Literature DB >> 27942837

Refining prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma through incorporation of metabolic imaging biomarkers.

Satoshi Takeuchi1,2, Eric M Rohren2,3, Reham Abdel-Wahab4,5, Lianchun Xiao6, Jeffrey S Morris6, Homer A Macapinlac2, Manal M Hassan3, Ahmed O Kaseb7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomopraphy/computed tomography (FDGPET/CT) has been proven to be useful for imaging many types of cancer; however, its role is not well defined in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We assessed the prognostic value of metabolic imaging biomarkers as established by baseline pretreatment FDG PET/CT in patients with HCC.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients with HCC who underwent FDG PET/CT before initial treatment from May 2013 through May 2014. Four PET/CT parameters were measured: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and tumor-to-normal-liver SUV ratio (TNR). Optimal cut-off values for the PET/CT parameters to stratify patients in terms of overall survival (OS) were determined. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine whether the PET/CT parameters could add to the prognostic value of the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) scoring system and the Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system.
RESULTS: The analysis included 56 patients. Univariate analysis of the association between OS and continuous variables, including the PET/CT parameters SUVmax, TLG, tumor size, total bilirubin level, and alkaline phosphatase level were significant predictors of OS. SUVmax ≥ 11.7, TLG ≥ 1,341, MTV ≥ 230 mL, and TNR ≥ 4.8 were identified as cut-off values. Multivariate analysis revealed that SUVmax ≥ 11.7 and TNR ≥ 4.8 were independent factors predicting a poor prognosis in both the CLIP scoring system and the BCLC staging system, as was TLG in the BCLC staging system.
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment FDG PET/CT in patients with HCC can add to the prognostic value of standard clinical measures. Incorporation of imaging biomarkers derived from FDG PET/CT into HCC staging systems should be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCLC staging system; CLIP scoring system; FDG PET/CT; Hepatocellular carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27942837      PMCID: PMC5400685          DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3583-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  27 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score): its value and limitations, and a proposal for a new staging system, the Japan Integrated Staging Score (JIS score).

Authors:  Masatoshi Kudo; Hobyung Chung; Yukio Osaki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  A new prognostic classification for predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hépatocellulaire.

Authors:  S Chevret; J C Trinchet; D Mathieu; A A Rached; M Beaugrand; C Chastang
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis predict outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Remy Lim; Anne Eaton; Nancy Y Lee; Jeremy Setton; Nisha Ohri; Shyam Rao; Richard Wong; Matthew Fury; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  The role of preoperative [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in predicting early recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinomas.

Authors:  Sung Gwe Ahn; Sung Hoon Kim; Tae Joo Jeon; Ho Jin Cho; Sae Byeol Choi; Mi Jin Yun; Jong Doo Lee; Kyung Sik Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Josep M Llovet; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification.

Authors:  J M Llovet; C Brú; J Bruix
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.115

7.  11C-acetate and 18F-FDG PET/CT for clinical staging and selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation on the basis of Milan criteria: surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Tan To Cheung; Chi Lai Ho; Chung Mau Lo; Sirong Chen; See Ching Chan; Kenneth S H Chok; James Y Fung; Albert Chi Yan Chan; William Sharr; Thomas Yau; Ronnie T P Poon; Sheung Tat Fan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lei Jiang; Hui Tan; Cedric M Panje; Haojun Yu; Yan Xiu; Hongcheng Shi
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.794

9.  In vivo assessment of glucose metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma with FDG-PET.

Authors:  T Torizuka; N Tamaki; T Inokuma; Y Magata; S Sasayama; Y Yonekura; A Tanaka; Y Yamaoka; K Yamamoto; J Konishi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  18F-FDG PET/CT as an indicator of progression-free and overall survival in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Colleen M Costelloe; Homer A Macapinlac; John E Madewell; Nancy E Fitzgerald; Osama R Mawlawi; Eric M Rohren; A Kevin Raymond; Valerae O Lewis; Peter M Anderson; Roland L Bassett; Robyn K Harrell; Edith M Marom
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  5 in total

1.  Transcriptomics Associates Molecular Features with 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT Imaging Phenotype and Its Potential Relationship to Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Sandi A Kwee; Maarit Tiirikainen; Miles M Sato; Jared D Acoba; Runmin Wei; Wei Jia; Loic Le Marchand; Linda L Wong
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Added Value of Contrast Medium in Whole-Body Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison between Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Protocols.

Authors:  Filiz Celebi; Emetullah Cindil; Dauren Sarsenov; Bulent Unalan; Cem Balcı
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Impact of the EARL harmonization program on automatic delineation of metabolic active tumour volumes (MATVs).

Authors:  Charline Lasnon; Blandine Enilorac; Hosni Popotte; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  Predicting tumor recurrence using metabolic indices of 18F-FDG PET/CT prior to orthotopic liver transplantationfor hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Enci Ding; Dongyan Lu; Lijuan Wei; Xuemin Feng; Jie Shen; Wengui Xu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  CMBD: a manually curated cancer metabolic biomarker knowledge database.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Xingyun Liu; Li Shen; Yuxin Lin; Bairong Shen
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.451

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.