Literature DB >> 29140137

Oxygen Uptake and Muscle Deoxygenation Kinetics During Skating: Comparison Between Slide-Board and Treadmill Skating.

Tatiane Piucco, Rogério Soares, Fernando Diefenthaeler, Guillaume Y Millet, Juan M Murias.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the oxygen-uptake ([Formula: see text]) kinetics during skating on a treadmill and skating on a slide board and to discuss potential mechanisms that might control the [Formula: see text] kinetics responses during skating.
METHODS: Breath-by-breath pulmonary [Formula: see text] and near-infrared spectroscopy-derived muscle deoxygenated hemoglobin and myoglobin ([HHbMb]) were monitored continuously in 12 well-trained, young, long-track speed skaters. On-transient [Formula: see text] and [HHbMb] responses to skating on a treadmill and skating on a slide board at 80% of the estimated gas exchange threshold were fitted as monoexponential function. The signals were time-aligned, and the individual [HHbMb]-to-[Formula: see text] ratio was calculated as the average value from 20 to 120 s after exercise starts.
RESULTS: The time constants for the adjustment of phase II [Formula: see text] (τ [Formula: see text]) and [HHbMb] (τ [HHbMb]) were low and similar between slide board and treadmill skating (18.1 [3.4] vs 18.9 [3.6] for τ [Formula: see text] and 12.6 [4.0] vs 12.4 [4.0] s for τ [HHbMb]). The [Formula: see text] ratio was not different from 1.0 (P > .05) in both conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: The fast [Formula: see text] kinetics during skating suggest that chronic adaptation to skating might overcome any possible restriction in leg blood flow during low-intensity exercise. The [Formula: see text] ratio values also suggest a good matching of O2 delivery to O2 utilization in trained speed skaters. The similar τ [Formula: see text] and τ [HHbMb] values between slide board and treadmill further reinforce the validity of using a slide board for skating testing and training purposes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  V ˙ O 2 kinetics; speed skating; test validity; training

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29140137     DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform        ISSN: 1555-0265            Impact factor:   4.010


  5 in total

1.  Effects of a rehabilitation program on microvascular function of CHD patients assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Rogerio N Soares; Juan M Murias; Flavia Saccone; Leopoldo Puga; Gustavo Moreno; Miguel Resnik; Gabriela F De Roia
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-06

2.  Ketone Bodies Impact on Hypoxic CO2 Retention Protocol During Exercise.

Authors:  Philip J Prins; Jeffrey D Buxton; Tyler S McClure; Dominic P D'Agostino; Dana L Ault; Gary L Welton; Dalton W Jones; Adam D Atwell; Macey A Slack; Marah L Slack; Chloe E Williams; Morgan E Blanchflower; Kristia K Kannel; Madison N Faulkner; Hannah L Szmaciasz; Stephanie M Croll; Lindsey M Stanforth; Tim D Harris; Holton C Gwaltney; Andrew P Koutnik
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Usefulness of Portable Device to Establish Differences in Muscle Oxygenation Between the Wingate Test and Graded Exercise Test: Effect of Gender on Anaerobic and Aerobic Capacity in Speed Skaters.

Authors:  Kinga Rębiś; Dorota Sadowska; Michal Starczewski; Andrzej Klusiewicz
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Combining Chronic Ischemic Preconditioning and Inspiratory Muscle Warm-Up to Enhance On-Ice Time-Trial Performance in Elite Speed Skaters.

Authors:  Philippe Richard; François Billaut
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Acute Photobiomodulation Does Not Influence Specific High-Intensity and Intermittent Performance in Female Futsal Players.

Authors:  Izabela Aparecida Dos Santos; Marina de Paiva Lemos; Vitória Helena Maciel Coelho; Alessandro Moura Zagatto; Moacir Marocolo; Rogério Nogueira Soares; Octávio Barbosa Neto; Gustavo R Mota
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.