification pressures influence harvesting decisions in common resource dilemmas. The authors argue that when a division rule prescribes a specific harvest level, such as under environmental certainty, people adhere more strongly to this division rule when they have to justify their decisions to fellow group members. When a division rule does not prescribe a specific harvest level, such as under environmental uncertainty, people restrict their harvests when they have to justify their decisions to fellow group members. The results of two experimental studies corroborate this line of reasoning. The findings are discussed in terms of tacit coordination. The authors specify conditions under which justification pressures may or may not facilitate efficient coordination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18000100     DOI: 10.1177/0146167207307490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  3 in total

1.  Uncertainty about the impact of social decisions increases prosocial behaviour.

Authors:  Andreas Kappes; Anne-Marie Nussberger; Nadira S Faber; Guy Kahane; Julian Savulescu; Molly J Crockett
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-07-09

2.  From reductive to generative crisis: businesspeople using polysemous justifications to make sense of COVID-19.

Authors:  Ioana Sendroiu
Journal:  Am J Cult Sociol       Date:  2022-01-19

3.  A dual-process approach to prosocial behavior under COVID-19 uncertainty.

Authors:  Daniela Costa; Nuno Fernandes; Joana Arantes; José Keating
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.