Literature DB >> 27516446

Comparison of the Impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT on Clinical Management in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Emmanouil Panagiotidis1, Alshaima Alshammari2, Sofia Michopoulou2, Evangelia Skoura2, Keval Naik3, Emmanouil Maragkoudakis3, Mullan Mohmaduvesh3, Mohammed Al-Harbi2, Maria Belda2, Martyn E Caplin3, Christos Toumpanakis3, Jamshed Bomanji2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG with respect to the management plan and to evaluate the prognostic value of both tracers.
METHODS: A total of 104 patients (55 male and 49 female; median age, 58 y; range, 20-90 y) with histologically proven neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) underwent both 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Twenty-eight patients (26.9%) had poorly differentiated tumors, and 76 (73.1%) had well-differentiated tumors. PET/CT results and SUVs were compared with prognostic factors such as histologic grade (G1, G2, or G3, for low-grade [well differentiated], intermediate-grade [moderately differentiated], and high-grade [poorly differentiated], respectively), chromogranin A, and proliferation index (Ki-67).
RESULTS: The 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT findings were discordant in 65 patients (62.5%) and concordant in 39 patients (37.5%). The results changed the therapeutic plan in 84 patients (80.8%). In 22 patients (21.1%), decision making was based on the 18F-FDG findings; in 32 (30.8%), on the findings with both radiotracers; and in 50 (48.1%), on the 68Ga-DOTATATE findings. The most frequent management decision based on 18F-FDG was initiation of chemotherapy (10 patients, 47.6%). The most common treatment decision due to 68Ga-DOTATATE was initiation of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (14 patients, 27.4%). In 11 (39.2%) of 28 patients with poorly differentiated NETs, the management decision was based on only the 18F-FDG results. For 68Ga-DOTATATE, SUVmax was higher for G1 tumors and lower for G3 tumors (P = 0.012). However, no significant differences in 18F-FDG-derived SUVs were observed between different grades (P = 0.38). The Mann-Whitney test showed significant differences in 68Ga-DOTATATE SUVmax between tumors with a Ki-67 of less than 5% and tumors with a Ki-67 of more than 5% (P = 0.004), without significance differences in 18F-FDG SUVmax Log-rank analysis showed statistically significant differences in survival for patients with bone metastasis versus soft-tissue or no metastasis for both 18F-FDG (P = 0.037) and 68Ga-DOTATATE (P = 0.047). Overall survival declined rapidly with increasing grade (P = 0.001), at an estimated 91 mo for G1, 59 mo for G2, and 48 mo for G3.
CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT had no clinical impact on G1 NETs and a moderate impact on G2 NETs. However, in poorly differentiated NETs, 18F-FDG PET/CT plays a significant clinical role in combination with 68Ga-DOTATATE. 68Ga DOTATATE SUVmax relates to grade and Ki-67 and can be used prognostically.
© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG PET/CT; 68Ga-DOTATATE; clinical impact; neuroendocrine tumors; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27516446     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  45 in total

1.  Non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors: a 111In-Pentetreotide SPECT/CT diagnostic study.

Authors:  Angela Spanu; Orazio Schillaci; Bastiana Piras; Diego F Calvisi; Antonio Falchi; Roberta Danieli; Susanna Nuvoli; Franca Dore; Giuseppe Madeddu
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-01

2.  Most of the Intended Management Changes After 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Are Implemented.

Authors:  Jeremie Calais; Johannes Czernin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Jeannine Gartmann; Anthony P Heaney; Andrew E Hendifar; Joseph R Pisegna; J Randolph Hecht; Edward M Wolin; Roger Slavik; Pawan Gupta; Andrew Quon; Christiaan Schiepers; Martin S Allen-Auerbach; Ken Herrmann
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Added Value of Contrast Medium in Whole-Body Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison between Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Protocols.

Authors:  Filiz Celebi; Emetullah Cindil; Dauren Sarsenov; Bulent Unalan; Cem Balcı
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 4.  Molecular imaging in neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, controversies, unresolved issues, and roles in management.

Authors:  Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.243

5.  Prognostic value of somatostatin receptor expressing tumor volume calculated from 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Akira Toriihara; Lucia Baratto; Tomomi Nobashi; Sonya Park; Negin Hatami; Guido Davidzon; Pamela L Kunz; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Theranostic implications of molecular imaging phenotype of well-differentiated pulmonary carcinoid based on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Lamiaa Zidan; Amir Iravani; Grace Kong; Tim Akhurst; Michael Michael; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, current status, and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.512

8.  Neuroendocrine hepatic metastatic disease: the surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Seth J Concors; Jessica E Maxwell
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-04-27

9.  Prognostic Utility of Total 68Ga-DOTATATE-Avid Tumor Volume in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Amit Tirosh; Georgios Z Papadakis; Corina Millo; Dima Hammoud; Samira M Sadowski; Peter Herscovitch; Karel Pacak; Stephen J Marx; Lily Yang; Pavel Nockel; Jasmine Shell; Patience Green; Xavier M Keutgen; Dhaval Patel; Naris Nilubol; Electron Kebebew
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  An international expert opinion statement on the utility of PET/MR for imaging of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  Jad S Husseini; Bárbara Juarez Amorim; Angel Torrado-Carvajal; Vinay Prabhu; David Groshar; Lale Umutlu; Ken Herrmann; Lina García Cañamaque; José Ramón García Garzón; William E Palmer; Pedram Heidari; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih; Jacob Sosna; Cristina Matushita; Juliano Cerci; Marcelo Queiroz; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Marcello H Nogueira-Barbosa; Ronald J H Borra; Thomas C Kwee; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Laura Evangelista; Marco Salvatore; Alberto Cuocolo; Andrea Soricelli; Christian Herold; Andrea Laghi; Marius Mayerhoefer; Umar Mahmood; Ciprian Catana; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Bruce Rosen; Onofrio A Catalano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.