Literature DB >> 19549080

Selective visual attention and motivation: the consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task.

Jane E Raymond1, Jennifer L O'Brien.   

Abstract

Learning to associate the probability and value of behavioral outcomes with specific stimuli (value learning) is essential for rational decision making. However, in demanding cognitive conditions, access to learned values might be constrained by limited attentional capacity. We measured recognition of briefly presented faces seen previously in a value-learning task involving monetary wins and losses; the recognition task was performed both with and without constraints on available attention. Regardless of available attention, recognition was substantially enhanced for motivationally salient stimuli (i.e., stimuli highly predictive of outcomes), compared with equally familiar stimuli that had weak or no motivational salience, and this effect was found regardless of valence (win or loss). However, when attention was constrained (because stimuli were presented during an attentional blink, AB), valence determined recognition; win-associated faces showed no AB, but all other faces showed large ABs. Motivational salience acts independently of attention to modulate simple perceptual decisions, but when attention is limited, visual processing is biased in favor of reward-associated stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19549080     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02391.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  86 in total

1.  Resistance to change and relapse of observing.

Authors:  Eric A Thrailkill; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Value associations of irrelevant stimuli modify rapid visual orienting.

Authors:  Helena J V Rutherford; Jennifer L O'Brien; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

3.  Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Leonardo Chelazzi; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Reward, attention, and HIV-related risk in HIV+ individuals.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Sharif I Kronemer; Jessica J Rilee; Ned Sacktor; Cherie L Marvel
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 5.996

5.  Oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal the availability of reward.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Tom Nissens; Daniel Pearson; Mike Le Pelley; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The Attribution of Value-Based Attentional Priority in Individuals with Depressive Symptoms.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Stephanie L Leal; Michelle G Hall; Michael A Yassa; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014

7.  How Attention Changes in Response to Incentives.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Priming by motivationally salient distractors produces hemispheric asymmetries in visual processing.

Authors:  Rashmi Gupta; Jane E Raymond; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-24

9.  The role of reward prediction in the control of attention.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Attentional bias for nondrug reward is magnified in addiction.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Monica L Faulkner; Jessica J Rilee; Steven Yantis; Cherie L Marvel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.