Literature DB >> 31202213

Aging mice show impaired memory updating in the novel OUL updating paradigm.

Janine L Kwapis1,2, Yasaman Alaghband3, Ashley A Keiser3, Tri N Dong3, Christina M Michael3, Diane Rhee3, Guanhua Shu3, Richard T Dang3, Dina P Matheos3, Marcelo A Wood3.   

Abstract

Memories do not persist in a permanent, static state but instead must be dynamically modified in response to new information. Although new memory formation is typically studied in a laboratory setting, most real-world associations are modifications to existing memories, particularly in the aging, experienced brain. To date, the field has lacked a simple behavioral paradigm that can measure whether original and updated information is remembered in a single test session. To address this gap, we have developed a novel memory updating paradigm, called the Objects in Updated Locations (OUL) task that is capable of assessing memory updating in a non-stressful task that is appropriate for both young and old rodents. We first show that young mice successfully remember both the original memory and the updated information in OUL. Next, we demonstrate that intrahippocampal infusion of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin disrupts both the updated information and the original memory at test, suggesting that memory updating in OUL engages the original memory. To verify this, we used the Arc CatFISH technique to show that the OUL update session reactivates a largely overlapping set of neurons as the original memory. Finally, using OUL, we show that memory updating is impaired in aging, 18-m.o. mice. Together, these results demonstrate that hippocampal memory updating is impaired with aging and establish that the OUL paradigm is an effective, sensitive method of assessing memory updating in rodents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31202213      PMCID: PMC6901557          DOI: 10.1038/s41386-019-0438-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  48 in total

1.  Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval.

Authors:  K Nader; G E Schafe; J E Le Doux
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The timing of multiple retrieval events can alter GluR1 phosphorylation and the requirement for protein synthesis in fear memory reconsolidation.

Authors:  Timothy J Jarome; Janine L Kwapis; Craig T Werner; Ryan G Parsons; Georgette M Gafford; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Long-term stability of fear memory depends on the synthesis of protein but not mRNA in the amygdala.

Authors:  Ryan G Parsons; Georgette M Gafford; David E Baruch; Brady A Riedner; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Memory reconsolidation: sensitivity of spatial memory to inhibition of protein synthesis in dorsal hippocampus during encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  Richard G M Morris; Jennifer Inglis; James A Ainge; Henry J Olverman; Jane Tulloch; Yadin Dudai; Paul A T Kelly
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Synaptic protein degradation underlies destabilization of retrieved fear memory.

Authors:  Sue-Hyun Lee; Jun-Hyeok Choi; Nuribalhae Lee; Hye-Ryeon Lee; Jae-Ick Kim; Nam-Kyung Yu; Sun-Lim Choi; Seung-Hee Lee; Hyoung Kim; Bong-Kiun Kaang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  A single standard for memory: the case for reconsolidation.

Authors:  Karim Nader; Oliver Hardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Memory reconsolidation mediates the strengthening of memories by additional learning.

Authors:  Jonathan L C Lee
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Detection of a temporal error triggers reconsolidation of amygdala-dependent memories.

Authors:  Lorenzo Díaz-Mataix; Raquel Chacon Ruiz Martinez; Glenn E Schafe; Joseph E LeDoux; Valérie Doyère
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  An Update on Memory Reconsolidation Updating.

Authors:  Jonathan L C Lee; Karim Nader; Daniela Schiller
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Activity dependent protein degradation is critical for the formation and stability of fear memory in the amygdala.

Authors:  Timothy J Jarome; Craig T Werner; Janine L Kwapis; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Investigating Memory Updating in Mice Using the Objects in Updated Locations Task.

Authors:  Destiny S Wright; Kasuni K Bodinayake; Janine L Kwapis
Journal:  Curr Protoc Neurosci       Date:  2020-03

2.  Gut bacterial isoamylamine promotes age-related cognitive dysfunction by promoting microglial cell death.

Authors:  Yun Teng; Jingyao Mu; Fangyi Xu; Xiangcheng Zhang; Mukesh K Sriwastva; Qiaohong M Liu; Xiaohong Li; Chao Lei; Kumaran Sundaram; Xin Hu; Lifeng Zhang; Juw Won Park; Jae Yeon Hwang; Eric C Rouchka; Xiang Zhang; Jun Yan; Michael L Merchant; Huang-Ge Zhang
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 31.316

Review 3.  Molecular Mechanisms of Reconsolidation-Dependent Memory Updating.

Authors:  Lauren Bellfy; Janine L Kwapis
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Age-Related Memory Impairment Is Associated with Increased zif268 Protein Accumulation and Decreased Rpt6 Phosphorylation.

Authors:  Sydney Trask; Brooke N Dulka; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.