Filiz Celebi1, Emetullah Cindil2, Dauren Sarsenov3, Bulent Unalan4, Cem Balcı5. 1. Department of Radiology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, elbuken.filiz@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Department of General Surgery, Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 5. Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Lerner School of Medicine, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic ability and time efficiency of contrast-enhanced (CE) whole body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) protocol and non-CE (NCE) protocol. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patients with known primary tumors underwent whole-body hybrid FDG PET/MRI during the follow-up of their malignancies with the use of NCE and CE protocols. The NCE PET/MRI protocol consisted of diffusion-weighted (b = 0 and 800 s/mm2) and T1-weighted Turbo Flash in the axial plane and T2-weighted HASTE sequence in the coronal planes (Σ = 25 min). The CE PET/MRI protocol was performed by acquiring axial serial CE 3D FS VIBE images in the upper abdomen, completing the whole body in the late phase in the axial plane (Σ = 30 min). RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the total number of lesions detected by the CE protocol (median 2, interquartile range (IQR) 0-14) and that detected by the NCE protocol (median 1, IQR 0-5; p < 0.001). More malignancies were detected in the abdomen (p < 0.001) and brain (p < 0.001) with the CE PET/MRI protocol, whereas no significant difference was present when comparing the 2 protocols in the detection of malignancies in the head and neck (p = 0.356), thorax (p = 0.09), lymph nodes (p = 0.196), and bone (p = 0.414). CONCLUSION: The CE FDG PET/MRI protocol enables fast and accurate detection of malignancies compared to the NCE FDG PET/MRI protocol, particularly in the upper abdomen and brain. Diagnostic ability and time efficiency can be increased with the proposed short CE protocol in place of the whole body PET/MRI protocol including both NCE and CE imaging sequences.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic ability and time efficiency of contrast-enhanced (CE) whole body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) protocol and non-CE (NCE) protocol. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patients with known primary tumors underwent whole-body hybrid FDG PET/MRI during the follow-up of their malignancies with the use of NCE and CE protocols. The NCE PET/MRI protocol consisted of diffusion-weighted (b = 0 and 800 s/mm2) and T1-weighted Turbo Flash in the axial plane and T2-weighted HASTE sequence in the coronal planes (Σ = 25 min). The CE PET/MRI protocol was performed by acquiring axial serial CE 3D FS VIBE images in the upper abdomen, completing the whole body in the late phase in the axial plane (Σ = 30 min). RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the total number of lesions detected by the CE protocol (median 2, interquartile range (IQR) 0-14) and that detected by the NCE protocol (median 1, IQR 0-5; p < 0.001). More malignancies were detected in the abdomen (p < 0.001) and brain (p < 0.001) with the CE PET/MRI protocol, whereas no significant difference was present when comparing the 2 protocols in the detection of malignancies in the head and neck (p = 0.356), thorax (p = 0.09), lymph nodes (p = 0.196), and bone (p = 0.414). CONCLUSION: The CE FDG PET/MRI protocol enables fast and accurate detection of malignancies compared to the NCE FDG PET/MRI protocol, particularly in the upper abdomen and brain. Diagnostic ability and time efficiency can be increased with the proposed short CE protocol in place of the whole body PET/MRI protocol including both NCE and CE imaging sequences.
Authors: F E Lecouvet; A Larbi; V Pasoglou; P Omoumi; B Tombal; N Michoux; J Malghem; R Lhommel; B C Vande Berg Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Satoshi Takeuchi; Eric M Rohren; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Lianchun Xiao; Jeffrey S Morris; Homer A Macapinlac; Manal M Hassan; Ahmed O Kaseb Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Beomsik Kang; Jeong Min Lee; Yong Sub Song; Sungmin Woo; Bo Yun Hur; Ju Hyeon Jeon; Jin Chul Paeng Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 3.959