Literature DB >> 31985896

Investigating Memory Updating in Mice Using the Objects in Updated Locations Task.

Destiny S Wright1, Kasuni K Bodinayake1, Janine L Kwapis1.   

Abstract

In the laboratory, memory is typically studied as a de novo experience, in which a naïve animal is exposed to a discrete learning event that is markedly different from its past experiences. Most real-world memories, however, are updates-modifications or additions-to existing memories. This is particularly true in the aging, experienced brain. To better understand memory updating, we have developed a new behavioral paradigm called the objects in updated locations (OUL) task. OUL relies on hippocampus-dependent spatial learning and has the advantage of being able to test both the original memory and the updated information in a single test session. Further, OUL relies on incidental learning that avoids unnecessary stress that might hinder the performance of aging animals. In OUL, animals first learn the location of two identical objects in a familiar context. This memory is then updated by moving one object to a new location. Finally, to assess the animals' memory for the original and the updated information, all animals are given a test session in which they are exposed to four copies of the object: two in the original training locations, one in the updated location, and one in a novel location. By comparing exploration of the novel location to the familiar locations, we can infer whether the animal remembers the original and updated object locations. OUL is a simple but powerful task that could provide new insights into the cellular, circuit-level, and molecular mechanisms that support memory updating.
© 2020 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; hippocampus; object memory; reconsolidation; updating

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31985896      PMCID: PMC8061236          DOI: 10.1002/cpns.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Protoc Neurosci        ISSN: 1934-8576


  28 in total

1.  Teaching old rats new tricks: age-related impairments in olfactory reversal learning.

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Summer Nugent; Michael P Saddoris; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 2.  Emerging role of viral vectors for circuit-specific gene interrogation and manipulation in rodent brain.

Authors:  Erika Sarno; Alfred J Robison
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Contextual Information Drives the Reconsolidation-Dependent Updating of Retrieved Fear Memories.

Authors:  Timothy J Jarome; Nicole C Ferrara; Janine L Kwapis; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Aging mice show impaired memory updating in the novel OUL updating paradigm.

Authors:  Janine L Kwapis; Yasaman Alaghband; Ashley A Keiser; Tri N Dong; Christina M Michael; Diane Rhee; Guanhua Shu; Richard T Dang; Dina P Matheos; Marcelo A Wood
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Updating Procedures Can Reorganize the Neural Circuit Supporting a Fear Memory.

Authors:  Janine L Kwapis; Timothy J Jarome; Nicole C Ferrara; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 6.  Epigenetic mechanisms of memory formation and reconsolidation.

Authors:  Timothy J Jarome; Farah D Lubin
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 7.  HDAC3 and the molecular brake pad hypothesis.

Authors:  Susan C McQuown; Marcelo A Wood
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Counterconditioning During Reconsolidation Prevents Relapse of Cocaine Memories.

Authors:  Koral Goltseker; Lilach Bolotin; Segev Barak
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Retrograde amnesia produced by electroconvulsive shock after reactivation of a consolidated memory trace.

Authors:  J R Misanin; R R Miller; D J Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Unconditioned stimulus revaluation to promote conditioned fear extinction in the memory reconsolidation window.

Authors:  Xiang-Xing Zeng; Juan Du; Chu-Qun Zhuang; Jun-Hua Zhang; Yan-Lei Jia; Xi-Fu Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Mechanisms of Reconsolidation-Dependent Memory Updating.

Authors:  Lauren Bellfy; Janine L Kwapis
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.