Literature DB >> 23453952

Detection of a temporal error triggers reconsolidation of amygdala-dependent memories.

Lorenzo Díaz-Mataix1, Raquel Chacon Ruiz Martinez, Glenn E Schafe, Joseph E LeDoux, Valérie Doyère.   

Abstract

Updating memories is critical for adaptive behaviors, but the rules and mechanisms governing that process are still not well defined. During a limited time window, the reactivation of consolidated aversive memories triggers memory lability and induces a plasticity-dependent reconsolidation process in the lateral nucleus of amygdala (LA) [1-5]. However, whether new information is necessary for initiating reconsolidation is not known. Here we show that changing the temporal relationship between the conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) during reactivation is sufficient to trigger synaptic plasticity and reconsolidation of an aversive memory in the LA. These findings demonstrate that time is a core part of the CS-US association and that new information must be presented during reactivation in order to trigger LA-dependent reconsolidation processes. In sum, this study provides new basic knowledge about the precise rules governing memory reconsolidation of aversive memories that might be used to treat traumatic memories.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23453952      PMCID: PMC3606686          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  25 in total

Review 1.  The role of metaplasticity mechanisms in regulating memory destabilization and reconsolidation.

Authors:  Peter S B Finnie; Karim Nader
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Cerebral correlates of salient prediction error for different rewards and punishments.

Authors:  Elise Metereau; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Expectation modulates neural responses to pleasant and aversive stimuli in primate amygdala.

Authors:  Marina A Belova; Joseph J Paton; Sara E Morrison; C Daniel Salzman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms of fear learning and memory.

Authors:  Joshua P Johansen; Christopher K Cain; Linnaea E Ostroff; Joseph E LeDoux
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction.

Authors:  R S Sutton; A G Barto
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Time and Associative Learning.

Authors:  Peter D Balsam; Michael R Drew; C R Gallistel
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2010

Review 7.  Placing prediction into the fear circuit.

Authors:  Gavan P McNally; Joshua P Johansen; Hugh T Blair
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  The amygdala encodes specific sensory features of an aversive reinforcer.

Authors:  Jacek Debiec; Llorenç Díaz-Mataix; David E A Bush; Valérie Doyère; Joseph E Ledoux
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Temporal maps and informativeness in associative learning.

Authors:  Peter D Balsam; C Randy Gallistel
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Reconsolidation: maintaining memory relevance.

Authors:  Jonathan L C Lee
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 13.837

View more
  59 in total

1.  Temporal maps in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Kathleen M Taylor; Victory Joseph; Alice S Zhao; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Investigating Memory Updating in Mice Using the Objects in Updated Locations Task.

Authors:  Destiny S Wright; Kasuni K Bodinayake; Janine L Kwapis
Journal:  Curr Protoc Neurosci       Date:  2020-03

Review 3.  Modulating reconsolidation: a link to causal systems-level dynamics of human memories.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen; Nitzan Censor
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  Time cells in the hippocampus: a new dimension for mapping memories.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Contextual Information Drives the Reconsolidation-Dependent Updating of Retrieved Fear Memories.

Authors:  Timothy J Jarome; Nicole C Ferrara; Janine L Kwapis; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Aging mice show impaired memory updating in the novel OUL updating paradigm.

Authors:  Janine L Kwapis; Yasaman Alaghband; Ashley A Keiser; Tri N Dong; Christina M Michael; Diane Rhee; Guanhua Shu; Richard T Dang; Dina P Matheos; Marcelo A Wood
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Updating Procedures Can Reorganize the Neural Circuit Supporting a Fear Memory.

Authors:  Janine L Kwapis; Timothy J Jarome; Nicole C Ferrara; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Limited replicability of drug-induced amnesia after contextual fear memory retrieval in rats.

Authors:  Natalie Schroyens; Joaquín Matias Alfei; Anna Elisabeth Schnell; Laura Luyten; Tom Beckers
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Hippocampal Processing of Ambiguity Enhances Fear Memory.

Authors:  Ugwechi Amadi; Seh Hong Lim; Elizabeth Liu; Michael V Baratta; Ki A Goosens
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-12-19

10.  Neural mechanisms of human temporal fear conditioning.

Authors:  Nathaniel G Harnett; Joshua R Shumen; Pooja A Wagle; Kimberly H Wood; Muriah D Wheelock; James H Baños; David C Knight
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.