Literature DB >> 33740537

How peer influence shapes value computation in moral decision-making.

Hongbo Yu1, Jenifer Z Siegel2, John A Clithero3, Molly J Crockett4.   

Abstract

Moral behavior is susceptible to peer influence. How does information from peers influence moral preferences? We used drift-diffusion modeling to show that peer influence changes the value of moral behavior by prioritizing the choice attributes that align with peers' goals. Study 1 (N = 100; preregistered) showed that participants accurately inferred the goals of prosocial and antisocial peers when observing their moral decisions. In Study 2 (N = 68), participants made moral decisions before and after observing the decisions of a prosocial or antisocial peer. Peer observation caused participants' own preferences to resemble those of their peers. This peer influence effect on value computation manifested as an increased weight on choice attributes promoting the peers' goals that occurred independently from peer influence on initial choice bias. Participants' self-reported awareness of influence tracked more closely with computational measures of prosocial than antisocial influence. Our findings have implications for bolstering and blocking the effects of prosocial and antisocial influence on moral behavior.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian hierarchical modeling; Drift diffusion model; Goal; Moral decision-making; Social influence

Year:  2021        PMID: 33740537      PMCID: PMC8085736          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  53 in total

1.  Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Accounting for attention in sequential sampling models of decision making.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-13

Review 3.  Neurocomputational approaches to social behavior.

Authors:  Arkady Konovalov; Jie Hu; Christian C Ruff
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-04-21

4.  Prosocial modeling: A meta-analytic review and synthesis.

Authors:  Haesung Jung; Eunjin Seo; Eunjoo Han; Marlone D Henderson; Erika A Patall
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Learning moral values: Another's desire to punish enhances one's own punitive behavior.

Authors:  Oriel FeldmanHall; A Ross Otto; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-06-07

6.  Dietary self-control is related to the speed with which attributes of healthfulness and tastiness are processed.

Authors:  Nicolette Sullivan; Cendri Hutcherson; Alison Harris; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-12-16

Review 7.  The neural basis of metacognitive ability.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  On the importance of avoiding shortcuts in applying cognitive models to hierarchical data.

Authors:  Udo Boehm; Maarten Marsman; Dora Matzke; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-08

9.  Confidence drives a neural confirmation bias.

Authors:  Max Rollwage; Alisa Loosen; Tobias U Hauser; Rani Moran; Raymond J Dolan; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 10.  Is There a 'Social' Brain? Implementations and Algorithms.

Authors:  Patricia L Lockwood; Matthew A J Apps; Steve W C Chang
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Characterization of the Core Determinants of Social Influence From a Computational and Cognitive Perspective.

Authors:  Hyeji Lee; Dongil Chung
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  How conformity can lead to polarised social behaviour.

Authors:  Folco Panizza; Alexander Vostroknutov; Giorgio Coricelli
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Distinct neurocomputational mechanisms support informational and socially normative conformity.

Authors:  Ali Mahmoodi; Hamed Nili; Dan Bang; Carsten Mehring; Bahador Bahrami
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 8.029

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.