| Literature DB >> 31190469 |
Rogerio N Soares1, Juan M Murias1, Flavia Saccone2, Leopoldo Puga2, Gustavo Moreno2,3, Miguel Resnik2,3, Gabriela F De Roia4.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate whether near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived reperfusion slope would detect the effects of a 12-week rehabilitation program on lower limb microvascular responsiveness in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Ten CHD patients (7 males and 3 females; 57.3 ± 7.6 years) underwent 12 weeks of drug treatment and high-intensity interval training (HIIT), 2 times per week (40 min/session). Microvascular responsiveness was assessed by using NIRS assessment of muscle oxygen saturation (StO2 ) combined with a vascular occlusion test (VOT) (NIRS-VOT). NIRS-VOT measures were taken at pre- and postintervention, and microvascular responsiveness was evaluated by examining the slope 2 of re-oxygenation rate (slope 2 StO2 ) and the area under the curve (StO2 AUC ) of StO2 signal following cuff release subsequent to a 5-min occlusion period. The slope 2 StO2 was significantly steeper after 12 weeks of training (4.8 ± 1.6% sec-1 ) compared to the pretraining (3.1 ± 1.6% sec-1 ) (P < 0.05). The area under the curve for the change in the % StO2 signal during re-oxygenation increased significantly from 3494 ± 2372%∙sec at pretraining to 9006 ± 4311%∙sec at post-training (P < 0.05). NIRS-VOT technique detected the improvements of 12 weeks of rehabilitation program in the lower limb microvascular responsiveness of CHD patients.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990NIRSzzm321990; Cardiovascular disease; microvascular responsiveness; rehabilitation; vascular
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31190469 PMCID: PMC6562121 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Medical treatment taken by patients in the study
| Medical treatment | Number of patients |
|---|---|
| Β blockers | 10 |
| ACE inhibitors | 5 |
| Angiotensin receptor antagonists | 3 |
| Antiplatelet agents | 10 |
| Statins | 10 |
| Others | 10 |
General characteristics of the patients (n = 10)
| Pretraining (Mean±SD) | Posttraining (Mean±SD) | |
|---|---|---|
| Height (cm) | 165.1 ± 6.5 | 165.1 ± 6.5 |
| Body mass (kg) | 82.7 ± 14.6 | 81.8 ± 15.6 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 30.3 ± 5.1 | 30.0 ± 5.4 |
| Blood pressure (mmHg) | ||
| Systolic blood pressure | 121.0 ± 7.4 | 122.0 ± 9.2 |
| Diastolic blood pressure | 85.0 ± 5.3 | 85.5 ± 3.7 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 71.1 ± 9.4 | 68.9 ± 9.0 |
Profiles of oxygen saturation signal pre‐ and post‐training
| Pre (Mean ± SD) | Post (Mean ± SD) | |
|---|---|---|
| % StO2 baseline | 57.9 ± 10.9 | 55.3 ± 8.5 |
| % StO2 minimum | 16.5 ± 15.1 | 10.0 ± 15.0 |
| % StO2 maximum | 73.5 ± 10.8 | 82.9 ± 6.9 |
| % StO2 amplitude | 58.8 ± 17.3 | 72.9 ± 7.0 |
Baseline% StO2, 2 min average of oxygen saturation signal prior to the occlusion period; Minimum % StO2 value, minimal value of the oxygen saturation signal during occlusion; Maximal % StO2 value, maximal value of the oxygen saturation signal during reperfusion; % StO2 amplitude, difference between minimal and maximal oxygen saturation values.
Difference between groups (P < 0.05); paired Student's t‐test.
Figure 1Comparison between pre‐ and post‐training values for Slope 2 of oxygen saturation (Slope 2 StO2) and area under the curve of oxygen saturation during reperfusion (StO2 ). Panel A, greater slope 2 StO2at post‐rehabilitation compared to the pre‐rehabilitation (mean ± SD); Panel B, representative oxygen saturation profiles highlighting the differences between pre‐ and post‐rehabilitation for the 10‐sec window upslope (slope 2 StO2) as indicated by the dashed lines; Panel C, greater StO2 at post‐rehabilitation compared to the pre‐rehabilitation (mean ± SD); and Panel D, representative profiles highlighting the differences between pre‐ and post‐rehabilitation for area under the curve of StO2signal during reperfusion (filled in gray area (AUC)). *Difference between pre‐ and post‐rehabilitation (P < 0.05). For comparison between variables, a paired Student's t‐test was applied.