Philipp Lohmann1, Gabriele Stoffels2, Garry Ceccon3, Marion Rapp4, Michael Sabel4, Christian P Filss2,5, Marcel A Kamp4, Carina Stegmayr2, Bernd Neumaier2, Nadim J Shah2,6,7, Karl-Josef Langen2,5,7, Norbert Galldiks2,3,8. 1. Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., 52428, Jülich, Germany. p.lohmann@fz-juelich.de. 2. Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., 52428, Jülich, Germany. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany. 6. Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany. 7. Department of Neurology, Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA) - Section JARA-Brain, Jülich, Germany. 8. Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the potential of textural feature analysis of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET to differentiate radiation injury from brain metastasis recurrence. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with contrast-enhancing brain lesions (n = 54) on MRI after radiotherapy of brain metastases underwent dynamic 18F-FET PET. Tumour-to-brain ratios (TBRs) of 18F-FET uptake and 62 textural parameters were determined on summed images 20-40 min post-injection. Tracer uptake kinetics, i.e., time-to-peak (TTP) and patterns of time-activity curves (TAC) were evaluated on dynamic PET data from 0-50 min post-injection. Diagnostic accuracy of investigated parameters and combinations thereof to discriminate between brain metastasis recurrence and radiation injury was compared. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy increased from 81 % for TBRmean alone to 85 % when combined with the textural parameter Coarseness or Short-zone emphasis. The accuracy of TBRmax alone was 83 % and increased to 85 % after combination with the textural parameters Coarseness, Short-zone emphasis, or Correlation. Analysis of TACs resulted in an accuracy of 70 % for kinetic pattern alone and increased to 83 % when combined with TBRmax. CONCLUSIONS: Textural feature analysis in combination with TBRs may have the potential to increase diagnostic accuracy for discrimination between brain metastasis recurrence and radiation injury, without the need for dynamic 18F-FET PET scans. KEY POINTS: • Textural feature analysis provides quantitative information about tumour heterogeneity • Textural features help improve discrimination between brain metastasis recurrence and radiation injury • Textural features might be helpful to further understand tumour heterogeneity • Analysis does not require a more time consuming dynamic PET acquisition.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the potential of textural feature analysis of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET to differentiate radiation injury from brain metastasis recurrence. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with contrast-enhancing brain lesions (n = 54) on MRI after radiotherapy of brain metastases underwent dynamic 18F-FET PET. Tumour-to-brain ratios (TBRs) of 18F-FET uptake and 62 textural parameters were determined on summed images 20-40 min post-injection. Tracer uptake kinetics, i.e., time-to-peak (TTP) and patterns of time-activity curves (TAC) were evaluated on dynamic PET data from 0-50 min post-injection. Diagnostic accuracy of investigated parameters and combinations thereof to discriminate between brain metastasis recurrence and radiation injury was compared. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy increased from 81 % for TBRmean alone to 85 % when combined with the textural parameter Coarseness or Short-zone emphasis. The accuracy of TBRmax alone was 83 % and increased to 85 % after combination with the textural parameters Coarseness, Short-zone emphasis, or Correlation. Analysis of TACs resulted in an accuracy of 70 % for kinetic pattern alone and increased to 83 % when combined with TBRmax. CONCLUSIONS: Textural feature analysis in combination with TBRs may have the potential to increase diagnostic accuracy for discrimination between brain metastasis recurrence and radiation injury, without the need for dynamic 18F-FET PET scans. KEY POINTS: • Textural feature analysis provides quantitative information about tumour heterogeneity • Textural features help improve discrimination between brain metastasis recurrence and radiation injury • Textural features might be helpful to further understand tumour heterogeneity • Analysis does not require a more time consuming dynamic PET acquisition.
Entities:
Keywords:
Brain metastasis; FET PET; Radiation injury; Radiomics; Textural analysis
Authors: Gabriele Pöpperl; Friedrich W Kreth; Jan H Mehrkens; Jochen Herms; Klaus Seelos; Walter Koch; Franz J Gildehaus; Hans A Kretzschmar; Jörg C Tonn; Klaus Tatsch Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-09-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Gary J R Cook; Connie Yip; Muhammad Siddique; Vicky Goh; Sugama Chicklore; Arunabha Roy; Paul Marsden; Shahreen Ahmad; David Landau Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Bodo Lippitz; Christer Lindquist; Ian Paddick; David Peterson; Kevin O'Neill; Ronald Beaney Journal: Cancer Treat Rev Date: 2013-06-27 Impact factor: 12.111
Authors: Nathalie L Jansen; Bogdana Suchorska; Vera Wenter; Sabina Eigenbrod; Christine Schmid-Tannwald; Andreas Zwergal; Maximilian Niyazi; Mark Drexler; Peter Bartenstein; Oliver Schnell; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Niklas Thon; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Christian la Fougère Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ji Eun Park; Donghyun Kim; Ho Sung Kim; Seo Young Park; Jung Youn Kim; Se Jin Cho; Jae Ho Shin; Jeong Hoon Kim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Norbert Galldiks; Karl-Josef Langen; Nathalie L Albert; Marc Chamberlain; Riccardo Soffietti; Michelle M Kim; Ian Law; Emilie Le Rhun; Susan Chang; Julian Schwarting; Stephanie E Combs; Matthias Preusser; Peter Forsyth; Whitney Pope; Michael Weller; Jörg C Tonn Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Norbert Galldiks; Martin Kocher; Garry Ceccon; Jan-Michael Werner; Anna Brunn; Martina Deckert; Whitney B Pope; Riccardo Soffietti; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Weller; Jörg C Tonn; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-01-11 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Robert H Press; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; James M Mountz; Brenda F Kurland; Richard L Wahl; Ella F Jones; Nola M Hylton; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Robert J Nordstrom; Lori Henderson; Karen A Kurdziel; Bhadrasain Vikram; Michael A Jacobs; Matthias Holdhoff; Edward Taylor; David A Jaffray; Lawrence H Schwartz; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan; Hannah M Linden; Philippe Lambin; Thomas J Dilling; Daniel L Rubin; Lubomir Hadjiiski; John M Buatti Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-06-30 Impact factor: 7.038